Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Thread-Vol-8) |
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - ReconGunner - 08-01-2024 (08-01-2024, 10:20 AM)Shannon Wrote:(08-01-2024, 04:32 AM)Wiseg9999 Wrote: hi @Shannon , I need help finding a job asap. Which subliminal would help me?Ultra Success and Money Magnet are good choices, but Ultra Success is going to work faster. UMS v2 is also a good choice, but it'll be by far the slowest, even though it can produce some very profound results. I would go for Ultra Success in your shoes. I'm using USLM v4.2 for the same major purpose. Older tech, etc.; but it's all I have and I can't afford anything else. I'm having subconscious resistance that seems to have peaked earlier this week but hasn't fully subsided. And I also believe that external conditions that affect the job markets are strongly in play and potentially impacting the LM portion of the experience, if I understand that part correctly. So still pressing forward. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - Shannon - 08-01-2024 (08-01-2024, 10:57 AM)callie Wrote:(08-01-2024, 10:24 AM)Shannon Wrote: Undervoluming the program is only going to allow your subconscious to have the time and strength to find a way to combat the script more effectively if that is what it wants to do. The instructions are not suggestions, or I would call it "suggested usage patterns". The volumes I give are what the models indicate will work best for the majority of people, so you may be an outlier, but if we are going to get this dealt with, you need to to two things: Correct, and we can't know what it does if we don't try it. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - NOMAD - 08-01-2024 Shannon Wrote:Last night was the first run of the 6G-Alpha test experience. Do you have any first impressions that you're willing to share? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - Shannon - 08-01-2024 (08-01-2024, 06:52 PM)NOMAD Wrote:Shannon Wrote:Last night was the first run of the 6G-Alpha test experience. Eye opening. We still only have a very small amount of experience with it, but it's definitely been eye opening. Beyond that I will refrain from saying anything, since we have so little data yet and I don't want to start setting expectations, since this is the alpha test and beta may have significant changes made to it, as well as Final. But 6G is definitely a different beast. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - kserenyi - 08-02-2024 Since UMS v.2 contains US/LM v.4.2 already, could US/LM v.5.0 be considered a 5.11G substitute for UMS v.2 stage 4? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - Shannon - 08-02-2024 (08-02-2024, 07:01 AM)kserenyi Wrote: Since UMS v.2 contains US/LM v.4.2 already, could US/LM v.5.0 be considered a 5.11G substitute for UMS v.2 stage 4? Not even close, no. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - ncbeareatingman - 08-02-2024 Dayuumm Man thats incredible !! I get it, Man that your're not done yet, but still thats incredible!! Shannon's quote: " That is absolutely huge, I cannot begin to convey how big that is. It took me 7 years of just thinking to come up with that concept, and 3 more to figure out how to actually implement it as a script" RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - Shannon - 08-02-2024 (08-02-2024, 10:35 AM)ncbeareatingman Wrote: Dayuumm Man thats incredible !! I get it, Man that your're not done yet, but still thats incredible!! Yes, and on top of that, whatever results we get are using a skeleton script that is only 10% optimized at the moment, and has not been through the other processing stage necessary yet either. So we have achieved 1 of the 3 goals for Alpha (proving 6G safe). We are already mostly finished proving the second goal (6G works as designed and intended). And the 3rd goal is to understand where it can be improved still, which will doubtless require significant time. Even after just 3 days, though, it has shown itself to be both complex and very beautiful. It reminds me of watching a peony bloom, so far. In Beta, I will make whatever additions are necessary, remove whatever scripting is no longer necessary and optimize the other 90% of the skeleton script. Then we will test Beta, with goals being to verify that it works as designed and reaches full potential, and then before Final I will go through one more time and apply any additions and optimizations that I have come up with before I release 6G-Final to the public. My ultimate goal is to make this generation good enough that I cannot develop it further because of limitations outside my control, and then build the library out fully in 6G. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - Frosted - 08-02-2024 (08-02-2024, 11:14 AM)Shannon Wrote:(08-02-2024, 10:35 AM)ncbeareatingman Wrote: Dayuumm Man thats incredible !! I get it, Man that your're not done yet, but still thats incredible!! Ah man it’s stuff like this that hypes me up. Muhahahaha!!! Alright excuse me while I enter my Cryogenic sleep. Wake me up when 6G is here. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - ncbeareatingman - 08-02-2024 (08-02-2024, 11:42 AM)Frosted Wrote:(08-02-2024, 11:14 AM)Shannon Wrote: Even after just 3 days, though, it has shown itself to be both complex and very beautiful. It reminds me of watching a peony bloom, so far. MY response: : "Scuse me while I Kiss the sky" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eMREU0528WE "wake me up before ya go go ,coz Im not planning on going solo" . LMAO! RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - Sky - 08-02-2024 @Shannon Will maximum learning speed improve in 6G? Are you able to predict how it will change based on your new insights so far? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - Shannon - 08-02-2024 (08-02-2024, 02:09 PM)Sky Wrote: @Shannon Will maximum learning speed improve in 6G? Are you able to predict how it will change based on your new insights so far? If it was not going to improve I would not have spent the 12+ years developing 6G, and I would not bother building MLS again. I don't know enough about 6G or the 6G MLS to answer the rest. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - Sky - 08-02-2024 (08-02-2024, 03:42 PM)Shannon Wrote:(08-02-2024, 02:09 PM)Sky Wrote: @Shannon Will maximum learning speed improve in 6G? Are you able to predict how it will change based on your new insights so far? Good to know RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - emiebou - 08-03-2024 (08-02-2024, 07:01 AM)kserenyi Wrote: Since UMS v.2 contains US/LM v.4.2 already, could US/LM v.5.0 be considered a 5.11G substitute for UMS v.2 stage 4?Based on my experience using UMS v2 and USLM 4.2, I think USLM 5.0 can only replace a portion of UMS v2 Stage 1. @Shannon Shannon, does Brain Optimizer have a shield feature? Btw congrats on successfully creating the 6G Alpha program! |