![]() |
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-01-2016 I haven't responded to the posts I am going to respond to since my last post in this thread, but I will say this... that I have two partially full bottles of that version of A314, and they're very rarely used. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Catman - 11-01-2016 (11-01-2016, 04:18 PM)Shannon Wrote: I haven't responded to the posts I am going to respond to since my last post in this thread, but I will say this... that I have two partially full bottles of that version of A314, and they're very rarely used. Oh my god...I've heard so much about it, I wish I could still buy it from them. Seems other stuff on the market now comes nowhere NEAR what that thing did in it's prime. This is what I am: ![]() Jelly. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-01-2016 (11-01-2016, 11:35 AM)bits Wrote: Shannon, I know you have hormone optimization in DMSI but if you have the ability to target certain hormones or pheromones for production, please target 3ß-Androstanediol: I theoretically can target specific end result pheromones, but it would require a vastly more complex method than I use right now. Right now I am using the equivalent of a hardware abstraction later built in to the "operating system", and what would be different is that I would have to "hard code the direct route". In other words, right now, I am effectively saying to the subconscious... "I want end results A, B and C. Figure out how to get there safely, and then do that." If I tried to do it directly, I would have to somehow find a way to communicate what chemistry I needed ingested to extract the precursor molecules, which precursor molecules to extract, and exactly what to do with them. How do I communicate this to the subconscious, when I don't know the chemical requirements directly, and the subconscious may not know what 3ß-Androstanediol is, or any of the precursor chemistry? It would stall development for literally years, and give no guarantee of success. So I will remain with the HAL method. We will just me more specific with exactly what results we want. But this does sound like a good goal for making the program work. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Benjamin - 11-01-2016 Quote:This is what I am Hahahahhaha. I pictured you more with a Brad Pitt body and a tabby cat face, I didn't realize that you were a plate of red jelly all this time! RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Catman - 11-01-2016 (11-01-2016, 03:54 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:(11-01-2016, 03:09 PM)CatMan Wrote:(11-01-2016, 02:33 PM)posh Wrote: you can't get it. The product got changed and now it doesn't work here the full story: http://houseofpheromones.com/androtics-direct-review-scam-a314-pherotalk/ It's been tried many times and all resulted in failure. One project by someone is going on now and apparently he says he has a substitute for it. But that's in the early stages of development so I'm not holding my breath, could just be more BS talk. For some reason they invented the greatest thing ever, truly life changing results, but then shot themselves in the foot by ruining the formula for it and it's NEVER been the same. They annoyingly always change the formulas over time, so you never know if it'll produce the same results you pay for, or better, or worse. Imagine buying subs from Shannon, paying 6G prices, but never knowing if it'll be 6G or 3G. It's prime reputation is legendary. Stuff you wouldn't even believe. I've offered a good pile of money to FIND some of it's prime revision and I can pay to send it to a high end laboratory so it's formula can be determined once and for all. It'd be incredible to test it myself, but I've never seen any and obviously people don't want to sell it so I haven't been able to get any to send to a lab to replicate it, sadly. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Catman - 11-01-2016 (11-01-2016, 04:29 PM)Benjamin Wrote:Quote:This is what I am Jelly is my street alias, I don't like to talk about it often. Maybe I need to run E2 more to let go of the insecurity of it, though. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-01-2016 I have two partial bottles of Revision 17 and one bottle that is unlabeled as to revision. One of the R23's has been stored in the freezer, and one has not. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - bits - 11-01-2016 (11-01-2016, 01:24 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: Holy shit! Yes, this is EXACTLY what we want in DMSI, especially the bolded. Sadly rev.23 is long gone, revisions after it weren't as good and it went downhill from there. The current revision (32) is good as a status and respect mix but it's not anywhere near the level of attraction and respect rev.23 or the love-scent edition had. As for recreating these effects with DMSI if Shannon can target specific pheromones to increase in production then that would be one way. People who are high status do have a different pheromone and energy about them, this is why when you wear high status pheromones people assume you're rich, important, powerful, famous, etc. Even if they've never met anyone powerful/famous and don't have a baseline to know how such a person would come across they just get a primal response. What causes that change in their pheromones could be any number of things - knowing that you're famous could trigger your body to produce it, being around other famous people with that signature will change your signature to keep up, not having stress from money will drastically lower cortisol and allow more hormones to rise to the surface, etc. Some of this is already in DMSI especially with the healing and "inner game" aspects. If it's not possible to target certain hormones then the next way to create it would be through the aura, pheromones and auras may feed off each other or influence one another, me and a few others certainly believe this in using titan from apex. I'll get stares across the street, in cars, and way outside of mone smelling distance but within their vision of sight. The main effects of 3a-diol are: -status (2nd only to whatever is in aqua vitae IMO) -sexual attraction and orgasm enhancement -trust and bonding -deference/submission and feeling safe/protected -masculinity, it signals high testosterone and DHT levels -eliminates/reduces stress All of these are either already in DMSI or could be added, so far DMSI has: -status -sexual attraction -masculinity All that's missing, at least as far as we know from the testing phase, is -trust and bonding -deference/submission/feeling protected -eliminate stress Trust and bonding might be why some guys are getting a negative reaction and hostile treatment from other men, they see you as a threat instead of a leader or ally. Might also be why DMSI seems to favor milfs more than younger women, older women trust themselves and most social situations while younger women tend to be vastly more insecure and think everything is creepy. Feeling protected and eliminating stress in women is a natural response of being in the good graces of an alpha male. Other men respect him so they will respect her, and he's got things under control so she can let loose and have fun instead of worrying about the small things. I said it in another thread but one of the fastest ways for sex to happen is to just show a girl a good time, that's how most people end up hooking up without trying - they're having fun together and sex is just part of it. Any man knows it's hard to get sex when your fwb/girlfriend/wife is stressed out and worried about tiny and insignificant things. Go back through maxim interviews with supermodels and you'll see it over and over again, they like a guy who can make them laugh (fun to be around) and who makes them feel safe. I think it's especially true for attractive women who do to their looks face more social pressure and higher expectations. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - bits - 11-01-2016 (11-01-2016, 04:26 PM)Shannon Wrote: I theoretically can target specific end result pheromones, but it would require a vastly more complex method than I use right now. Right now I am using the equivalent of a hardware abstraction later built in to the "operating system", and what would be different is that I would have to "hard code the direct route". Yea that makes perfect sense, we know from lab tests that hormones levels do change based on your own beliefs. Amy Cuddy's testosterone experiments kind of pushed this to the mainstream but before that we know that when you take a lower ranking monkey and force him to be the alpha his dopamine levels shoot straight up. When you take another at low status and give it ketamine (creates more dopamine) he again rises to the top. It seems like you can either change your chemistry or your beliefs but either way you'll end up influencing the other. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Bookstacks DC737 - 11-01-2016 (11-01-2016, 04:31 PM)CatMan Wrote: I can pay to send it to a high end laboratory so it's formula can be determined once and for all. (11-01-2016, 04:39 PM)Shannon Wrote: I have two partial bottles of Revision 17 and one bottle that is unlabeled as to revision. One of the R23's has been stored in the freezer, and one has not. Y'all thinking what I'm thinking? ![]() RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - bits - 11-01-2016 (11-01-2016, 04:31 PM)CatMan Wrote:(11-01-2016, 03:54 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:(11-01-2016, 03:09 PM)CatMan Wrote:(11-01-2016, 02:33 PM)posh Wrote: you can't get it. The product got changed and now it doesn't work here the full story: http://houseofpheromones.com/androtics-direct-review-scam-a314-pherotalk/ Androtics does have a problem keeping it's formulas stable but to their credit they missed out on this molecule because it became more regulated although not impossible to obtain. Somebody else is already very close to revers engineering it and making available for sale again. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - SargeMaximus - 11-01-2016 (11-01-2016, 04:42 PM)bits Wrote:(11-01-2016, 01:24 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: Holy shit! Yes, this is EXACTLY what we want in DMSI, especially the bolded. But I don't understand, why can't they just go back to the old formula? Are they missing ingredients or something? Lost the recipe perhaps? lol (11-01-2016, 04:42 PM)bits Wrote: As for recreating these effects with DMSI if Shannon can target specific pheromones to increase in production then that would be one way. People who are high status do have a different pheromone and energy about them, this is why when you wear high status pheromones people assume you're rich, important, powerful, famous, etc. Even if they've never met anyone powerful/famous and don't have a baseline to know how such a person would come across they just get a primal response. Masculinity is missing as well no? DMSI doesn't seem as grounded and masculine as AM is. (11-01-2016, 04:42 PM)bits Wrote: Trust and bonding might be why some guys are getting a negative reaction and hostile treatment from other men, they see you as a threat instead of a leader or ally. Might also be why DMSI seems to favor milfs more than younger women, older women trust themselves and most social situations while younger women tend to be vastly more insecure and think everything is creepy. Interesting. I've not had trouble with men for quite a while. I remember it was always something I had to deal with in sales but it's seemed to quiet down. I agree that younger women need to be targeted better. (11-01-2016, 04:42 PM)bits Wrote: Feeling protected and eliminating stress in women is a natural response of being in the good graces of an alpha male. Other men respect him so they will respect her, and he's got things under control so she can let loose and have fun instead of worrying about the small things. Does a woman have to earn the good graces tho? Through sex for example? And as for having things under control, I don't know if that's true, because there are many "alpha" types whose lives are in shambles. What "it" is exactly is still elusive, at least for me. Unless it's just a matter of feeling like you have things under control, or feeling at ease, in which case, that would make sense. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - SargeMaximus - 11-01-2016 (11-01-2016, 04:51 PM)Bookstacks DC737 Wrote:(11-01-2016, 04:31 PM)CatMan Wrote: I can pay to send it to a high end laboratory so it's formula can be determined once and for all. OMG... do it. :o (11-01-2016, 04:56 PM)bits Wrote:(11-01-2016, 04:31 PM)CatMan Wrote:(11-01-2016, 03:54 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:(11-01-2016, 03:09 PM)CatMan Wrote:(11-01-2016, 02:33 PM)posh Wrote: you can't get it. The product got changed and now it doesn't work here the full story: http://houseofpheromones.com/androtics-direct-review-scam-a314-pherotalk/ Regulated eh? Suspicious lol. Good to hear it might be available again, though I imagine it will be pricey. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-01-2016 It is a natural law that the more valuable something is, the more the Powers That Be will want to regulate (control) it. |