![]() |
Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Volume-3) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 01-31-2019 (01-31-2019, 05:34 PM)findingme Wrote: Shannon, Sounds like you answered your own question here. Quote:I'm hoping LTU will train me to love, like, and value myself--so I won't seek it from anybody/everyone else. I know LTU is unisex, but how do you think it might help me in my self-valuing and self-belief? I don't see why not. It deals directly with all of those things. I think it will be very helpful for those. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Catman - 01-31-2019 (01-31-2019, 07:20 PM)Roy Wrote: I'm sure people will buy penis enlargement subliminal that also manifests steaks and potatoes. Please build it Shannon. No need for the rest of the stuff in LTU. ![]() RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 01-31-2019 (01-31-2019, 06:48 PM)Roy Wrote:(01-31-2019, 09:21 AM)Shannon Wrote:(01-31-2019, 08:01 AM)THolt Wrote:(01-31-2019, 07:56 AM)Shannon Wrote:(01-31-2019, 07:28 AM)Greenduck Wrote: But if I am loosing focus on the goal of becoming emotionally healthy, and having other goals in mind from time to time, based on other people's accomplishments, wouldnt that Compromise the goal of the subliminal? Incorrect. I do not eat my ribeyes with potatoes. Potatoes are an inferior choice of sides for such a magnificent cut of meat. And the acronym is JJSGELCOFNNSLLFLKFLSMNDVPWEOIFNLKNCONEFOIWENFS. Get with the program already! Remember. It's not a steak. It's a ribeye. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Benjamin - 01-31-2019 (01-31-2019, 07:28 PM)CatMan Wrote:(01-31-2019, 07:20 PM)Roy Wrote: I'm sure people will buy penis enlargement subliminal that also manifests steaks and potatoes. Please build it Shannon. No need for the rest of the stuff in LTU. Catman, please leave some penis size for the rest of us! ![]() RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 01-31-2019 (01-31-2019, 07:20 PM)Roy Wrote:(01-31-2019, 07:06 PM)Have at ye Wrote: With penis enlargement, due to popular demand. It needs to manifest ribeye and prime rib, not potatoes. Maybe snow crab and king crab. Or maybe all four. Mmmmmm. I'm off to go manifest some crab and steak. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - 4Kingdoms - 01-31-2019 https://subliminal-talk.com/Thread-Men-s-Journals-Shannon-s-Journal-Volume-2-?pid=215332#pid215332 Shannon Wrote:I have finished calculating the price for LTU 4.0 in 5.5G. It will be introduced at a price of $600, but that price may go up in the future at some point if it performs as I expect it to. For now, I think $600 is a good balance point between what the models were showing as the best long term price (more than $600) and the best short term price ($600). RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - 4Kingdoms - 01-31-2019 Shannon Wrote:Loops per day for LTU 4.0 in 5.5G is: 6.0. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - 4Kingdoms - 01-31-2019 SURPRISE!! https://subliminal-talk.com/Thread-Men-s-Journals-Shannon-s-Journal-Volume-2-?pid=215340#pid215340 Shannon Wrote:I am almost finished with the description, but I am too tired to continue. Will finish and publish in the morning. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - wolverine_i_am - 01-31-2019 (01-31-2019, 10:13 PM)4Kingdoms Wrote: SURPRISE!! I just wanna say something, that a lot of us are probably already thinking too. This reposting thing is getting really annoying. You reposted this exact post from Shannon's vol 2 thread into my journal too, before editing it out and pretending it was a double post. Most of us are subscribed to all the important threads and are updated with the latest news. We don't need these reposts all over the forum, especially not in my own journal where it's solely for MY OWN updates. Thanks. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Have at ye - 01-31-2019 Woo, congrats on finishing LTU 5.5g, gonna be a doozy. Also the auric shielding extravaganza sounds very, very niiiiiice. ![]() RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 01-31-2019 wolverine_i_am, 4kingdoms isn't doing anyone any harm reposting. And if he double posted in your journal, trust me, it wasn't pretended. Just because it annoys you doesn't mean it isn't useful. More than once I have found his posts very helpful. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - wolverine_i_am - 01-31-2019 (01-31-2019, 10:29 PM)Shannon Wrote: wolverine_i_am, 4kingdoms isn't doing anyone any harm reposting. And if he double posted in your journal, trust me, it wasn't pretended. Just because it annoys you doesn't mean it isn't useful. More than once I have found his posts very helpful. I understand where you're coming from Shannon. Although I was the only one who saw 4kingdom's post on my journal before he quickly edited it out, and it wasn't a double post at all. It was a different post. First one was something about the noble prize, which was fine. But the second one was a repost of from your Shannon vol 2 thread. That was when I decided to speak up and say it was not necessary for that to be posted in my journal. If you or Ben are able to look into the edit history, you'll see what I'm saying. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Benjamin - 01-31-2019 (01-31-2019, 10:21 PM)wolverine_i_am Wrote:(01-31-2019, 10:13 PM)4Kingdoms Wrote: SURPRISE!! Really? In your journal, ok that's fine. But it is actually helpful, because you know some people keep asking the same questions even if it is posted in Shannon's journal. And I actually seen it when he posted it before seeing it in Shannon's journal and I thought 'cool'. Attitudes like this are driving good people away, especially people who are helpful. What's much more annoying is seeing advice on women all over the forum in different journals from someone who hasnt had sex. Which results in unhelpful advice. And I know i'm not the only one who finds that annoying. Usually I just ignore it but if you want to drive someone away who's helpful then I won't. Seriously.. you starting an argument over that and dedicating several posts to doing so shouldn't even be happening. You've gone past simply asking him to making several posts about it. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - wolverine_i_am - 02-01-2019 (01-31-2019, 11:01 PM)Benjamin Wrote: Really? In your journal, ok that's fine. But it is actually helpful, because you know some people keep asking the same questions even if it is posted in Shannon's journal. And I actually seen it when he posted it before seeing it in Shannon's journal and I thought 'cool'. Yeah if he wants to post it on the shannon's journal discussion volume 3 thread, I agree that's fine. I can also see what you mean about informing others who don't read the forum, although I also prefer to keep my journal free of excessive posts that are unrelated to my journal, which is what I'm saying. By the way, I've noticed you fixed up my journal and removed the extra posts, so thanks and I appreciate that. ![]() I can see how my journal may come across as giving advice, but it's not what I'm going for at all. It's about detailing my experiences throughout the dating process, my findings and struggles. I don't claim to be good with women. Although I do understand my journals can be very lengthy and I may come across as preachy about my ideas. From now on, I'll stick to reporting experiences and results, so that it won't come across as giving advice. Regarding the PUA thing, I have always stated I'm very against that and I'm the furthest thing from it. PUAs are into lines and techniques, which is against my nature. I'm just like every other guy who interacts with women, but it doesn't label me as PUA. I admit I overreacted when I took my complaint onto this thread. I should have ignored it and let it go. So I apologise for causing a fuss here. ![]() |