![]() |
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Benjamin - 10-12-2016 Quote:Now, as you are also changing the energy source, do you consider a 2.5 healing-on-version some time after taking vacation? I am asking because initially you didn't want to change anything but the healing to have better comparison. But now, as several things changed and you found out that 2.4 energy source isn't effective in long term anyway this would also serve you to get the difference between healing-on and healing-off version. And the delayed release of the healing version would give you some data of the non-healing version first. That would make it even more difficult for me not to switch if it had healing. ![]() RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - bits - 10-12-2016 Yea I think if there is a new energy source 2.5 should have healing to see what it does first, we dont want to end up in a situation where the new energy source would have had a very high success rate but because there was no healing the aura was off or guys couldnt handle it so its deemed a failure or healing was never an issue this whole time and the real issue has been the energy required and healing didnt have any negative effects on the aura. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 10-12-2016 I am going to release 2.5 without clearing modules activated, and then work on 3.0. Any hope of getting correlative data from 2.5 because of healing being turned off died when I realized that without adjustments, people would not care about it enough to make it worth my time to even build. I'd really just like to build and work on 3.0.1. But you guys need something different. At least this gives me some new data. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Benjamin - 10-12-2016 (10-11-2016, 04:10 PM)Benjamin Wrote:(10-10-2016, 06:47 PM)Shannon Wrote:(10-10-2016, 04:04 PM)Benjamin Wrote: Shannon, i'm wondering your thoughts on this as it's a little strange. Quote:Consider your circumstances I thought about it and didn't come up with much. But later in the day I had a realization. I guess at this point i'm posting it as it's an experiment i'm doing to see how it goes and you may be curious about the results.. as none of the things I described in the end were happening before just changing to day listening. From my journal. Cut a few unrelated parts out. Quote:I'm now having different thoughts about my listening only during the day. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - maxx55 - 10-12-2016 Two questions Shannon. 1. Since the energy source for 2.4 is short term, does that affect the healing or just purely the generation of the aura? I don't want the healing to be stifled. 2. You mentioned that 4 or 5 new girls manifested in your life and are trying to bed you. How do you know they are manifestations? Of course, if they're pursuing you, then they most likely are. But do you know they're manifestations when you first meet them? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Cozy - 10-12-2016 (10-02-2016, 06:19 PM)Shannon Wrote:(10-02-2016, 03:35 PM)Banksy Wrote: Shannon, I’d like to get your thoughts on this. Shannon I have a question, would aura of dominance give you the power you need to get the wealth? I remember using dominance and being a hit with the ladies for a bit, even bagging a woman 9 years older than me by cold approach after like 1 1/2 dates. I was 20 she was 29, and literally one of the most beautiful women I've ever seen. I remember a woman (older then me) telling me she loves me (In a serious way) after knowing me for like a couple hours. I imagine the same would apply for wealth? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - chaosvrgn - 10-12-2016 Couple'a questions, Shannon: 1. How many licks does it take to get to the center of a Tootsie Pop and would the carbs affect the aura? 2. What is the meaning of life, existence and the universe and will knowing the answer get me laid? 3. How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood. Vagina. Awaiting your answers eagerly. #BoredWhileWaitingForTwoPointFive RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - WIP68 - 10-12-2016 (10-12-2016, 11:57 AM)chaosvrgn Wrote: Couple'a questions, Shannon: I personally find Question 1 ambiguous. Please define 'center.' Do you mean the nuget, or the stick? Also... Question 2 What is the meaning of life? is answered in Question 3....Vagina. In Question 3, I need to know the personality type of said woodchuck, and is he 'stonewalling' chucking said wood? Does he have a deep seated hatred for this wood stemming from previous wood related trauma? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shawn - 10-12-2016 Lol, you guys are really bored. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - chaosvrgn - 10-12-2016 (10-12-2016, 12:37 PM)Mr. Anderson Wrote: Lol, you guys are really bored. Bruh, I'm watching PAWN STARS on Hulu. Mayyyynnnnnneeee, you just don't know. SHANNON I SUMMON THEE. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - SargeMaximus - 10-12-2016 (10-12-2016, 12:42 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote:(10-12-2016, 12:37 PM)Mr. Anderson Wrote: Lol, you guys are really bored. No porn chaos? That always works for me. ![]() RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Cozy - 10-12-2016 (10-12-2016, 11:57 AM)chaosvrgn Wrote: Couple'a questions, Shannon: ![]() RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - THolt - 10-12-2016 (10-12-2016, 11:57 AM)chaosvrgn Wrote: Couple'a questions, Shannon: Real deep pondering going on there.... RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - chaosvrgn - 10-12-2016 (10-12-2016, 01:02 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:(10-12-2016, 12:42 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote:(10-12-2016, 12:37 PM)Mr. Anderson Wrote: Lol, you guys are really bored. Nah man. I've been NO FAP for over a year. #secretsrevealed |