![]() |
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Dutchman610 - 11-23-2016 (11-23-2016, 12:43 PM)maxx55 Wrote:(11-23-2016, 12:24 PM)pakr93 Wrote: So ... it seems that Shannon is confident in DMSI 3.0.1-X enough that he is doubling the price for newcomers. Since it is a bundle, I'd like to know if you can switch between the two with out a rest period? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - maxx55 - 11-23-2016 (11-23-2016, 01:07 PM)Dutchman610 Wrote:(11-23-2016, 12:43 PM)maxx55 Wrote:(11-23-2016, 12:24 PM)pakr93 Wrote: So ... it seems that Shannon is confident in DMSI 3.0.1-X enough that he is doubling the price for newcomers. Wasn't 2.3 the same as 2.2 but without healing? If it was fine to switch back then I'd guess it'd be fine for 3.0.1. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - OberynMartell - 11-23-2016 (11-23-2016, 01:44 PM)maxx55 Wrote:(11-23-2016, 01:07 PM)Dutchman610 Wrote:(11-23-2016, 12:43 PM)maxx55 Wrote:(11-23-2016, 12:24 PM)pakr93 Wrote: So ... it seems that Shannon is confident in DMSI 3.0.1-X enough that he is doubling the price for newcomers. If I remember correctly it was from 2.4 to 2.5 that Shannon asked to go on without a rest period in between to test that out. I don't know what it will be for 3A and B. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - RTBoss - 11-23-2016 (11-23-2016, 01:44 PM)maxx55 Wrote:(11-23-2016, 01:07 PM)Dutchman610 Wrote:(11-23-2016, 12:43 PM)maxx55 Wrote:(11-23-2016, 12:24 PM)pakr93 Wrote: So ... it seems that Shannon is confident in DMSI 3.0.1-X enough that he is doubling the price for newcomers. Switching from 2.4 to 2.5 was the first time Shannon didn't recommend a break, and was also a test to see how badly people encountered turbulence. Every version has had at least some tweaking and changes, and 2.3 was different from 2.2 (it wasn't exactly the same program with healing modules disabled). RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - bogdy - 11-23-2016 (11-23-2016, 06:04 AM)Shannon Wrote: PUA isn't what you want to aim for, methinks. Shannon what do you think about PUA community? It does more harm than good to a man? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Benjamin - 11-23-2016 Quote:" He" is not trolling. Sorry Sarge, I actually meant Risingson with these suggestions hes been making for DMSI along with what he wrote in the other thread. Didn't even think that it had quoted what you wrote too. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - SargeMaximus - 11-23-2016 (11-23-2016, 02:45 PM)Benjamin Wrote:Quote:" He" is not trolling. I appreciate that Ben, thank you. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - RisingSon - 11-23-2016 Sarge, even if we both have Asperger and are possible trolls it's OK. We are going to make it through this. ![]() With our highly intuitive male minds we shall continue to observe and hint at female nature until the subliminal is effective or until I give up. (some say autism and stuff like that is due to hypermasculinized brains, but whatever) I can see how I get branded as a troll because my views are so radical. Well, guess why? I studied female manipulation/social behavior/biology/history for years while on AM6. And almost fell into the abyss... Also, I'm sort of an ivory tower intellectual and don't have social (female) pressures constantly placed on me to make me conform and be a 'good boy' with politically correct views so I can come across as so shocking it induces cognitive dissonance. Still, I'm excited and really impressed at the fine nuances these subs and Shannon are able to articulate. Just needs a little more uuummmpphhhhhh. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - RisingSon - 11-23-2016 Or more like the brakes taken off. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-23-2016 (11-23-2016, 12:00 PM)ncbeareatingman Wrote: E3 is going to be light years different than E2. <----SHannon's comment...Mine: How so will it be light years different? as in all the new bell and whistles,along the umpah's and bumpah's( think dr.suess's Grinch lines)??? It's going to have all the technological additions since E2, of course. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-23-2016 (11-23-2016, 12:24 PM)pakr93 Wrote: So ... it seems that Shannon is confident in DMSI 3.0.1-X enough that he is doubling the price for newcomers. Not changing the price, just releasing A and B versions of it as one package. This will keep the script consistent between both and allow for easier switching between them. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-23-2016 (11-23-2016, 01:07 PM)Dutchman610 Wrote:(11-23-2016, 12:43 PM)maxx55 Wrote:(11-23-2016, 12:24 PM)pakr93 Wrote: So ... it seems that Shannon is confident in DMSI 3.0.1-X enough that he is doubling the price for newcomers. Part of the point is to minimize script differences so you can switch between them with little to no rest between. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-23-2016 (11-23-2016, 02:12 PM)bogdy Wrote:(11-23-2016, 06:04 AM)Shannon Wrote: PUA isn't what you want to aim for, methinks. I think it's a group of guys who are trying to achieve their genetic directive of getting laid. Beyond that, there are a lot of differing points of view, and some are harmful and some are helpful. I don't think any one group or ideology has it all right. And since I don't pay much attention to it, beyond that, I can't really comment. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-23-2016 (11-23-2016, 02:34 PM)Happylife01 Wrote: so us who using 2.5 will be eligible for free update? thanks shannon, you are the best. you showing us how the real world is. what a powerful advantage we got Updates ad upgrades are free until the program does what satisfies me that it is achieving the goals sufficiently. So anyone who has purchased a copy of 1.x through 2.5 will get 3.0.1 for free. |