![]() |
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Steven - 08-16-2016 @ Thank you for elaborating. That post was a HUGE help! Here's something I've noticed since using the DMSI series... There are increased signs of attraction and increased arousal, but that is not leading to results such as dates, etc. I am approaching. I get very little Last Minute Resistance, but I get lots of flaking and number resistance. It's odd because I'd think with increased attraction and arousal there would be an increase in women taking action congruent with that arousal and attraction. Your comments and input would be welcome. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - maxx55 - 08-16-2016 (08-16-2016, 03:38 PM)Steven Wrote: @ I know the same experience you describe here all too well. This is why I don't really put any significance with "iois". I'm a bit surprised because from reading your reports you clearly are affecting women differently now than compared to before DMSI. I think that once all those additions that you and others suggested for v3.0 are added, I can't see flaking after they give you their number being an issue. We'll have to wait and see. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 08-16-2016 (08-16-2016, 01:19 PM)Sash Wrote:(08-15-2016, 08:32 PM)Shannon Wrote: I feel the energy. It's less obvious than v1, but noticeable. I also notice I'm burning energy much faster. And I'm noticing people acting differently around me with just a few minutes. Up to 30 feet away, I have seen what appears to have been responses to the aura, even from multiple women at the same time. A mother/daughter combo once, too. Well, I guess we have to listen to Sash on this one. No more updates or releases to DMSI until I get P in the V. A few different times. With girls he finds attractive. (Not women, of course, they're probably too old for his taste.) After all, my journal is only full of IOIs and I kept saying I could have banged her but never did and gave excuse after excuse for not even banging one girl. I should have never released this product If I myself haven't gotten laid from it. Okay, Sash. I'm following your advice. No more updates or releases of DMSI until I finish 3.0 and get laid with at least three different girls (not women) who you find attractive. I'll let you know when I have pictures for you to approve for me, so I can know if they qualify. In the mean time, guys, sucks to be you. It'll be a few months. Maybe. Might take longer. Can't release 2.3 or 2.4 now, obviously. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Aventus45 - 08-16-2016 Shannon is there an ETA on the release for 2.3? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 08-16-2016 (08-16-2016, 04:38 PM)Aventus45 Wrote: Shannon is there an ETA on the release for 2.3? I was going to release it on the 20th or the 21st, but obviously, I can't release it now. Haven't gotten laid at least three times yet. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - K-Train - 08-16-2016 Shannon Wrote:Okay, Sash. I'm following your advice. No more updates or releases of DMSI until I finish 3.0 and get laid with at least three different girls (not women) who you find attractive. I'll let you know when I have pictures for you to approve for me, so I can know if they qualify. I wish I had put some money down cause I knew this was going to happen. Shannon if you're truly not going to release V2.3 I can certainly understand at this point just let me know so I can fire up V2.2 again. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Aventus45 - 08-16-2016 (08-16-2016, 04:59 PM)K-Train Wrote:Shannon Wrote:Okay, Sash. I'm following your advice. No more updates or releases of DMSI until I finish 3.0 and get laid with at least three different girls (not women) who you find attractive. I'll let you know when I have pictures for you to approve for me, so I can know if they qualify. I took it as sarcasm lol. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 08-16-2016 I'm certainly getting tired of the crap, but I'm not going to be petty. 2.3 is coming. The question I have floating in my head is.. Do I want to release 2.3, or Stage 1 (2.4) and Stage 2 (2.3) or do I want to deal with all the claims of "placebo" by releasing three subliminals labeled A, B and C, with one of them being 2.3 in ultrasonic, one being an ultrasonic subliminal audio of the words "Somewhere in the world, people are walking.", and one being the ultrasonic subliminalized trickling stream (no instruction set)? Haven't decided. But getting tired of the stupid and useless criticisms, when I have stated many times that this is experimental technology, in development, may not even be possible, and is being attempted as a secondary influence (you use the sub, someone else gets affected). Once again, I don't mind constructive criticisms, but the seemingly endless stupid and useless criticisms are why I have decided not to do public testing anymore after DMSI. Also, FYI, if the 2.x series does not please me, I would like you to know that I will build and release 3.0 with all the bells and whistles, and release it as a free upgrade. I may not be able to achieve the design goals otherwise. So you guys have nothing to worry about. I'm not about to scam you. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - maxx55 - 08-16-2016 (08-16-2016, 04:27 PM)Shannon Wrote:(08-16-2016, 01:19 PM)Sash Wrote:(08-15-2016, 08:32 PM)Shannon Wrote: I feel the energy. It's less obvious than v1, but noticeable. I also notice I'm burning energy much faster. And I'm noticing people acting differently around me with just a few minutes. Up to 30 feet away, I have seen what appears to have been responses to the aura, even from multiple women at the same time. A mother/daughter combo once, too. I can't tell if your being sarcastic or serious here. It's awesome that you believe that 3.0 will definitely accomplish the design goals. That's exciting! And it's great that you will thoroughly test the program to get it where you and your customers want it to be. However, if you do keep the testing exclusive to people who aren't apart of this forum, please use just as varied a sample size as what is currently on the forum. Like some users haven't had results yet like CatMan and Swisston, while others like Minititan have had at least 1 experience that is exactly what we're aiming for. As long as there's variety in the testers, the data should be accurate for an idea of final release results. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - JJ54 - 08-16-2016 (08-16-2016, 05:12 PM)Shannon Wrote: I'm certainly getting tired of the crap, but I'm not going to be petty. 2.3 is coming. Shannon, I would like to say that I enjoy being a tester for this new technology, let alone DMSI. I came into this with little expectations, and gotten more than I expected in return. No, it hasn't gotten me laid. But just learning how to read body language, know when a woman is turned on, and having confidence in my attractiveness is more than enough in my book. The attention I'm receiving now far outweighs what I was getting beforehand. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 08-16-2016 (08-16-2016, 05:20 PM)maxx55 Wrote:(08-16-2016, 04:27 PM)Shannon Wrote:(08-16-2016, 01:19 PM)Sash Wrote:(08-15-2016, 08:32 PM)Shannon Wrote: I feel the energy. It's less obvious than v1, but noticeable. I also notice I'm burning energy much faster. And I'm noticing people acting differently around me with just a few minutes. Up to 30 feet away, I have seen what appears to have been responses to the aura, even from multiple women at the same time. A mother/daughter combo once, too. See my post above that you missed. I do not believe 3.0 will definitely achieve the design goals. I believe it is most likely going to - but we may have to do 3.1, 2, etc. to work out kinks, and maybe even 4.x. But I am about 98% sure that in the end, we will succeed. Otherwise I would not be willing to put in all this time, and effort, and give away free upgrades all over the place in the process. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - fibonacciw - 08-16-2016 Just keep doing what you are doing.One of the reason why I brought the program because of the new tech you have been working on. So don't let a few frustrate you. I am and will be a life long customer of yours. If everyone truly understand the dynamics of what you are trying to accomplish. It could change the way one view self and the world. IMO.... RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - maxx55 - 08-16-2016 (08-16-2016, 05:22 PM)Shannon Wrote:(08-16-2016, 05:20 PM)maxx55 Wrote:(08-16-2016, 04:27 PM)Shannon Wrote:(08-16-2016, 01:19 PM)Sash Wrote:(08-15-2016, 08:32 PM)Shannon Wrote: I feel the energy. It's less obvious than v1, but noticeable. I also notice I'm burning energy much faster. And I'm noticing people acting differently around me with just a few minutes. Up to 30 feet away, I have seen what appears to have been responses to the aura, even from multiple women at the same time. A mother/daughter combo once, too. I was a bit slow posting from my smartphone. I would totally enjoy being a part of the DMSI testing myself, but I gotta finish E2. I think making the testing open like this was the best way to go about getting the necessary data for tweaking and refining the sub so it'll succeed. It just seems like maybe the next time (if you ever do it again), you should have a few pages with the words "BETA TESTING" covering them. It seems like a lot of people didn't take the necessary time to read that it's experimental before purchasing. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 08-16-2016 (08-16-2016, 05:24 PM)yeah! Wrote: The double blind (triple?) placebo control sounds awesome. Would the placebo give a reading on frequencee? For this test to be double blind, I will have to make the audio files and have someone else label them as A, B and C for me to not know any more than you do which ones are what until after the experiment is concluded. That's what I would do if I do run the testing like that. The placebo would for all intents and purposes be undetectable as such aside from actual effects produced by 2.3 that the other two do not produce. Otherwise there would be a way to defeat the double blind nature of the experiment. |