(01-26-2020, 04:04 AM)Zane Wrote: Everyone Send Positive Vibes to @Shannon

(01-26-2020, 07:23 AM)Wiseg9999 Wrote: Hi Shannon, i have been feeling down ever since starting MHS 5.75. I havent felt like this for years.
Then I remembered resistance - or whatever you call it now.
Could it be MHS be causing me emotional turmoil?! If so, why and how?
thanks.

(01-26-2020, 08:33 AM)Javier Gerardo Wrote:

(01-26-2020, 07:23 AM)Wiseg9999 Wrote: Hi Shannon, i have been feeling down ever since starting MHS 5.75. I havent felt like this for years.
Then I remembered resistance - or whatever you call it now.
Could it be MHS be causing me emotional turmoil?! If so, why and how?
thanks.

I'm interested with this as well. I'm also using MHS 5.75 but at the start the pain of my sickness kind of increased but two weeks in and it is improving. Today wasn't a good day though since pain have somehow increased.

(01-26-2020, 09:25 AM)ichigo Wrote: Hi Shannon, what sub would you recommend would best help a police detective in their job? To maximise observational skills, come up with hypothesis, etc. I was thinking MLS or LFC? Is there anyway they can be combined? If not which would you recommend? Thank you

(01-26-2020, 11:18 AM)cataleya Wrote: Shannon, how long should the break be if I switch from UMS to US/LM3?

(01-26-2020, 02:04 PM)Greenduck Wrote: Hi Shannon.

I gave your new pricing strategy some thought:

I’ve run LTU for a year and I can say that the price of usd1500 is fair. But two problems arise when setting the price to that
1) it’s almost impossible to communicate the value of a product fully, especially when it’s something so personal as related to your emotional health, and life.
2) subliminals isn’t a common thing to use so people may be a bit sceptic to it

Let’s say that the marketing factor diminish the value by 30% and the unconventional method of using subliminals diminish the value by 30%. Then you have 1500*0,4=600 left. I think that’s a better price to sell LTU for, for at least some more time until you have gotten clinical trials going. LTU is helluva product and by setting the price as high as you have you loose out on getting first time customers using the pinnacle of your products, which is what you need to do to create people who advocate not only your business but your type of product that is largely unknown to most people.

(01-27-2020, 10:32 AM)Shannon Wrote:

(01-26-2020, 02:04 PM)Greenduck Wrote: Hi Shannon.

I gave your new pricing strategy some thought:

I’ve run LTU for a year and I can say that the price of usd1500 is fair. But two problems arise when setting the price to that
1) it’s almost impossible to communicate the value of a product fully, especially when it’s something so personal as related to your emotional health, and life.
2) subliminals isn’t a common thing to use so people may be a bit sceptic to it

Let’s say that the marketing factor diminish the value by 30% and the unconventional method of using subliminals diminish the value by 30%. Then you have 1500*0,4=600 left. I think that’s a better price to sell LTU for, for at least some more time until you have gotten clinical trials going. LTU is helluva product and by setting the price as high as you have you loose out on getting first time customers using the pinnacle of your products, which is what you need to do to create people who advocate not only your business but your type of product that is largely unknown to most people.

Using your logic, we can pull any number out of a hat and use it in place of your 30%.  You start with an admission that the current price is fair, and then go on to make arguments to lower the price, which are all already negated by your initial statement that the price is fair.  The arguments you make for lowering the price are based on conjecture, and use what are effectively random numbers.  We could easily adjust those numbers up or down to arrive at whatever number we want to.  Interesting that you arrived at the original introductory price of $600 US.  

I see your argument and understand it, but your reasoning is suspect, as is your result.

Now that said, the next time I release this program the price will be different because since releasing that program, I have become aware of some variables that were not available to me to consider, which may force me to use a price that is other than optimal.  We shall see how that plays out when the time comes.

(01-27-2020, 11:15 AM)Greenduck Wrote:

(01-27-2020, 10:32 AM)Shannon Wrote:

(01-26-2020, 02:04 PM)Greenduck Wrote: Hi Shannon.

I gave your new pricing strategy some thought:

I’ve run LTU for a year and I can say that the price of usd1500 is fair. But two problems arise when setting the price to that
1) it’s almost impossible to communicate the value of a product fully, especially when it’s something so personal as related to your emotional health, and life.
2) subliminals isn’t a common thing to use so people may be a bit sceptic to it

Let’s say that the marketing factor diminish the value by 30% and the unconventional method of using subliminals diminish the value by 30%. Then you have 1500*0,4=600 left. I think that’s a better price to sell LTU for, for at least some more time until you have gotten clinical trials going. LTU is helluva product and by setting the price as high as you have you loose out on getting first time customers using the pinnacle of your products, which is what you need to do to create people who advocate not only your business but your type of product that is largely unknown to most people.

Using your logic, we can pull any number out of a hat and use it in place of your 30%.  You start with an admission that the current price is fair, and then go on to make arguments to lower the price, which are all already negated by your initial statement that the price is fair.  The arguments you make for lowering the price are based on conjecture, and use what are effectively random numbers.  We could easily adjust those numbers up or down to arrive at whatever number we want to.  Interesting that you arrived at the original introductory price of $600 US.  

I see your argument and understand it, but your reasoning is suspect, as is your result.

Now that said, the next time I release this program the price will be different because since releasing that program, I have become aware of some variables that were not available to me to consider, which may force me to use a price that is other than optimal.  We shall see how that plays out when the time comes.

Yes I used an arbitrary logic in specific sum you should arrive at, that wasn't the point I was trying to make. My point is that:
a) you have an awesome product that can help people
b) I've talked to people about the product that I know would have benefit of it, but few have shown further interest

So you have people that would have use of your product, but can't understand it's value to them. It's not like you are selling a Tesla which someone can write a review about and people can digest that based on other experiences they have with cars, they have a framework to conduct their discussions around the product on. There is almost no framework for discussing subliminals, maybe in the absolute inner circle of users such as on this forum, but that is a very small portion of "people".

I don't know if you heard about the Diffusion of innovations (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diffusion_of_innovations) but I think that your type of product and us buying your products can be plotter fairly accurate on that chart. We are what is called "innovators" - i.e. people ready to be in the first line to test innovative stuff - the same type of guys that stood in line for the new iPhone for 3 days. Guys that most other people see as "lunatics". What I'm trying to convey to you is that you need to help take your customer base from being innovators (which is about 2.5 % of the overall population) and reach the "early adopters" (13.5% of the population) - and the best way you can do that is to put out high quality products on a price point that isn't necessary calculated for "optimum value", but at a price point where this group would be willing to try it out.

Finding the optimal price point is a later question to do. Thanks to AP you can even raise prices even when you have tons of customers that bought on a lower price (because your products have that high incremental value). So pricing the LTU, which I believe is the product that have the highest possibility of reaching the early adoptors to high isn't a viable long term strategy to reach over the "tipping point" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tipping_point_(sociology)) as malcolm gladwell describes it, neither a necessary one for your monetary success in the long term. Just my five cents.

Quote:But what I would like to see in the shop is a certain "people who used this program had the following benefits after usage of 3-6 months:" and then a list. At the moment it is just a list of goals what the program tries to achieve but not a list of the goals that were achieved. I know it's not easy to get field data and feedback from customers to make such a list. But maybe also for people here on the forum, if they use a program for long enough and they write a detailed review they get a $10 voucher for the shop or something like that. I know that might also mislead people that try to take advantage of that but if they bought a program and they can verify it, then you can allow it to them. Maybe only reviews for the latest generation or 5.5 and up. I don't know. I think there are a lot of intelligent supportive forum users that want you to succeed, Shannon, maybe we can help coming up with ideas and you can choose what you like or just ignore it.

(01-27-2020, 10:20 AM)Shannon Wrote:

(01-26-2020, 09:25 AM)ichigo Wrote: Hi Shannon, what sub would you recommend would best help a police detective in their job? To maximise observational skills, come up with hypothesis, etc. I was thinking MLS or LFC? Is there anyway they can be combined? If not which would you recommend? Thank you

Those two are the ones I would most likely suggest also.

LFC is going to focus your awareness on whatever you are focusing on like a laser.  It can improve your ability to notice things you are looking for, but may create so much focus that you would not longer notice things you aren't looking for.  It can potentially create a sort of "tunnel vision" effect, both literally in your visual awareness and in terms of what you notice.  

MLS would be better for the thinking aspects of the job, and may help with observation also.

If I were said police detective, I would start with MLS and then once it was established that it was helpful in the right ways or not, try LFC.  If MLS does prove to be useful, wait for its effects to be established before you attempt to add in LFC.  And IF you try to add it in, you will need to do so in a carefully balanced way to get any benefit without derailing the programs.  I would suggest alternating one cycle of MLS and one of LFC.  Keep in mind that doing that may completely derail the program that is not being used.  If it does, you'll have to choose one or the other.  It may also cause turbulence issues.  So proceed with caution if you try that.

(01-28-2020, 12:39 PM)Shannon Wrote:

Quote:But what I would like to see in the shop is a certain "people who used this program had the following benefits after usage of 3-6 months:" and then a list. At the moment it is just a list of goals what the program tries to achieve but not a list of the goals that were achieved. I know it's not easy to get field data and feedback from customers to make such a list. But maybe also for people here on the forum, if they use a program for long enough and they write a detailed review they get a $10 voucher for the shop or something like that. I know that might also mislead people that try to take advantage of that but if they bought a program and they can verify it, then you can allow it to them. Maybe only reviews for the latest generation or 5.5 and up. I don't know. I think there are a lot of intelligent supportive forum users that want you to succeed, Shannon, maybe we can help coming up with ideas and you can choose what you like or just ignore it.

Unfortunately, there is no way to do this.  Without incentivising it, we won't get the reports, and if we do incentivize it we (and our customers) have no way to know it's genuine.  Nobody is going to believe "paid for" reports anyway, and that would only serve to damage our reputation and trust the public has for us.  Believe me, we have been through every possible angle on this, and there is no good solution there that we can see.