![]() |
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - chaosvrgn - 08-19-2016 (08-19-2016, 01:18 PM)4Kingdoms Wrote:(08-19-2016, 01:07 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote: However, when you tell me that I don't have the right to speak because I'm not part of some special class, you're going to get my fist down your throat. A lot of people equate introversion with shyness, but that's not what it means at all (from a cognitive function perspective). Introversion / extroversion refers to where you get your mental energy -- from within, or from external sources. An introvert gets his energy from within, meaning I have to spend significant amounts of time alone to recharge. An extrovert can't do that. When he or she stays inside for a significant amount of time, they become depressed. They get energetic around other people. I become drained by interacting with people and will eventually run and hide. According to recent studies, extroverts tend to make a lot more money. It's not impossible for an introvert to make money, though. It's just a bit different. If you follow the MBTI, each type has their strengths. You have to learn how to capitalize off those strengths. INTJs, for example. Their incredible pattern making ability (Ni) and ability to organize that data into systems that will affect the real world (Te) means that they become the absolute expert at whatever they do (ala Shannon and my former martial arts instructor). I'm an INTP. We're actually a lot different than INTJ's -- our cognitive functions are reversed. I possess Ne and Ti. In other words, I absorb massive amounts of data through extroverted intuition (Ne) and categorizes that data through introverted thinking (Ti), the difference is, I'm fitting that data into an INTERNAL framework -- meaning that I'm capable of creating some pretty astounding mental links between concepts. I have little desire to actually affect the real world. Which means, my greatest offering to the world is theory, not the application of the theory. Think of it like this: Tesla was an INTJ. Einstein was an INTP. That means, I had to find a career that would let me stay detached and observe, make mental leaps, theorize but not apply or execute the theories (that's the P coming into play, we suck at execution). That's how I became a marketing executive. I'm really good at pulling conclusions from data and then passing them off to another type (I almost exclusively hired xSTJ's because of their astounding work ethic) to execute. Two years ago (and I probably shouldn't be saying this because it identifies me), I took six months of a company's visitor traffic (from Google Analytics) and created a formula that detailed how they should write their content to maximize page views. I predicted 150k in a month. They wrote the article. Generated 1.4 million visitors in a week. I charged them an insane amount of money after that, haha. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Sickologist - 08-19-2016 K-Train, Things never escalate quickly, it's all about the previous sub communications and then it builds up. That's interesting, I've noticed some after-glow effects myself. Didn't notice much out of the ordinary until the very few last days up until now. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Churchill - 08-19-2016 Hey guys, quick question: Does the occurrence of static while I play the ultrasonics imply that my subconscious is no longer getting the messages? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - TheChosenOne - 08-19-2016 I've always said that Shannon can't be a "valid tester" in a attraction/manifestation sub because he knows EXACTLY what is in the script EVERY TIME. Therefore, his thinking, attitudes, emotional state, and actions have the potential to be in alignment 100% of the time. No one else really "knows" whats in the script because of trade secrets (which is understandable). A lot of times when he's frustrated and asks why is everyone "resisting so hard" or "not following instructions" this is probably one of the main reasons why (I think he forgets). That, and people are unaware of how the (subconscious) mind is operating/influenced and how "beliefs are created and replaced" (authority figures, brainwaves, repetition, intense emotional states, real-life manifestations, etc) I also understand why people are so obsessed with "healing" outside of true medical/traumatic reasons. A lot of people think they can "heal" all there problems away, until all the problems are gone.... Then, magically they are going to get everything they want out of life. It would be great but we are mortal beings with a limited amount of time on Earth to get things done (at least physically). How much time does a world-class Chef spend "Healing" (a lot less time than his ACTUAL TIME cooking). You can heal every aspect of your life regarding the subject of food/cooking for years and go into the kitchen and still not be able to make one good meal. The problem I'm noticing is Motivation and Confidence not Fear and Healing. "Healing-Therapy-Eliminating Fears" is a very profitable industry. A person doesn't have to be actually broken, you just have to make them believe they are (such as BIG PHARMA and some personal development out there such as Pickup Artist - not all of them). If Shannon said, he would give $200 USD to every woman you approached using DMSI (solo), but you had to give a brief detailed explanation of each approach daily (by 11:59 pm EST) such as location, age, time of day, etc. these conversations about DMSI would be very different. I also bet it would get very competitive very quickly (so, how many did you approach today). NOBODY would be sitting back focused on "healing" or resistance" unless it was an absolute (obvious/definite). The goal in the example above would be (Confidence-Motivation) moving towards perceived pleasure vs (Fear-Healing) running/hiding from perceived pain. There's also this obsession with IOI's (Indicator's of Interest.) Just because a woman shows interest, doesn't mean she's down to have sex with you. Indicator of INTEREST is NOT an Indicator of SEX. Women are "interested" or show signs of "interest" in men for very different reasons. Some for money, some for sex, some for attention, some to use you and manipulate you "because she can", some because they're lonely, some for social status and elevation, some for EGO and self-pride, some for personal revenge, and the list goes on and on.... The goal of this program, is to make a woman APPROACH YOU and ACTIVELY initiate a sexual sequence, regardless of what you look like or are wearing (external circumstances). An IOI is NOT an APPROACH. The picture I got when I heard women APPROACH YOU is either a celebrity/popular vibe (where she won't be socially chastised for approaching you) or for example a stripper, when she makes direct eye contact and starts walking towards you (even though the intention is money). In other words, the approach is very DIRECT and OBVIOUS (like giving someone money vs flashing money at someone). I understand the program isn't finished and it's probably one of the hardest goals to achieve, since it reverses social constraints (in a man's case). It's tough to show results for women also because women are EXPECTED to be approached by men, and most of the time (not always) men already approach with sex in mind. Quantity (of men) would be a woman's measurement if a woman was using the program. But for a man, it would have to be an obvious sexual sequence (not saying it should be an exaggerated throw me down screw me anywhere pornstar type scenario). This program seems to be evolving more towards Sex Magnet (Seducer), than AOSI/DMSI (Seduced). If this is occurring, I can see why people who bought it/contributed to it in the earlier stages would be upset or very critical. Consumers hate stagnation, and the bait-and-switch model which so many people have been "victims" by companies may be "triggering/anchoring" people. I know Shannon will make right on his promises somehow, so I'm not too worried about it. I think the "enjoy the ride" mentality vs "are we there yet" mentality would remove A LOT of blockages for people. I've learned that it's best to get into a "groove" with Shannon and his subs and figure out how to align them with your life/goals and interests, rather than forcing scenarios and timelines. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Catman - 08-19-2016 There's something about this program in particular that brings out the argumentative, petty cattiness and ego/d*ck measuring contests in people. I can't wait for it to be released just so people chill out. This happened the last time when 2.2 was debuting, too. We're all a very small community, on the cusp of human mind development, on a scale that nobody has EVER seen on this planet. Think of our paths to get here, all of our different lives and struggles, and how much we are all benefiting from this incredible opportunity to change here. Guys, this should be a joyous time, we have a new DMSI coming. New and improved, I am grateful for that, it may finally have the power to change my life, and yours too. Let's focus on what's important... RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - chaosvrgn - 08-19-2016 (08-19-2016, 03:56 PM)TheChosenOne Wrote: This program seems to be evolving more towards Sex Magnet (Seducer), than AOSI/DMSI (Seduced). If this is occurring, I can see why people who bought it/contributed to it in the earlier stages would be upset or very critical. Consumers hate stagnation, and the bait-and-switch model which so many people have been "victims" by companies may be "triggering/anchoring" people. This is a fair point -- one that I've been pushing without even really noticing it. I have a natural "hunter" mindset, and subconsciously, I think I might be afraid of the reverse occurring (where women pursue men) because it seems so unnatural. I wonder if that's why we're resisting it so much... RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Acmeisto - 08-19-2016 (08-19-2016, 03:56 PM)TheChosenOne Wrote: I've always said that Shannon can't be a "valid tester" in a attraction/manifestation sub because he knows EXACTLY what is in the script EVERY TIME. Therefore, his thinking, attitudes, emotional state, and actions have the potential to be in alignment 100% of the time. No one else really "knows" whats in the script because of trade secrets (which is understandable). Well, women do approach men. If you have this sex appeal women will make themselves approachable, they will come to near you or they are looking at you in a way that is so super easy to initiate a conversation with them. My first girlfriend approached me in a dance floor and I remember my second girlfriend, we just locked eyes with eachother naturally... If this is not happening it just means your mindset is not strong enough. Of course I do approach women once in a while but usually I will get the most of it from an interaction when there is some eye-contact game beforehand. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - ncbeareatingman - 08-19-2016 I Like your Frank Zappa...Picture/icon....I saw him twice in the 70's the band was so fierce so musically abouve all that I had heard in rock up until that time,that as a drummer at the time,I almost went home and threw my sticks thru the woods,the band was sooo damn good. wow. Frank Zappa !! K-Train, Things never escalate quickly, it's all about the previous sub communications and then it builds up. That's interesting, I've noticed some after-glow effects myself. Didn't notice much out of the ordinary until the very few last days up until now. [/quote] RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Jones - 08-19-2016 (08-19-2016, 01:07 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote: RTBoss: v1 wasn't THAT good. Chaosvrgn, when you say v1, are you referring to "2.1" or DAOSI from back in May? or is there some other version 1? Thanks, RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - chaosvrgn - 08-19-2016 (08-19-2016, 07:23 PM)Jones Wrote:(08-19-2016, 01:07 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote: RTBoss: v1 wasn't THAT good. Referring to DAOSI -- the original from May. With the bombtastic, vagina moistening, bang-a-licious aura. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Jones - 08-19-2016 (08-19-2016, 08:01 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote:(08-19-2016, 07:23 PM)Jones Wrote:(08-19-2016, 01:07 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote: RTBoss: v1 wasn't THAT good. How fast does it work for you? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - chaosvrgn - 08-19-2016 (08-19-2016, 08:02 PM)Jones Wrote:(08-19-2016, 08:01 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote:(08-19-2016, 07:23 PM)Jones Wrote:(08-19-2016, 01:07 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote: RTBoss: v1 wasn't THAT good. I run two loops about 4 hours before going out and I get effects for about 5 days afterward, with the aura's strength peaking after 2.5 days. I suspect that v2.3 is going to be absolutely insane. Hopefully, it comes out tomorrow or Sunday. My AM6 run is coming to an end and I want to run it non-stop for 32 days. I'm hitting a Kanye West concert in Washington D.C. on September 8th, then kicking it there for the weekend. I want that weekend to be my "last call for debauchery" before aggressively pursuing my life goals. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Benjamin - 08-19-2016 Chaos I think you're taking it a little too far with your response with what he said. Technically it is true that being a valid tester for a new version it's hard to know which version is doing which without the rest inbetween. But that doesn't discount results either. But you're going a bit far the way you're talking down to him and the 'nagging wife' attack. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - RTBoss - 08-20-2016 No worries, Ben. If people want to take the results of someone who ran a program a total of 6 times or less over 3 versions in 2 months, all while running another 5G program, and get excited about it - that's up to them. Me, I'd put more stock in other opinions. After another of his temper-tantrums, he's on my block/ignore list, so I won't be seeing anything from him anymore anyway. |