![]() |
Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Thread-Vol-5) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Wiseg9999 - 01-30-2020 very interesting. i am 6 months in remission from cancer. so its important for me to find the reasons and the beliefs that are causing this vs the other times ive used your sub. How can i do that? also, if i use MHS for 3 months, will these beliefs be broken down? (01-27-2020, 10:10 AM)Shannon Wrote:(01-26-2020, 07:23 AM)Wiseg9999 Wrote: Hi Shannon, i have been feeling down ever since starting MHS 5.75. I havent felt like this for years. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 01-30-2020 (01-30-2020, 03:04 PM)Wiseg9999 Wrote: very interesting. i am 6 months in remission from cancer. Please respond after the text of what you are responding to. Otherwise it breaks the flow of response, and doesn't necessarily make sense. I don't have enough information to know which of those possible reasons is what is going on. Without that, I don't know how to answer your question. The longer you use MHS v2, the better your chances of clearing out the emotional issues if they are based on changing old beliefs that the program is trying to change into beliefs that help you become healthy, though. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Have at ye - 02-01-2020 Awesome you're feeling better. ![]() RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 02-01-2020 (02-01-2020, 08:20 AM)Have at ye Wrote: Awesome you're feeling better. Indeed. I'm still trying to get the predictive models back on track right now. This has been a very expensive flu. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - AbundanceCH - 02-01-2020 Is an update to UMS in the cards anytime soon? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Griffin - 02-01-2020 (02-01-2020, 11:40 AM)AbundanceCH Wrote: Is an update to UMS in the cards anytime soon? +1 would love to know this too! RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Darwinn - 02-02-2020 Hey Shannon, Nothing major to say as i'm not big on reporting now, talking about everything gets me in my head and starts to mess with my results and focus. Nevertheless i just want to express the gratitude i feel. I've said it before but living all my life with a mind which doesn't work as i want it to and no sense of self esteem has been such an unhappy task. MLS and SE have really given me what i've always needed so badly. I know you're on a mission and that entails shooting for something much higher than where you are now and in that disappointment will hit at times. Still i want you to know that were you just to give it up now, what you've already produced is enough to turn a lot of lives around. So thank you, Shannon. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 02-02-2020 (02-01-2020, 11:40 AM)AbundanceCH Wrote: Is an update to UMS in the cards anytime soon? Right now I am working on proving that the models are stable and accurate. So far 2 of the three tests have been carried out, and have proven accurate. Once I get that done, I am going to finish building ALRA and then work on finishing FRM 4.9. At that point, the gates open up for a lot of different things, including UMS v2. When it will get built, I'm not sure, but it probably won't be too terribly long. One thing I have been thinking about is that I have been trying to pack a lot into single stages and that seems to be hitting snags, at least partly because around 3 months in, the subconscious gets tired of hearing the same thing. And I can't say as I blame it. So I'm looking at producing big programs (UMS, LTU, etc.) as multi-stage sets again. That means it will take longer to build, but I think that will have better results overall. I think it would need at least 3 stages, possibly 4 or 6. Not sure yet. But that would seem to potentially be a better way forward for making it work, instead of trying to achieve everything all in one stage. Of course there would also be the "+1" stage, where all the other stages are packed into one for you to use after you have stepped up to it. But it seems to me that we should be getting better results, and I think that is probably the solution. I'm going to try to get FRM built asap, because that's been a bottleneck for a while now, but it's a very complicated thing and I have to make sure I am using accurate modeling results. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 02-02-2020 (02-02-2020, 02:27 AM)Darwin Wrote: Hey Shannon, Thank you. I'm not so much disappointed with what I have accomplished, as I am with the years long series of BS events that have gotten in my way of being productive to my full capacity. I am not giving up, just recovering from the last one to hit me. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Rossignol17 - 02-02-2020 (02-02-2020, 09:10 AM)Shannon Wrote:(02-01-2020, 11:40 AM)AbundanceCH Wrote: Is an update to UMS in the cards anytime soon? Hi Shannon, This is an interesting realization and intuitively, it feels right to me. All the improvements you have worked on should have the made the programs MORE effective, not less. I have been really curious as to why the only program that worked for me (phenomenally well !!) has been USLM3. I know I executed that program beautifully, so I do not believe that it is as simple as me resisting the others I tried.........USLM4, USLM4.1, and UMS, and I know I am not the only one who has experienced this. But perhaps there is the point of "information overload" with the newer subs and that may trigger them to fail ? How will it work for those of us who have purchased USLM4 and UMS, with regard to the upgrades ? I know you mentioned that USLM4.2 would be a free upgrade for those of us who purchased USLM4, but what about UMS ? Would they BOTH be rebuilt as multi-stage sets ? I am currently back on USLM3, and I have NOT asked for any refunds for UMS or USLM4. I really just want the programs to work as intended and I am keeping the faith that you can get them there. Thanks ! RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - HMoody - 02-02-2020 (02-02-2020, 09:10 AM)Shannon Wrote:(02-01-2020, 11:40 AM)AbundanceCH Wrote: Is an update to UMS in the cards anytime soon? Shannon - this caught my eye. How did you determine that the subconscious gets bored at the 3 month mark? And if it does...how much is progress impeded by that boredom? Would it make sense to switch to a different program every 3 months to increase results? I've been on UMS since the start of it's introduction but haven't seen much in the way of actual real world effects at all so far. Would switching to the latest DMSI for 3 months and then coming back to UMS perhaps increase effects even though both are geared at different goals? Just trying to think of ways to achieve actual results. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 02-02-2020 (02-02-2020, 11:36 AM)Rossignol17 Wrote:(02-02-2020, 09:10 AM)Shannon Wrote:(02-01-2020, 11:40 AM)AbundanceCH Wrote: Is an update to UMS in the cards anytime soon? The only difference between USLM 3 and the higher versions is that they are more optimized. The only reason they would not work as well is if they were not being executed as well, and the only reason that could be is... something in the script is triggering fear, and thus resistance. UMS is very clearly triggering resistance, which doesn't surprise me, given what it's trying to do. Especially in just one stage. I was hoping to make it possible to make single stage programs that were massive like that and have them work, but I guess the step up method is going to have to be what we use in those cases. Unless I can make FRM work significantly better in 4.9, but even then stepping up makes sense. Quote:How will it work for those of us who have purchased USLM4 and UMS, with regard to the upgrades ? I know you mentioned that USLM4.2 would be a free upgrade for those of us who purchased USLM4, but what about UMS ? Would they BOTH be rebuilt as multi-stage sets ? I don't know how things will be done yet or how we will handle the upgrades, but I'm not interested in making people who paid for 4.x of USLM and didn't have it work well pay more. I don't see USLM being multi stage, either. Quote:I am currently back on USLM3, and I have NOT asked for any refunds for UMS or USLM4. I really just want the programs to work as intended and I am keeping the faith that you can get them there. Thanks ! I appreciate that. That is the goal. I think what I do for the next version of USLM 4.x will solve the issues that the 4.x series was having. UMS is going to need a considerable amount of work to upgrade. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Greenduck - 02-03-2020 Can’t the argument that “the subconscious get bored of listening to the script” not just be an instance of resistance? I’ve listened to LTU for more than ten months and still get benefits from it. However I take longer breaks from time to time when I feel it’s needed, for a week or longer. Seems to work well for me. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 02-03-2020 (02-03-2020, 12:48 PM)Greenduck Wrote: Can’t the argument that “the subconscious get bored of listening to the script” not just be an instance of resistance? I’ve listened to LTU for more than ten months and still get benefits from it. However I take longer breaks from time to time when I feel it’s needed, for a week or longer. Seems to work well for me. Different personalities respond different ways. Some get bored faster than others; some never get bored. Some crave constant change, and some hate any change at all. In cases where you have someone who has a mind or personality that works in such a high entropy manner, boredom can set in in 3 months and sometimes less, and cause problems. It is a form of resistance, but one motivated by seeking constant difference in stimulation. Not motivated by fear. So we chalk it up to the needs of that particular personality type. |