Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - AlphaMind - 11-21-2015 (11-20-2015, 10:24 AM)Natious Wrote: Never the less I think AM should get an upgrade, I personally had no results with it. That makes me think that I am one of the more resistant types, or just not in the place where AM6 could effectively make a difference, hence the long OF run. You do realize that AM6 includes slipstream and naturalizer in 5G format right? I do not want to disregard your result(s), but have you ever really contemplate regarding you AM6's run (and really consider the existence of slipstream and naturalizer)? From all the disappointment in the forum it could leads to confirmation bias. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Natious - 11-21-2015 (11-21-2015, 06:36 AM)AlphaMind Wrote:(11-20-2015, 10:24 AM)Natious Wrote: Never the less I think AM should get an upgrade, I personally had no results with it. That makes me think that I am one of the more resistant types, or just not in the place where AM6 could effectively make a difference, hence the long OF run. I did consider that, I took a break after AM6 to reflect on the whole run. And the time I ran AM, if i remember correctly there weren't many or any finished runs, at least when I started that was. Otherwise I'd be having at least 2 runs of AM by now if not on my third. But as I said, I don't blame the sub for it, not all people are ready to hop on AM6 pretty much right after joining the community. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Womanizer - 11-21-2015 @Natious I remember reading somewhere that took Shannon 8 runs to get where he wanted to be. You're just going to have to keep doing it over and over. Also it may depend on your prior beliefs system. For example I believe that anything is possible , but it doesn't It mean it will happen. I also like the idea of running MLS 4G or 5g for at least 3 months my logic is that the material from 6 stages will be better absorbed. For anxiety look at a supplement called phenibut. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Womanizer - 11-21-2015 For future subs a forum user mentioned Bedroom mastery , i think that would be a kool sub. Stop premature ejaculation , increase your penis size , nsfm , Testorene maximizer , DAOS ; designed to make a men become a bedroom llion. Am I copying Sex magnet? Manifest integrous friends , because where you surround yourself matters. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Daredevil - 11-21-2015 (11-21-2015, 07:41 AM)Womanizer Wrote: @Natious It took him 8 runs combined of different AM 2008- AM5 Which means he didn't have the power in the earlier subs and the bulletpoints weren't that's lengthy. He also did many other Subs like ASC before AM. I think the AM set should be used for 2-3 years straight with 2 week breaks in between each finished run. That's why I'm gonna use it for 1 year straight. Do another sub for a year and do AM for 3 years straight. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Nox - 11-21-2015 (11-21-2015, 07:41 AM)Womanizer Wrote: @Natious Sorry if I'm misunderstanding you, but are you saying that you believe that MLS will help with learning/absorbing AM or other subs? I'm curious because that was my initial impression as well but I haven't seen any other opinions that agree. I'm new here, but my initial plan was to do ERPHA, then MLS, and then move onto to the AM and follow up stuff because I believed that the MLS would make everything faster. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Womanizer - 11-21-2015 (11-21-2015, 08:18 AM)Nox Wrote:(11-21-2015, 07:41 AM)Womanizer Wrote: @Natious In my head it makes sense to use MLS 5g or 4G so you can learn faster because the faster you learn the faster you can adapt. Part of our survival is adapting , learning faster gives you a huge advantage in the world. So it makes sense to me to run it before or after AM. That's what I want to do ; so my inner conflict is run AM shortly and keep the material fresh or MLS so I can maximize the results of my next run. Even if that works which I believe it will hardwork never stops you have to keep doing AM over and over and over. I'm essentially saying persistence no matter what. @ Hercules Yea i want to do the same focus on just AM , but other issues that may have not been handled will arise . I eventually want to do WM, but the core has to be heavily strengthened so the coating looks nice. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Daredevil - 11-21-2015 Shannon gas already stated in this forum that MLS won't make us execute the script faster. Once you hear the script once all you have to do is get enough repititions to start executing that script as the dominant program. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Nox - 11-21-2015 (11-21-2015, 09:02 AM)Hercules Wrote: Shannon gas already stated in this forum that MLS won't make us execute the script faster. Once you hear the script once all you have to do is get enough repititions to start executing that script as the dominant program. Thank you for clarifying this for me. I'd read a few threads but hadn't seen a concrete answer. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Life - 11-21-2015 (11-19-2015, 03:31 AM)Shannon Wrote: I'm the one who coined the term "transcendent alpha", but the concept may not have originated with me. Attract Your Perfect Financially Wealthy Romantic Lover 5G please RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - AlphaRomeo - 11-21-2015 ^^^^ What does your request got to do with that quote? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Benjamin - 11-21-2015 The mp3 player should play it just the same if your headphones are okay.. it may just not last that long if it's only $20. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - CatMan - 11-22-2015 (11-21-2015, 11:49 PM)FrostedFake Wrote: Does it matter if I use a bad quality mp3 player. One like 20 dollars? http://www.amazon.com/G-G-Martinsen-Multi-lingual-Selection-Portable-MP3Player/dp/B0168EBV5Y/ref=sr_1_1?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1448168972&sr=1-1-spons&keywords=mp3+player&psc=1 Just make sure it plays in stereo. I know some of those low cost ones play in mono, amazingly, in 2015! In fact, a guy here (name redacted lol) ruined an entire AM6 run because he never bothered to check the device beforehand and just assumed it was fine. Big mistake. Check it first, and things should be cool, bro. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Benjamin - 11-22-2015 Oh damn.. I never thought of that. That's dodgy if they aren't in stereo. |