(11-10-2018, 09:15 PM)Mr. Anderson Wrote: Will LTU have something in it to improve/optimize health?

(11-11-2018, 03:40 AM)samba99 Wrote: Shannon,

A while ago you mentioned about using dreams with your sub.

How do you use dreams with you subliminal?

Especially MLS, in which I think I had a multi verse lucid dream.

Now I'm having interesting lucid dreams due to USLMv3.

(11-11-2018, 08:16 AM)Believe Wrote: Hello Shannon, sorry if it has been set before, but I have a question.
I have been doing DMSI 3.2, do I have to make a brake before DMSI 3.3?

Thank you in advance

(11-11-2018, 09:27 AM)pakr93 Wrote: Hey Shannon,

I am running E2 right now, but I already know that USLM 3 will be my next sub.

There are emotional issues I have to deal with first, which made me think: Would E2 be the best choice for emotional healing, or will USLM, with all the new tech, OE and FRM3.2, do a better job in this area? .

Thanks for the answer.

(11-11-2018, 10:16 AM)Believe Wrote: Approximately when do we expect DMSI 3.3?

(11-11-2018, 10:16 AM)Shannon Wrote:

(11-11-2018, 09:27 AM)pakr93 Wrote: Hey Shannon,

I am running E2 right now, but I already know that USLM 3 will be my next sub.

There are emotional issues I have to deal with first, which made me think: Would E2 be the best choice for emotional healing, or will USLM, with all the new tech, OE and FRM3.2, do a better job in this area? .

Thanks for the answer.

With the inclusion of the FRM, USLM now competes effectively with E2, even though E2 is specialized on the issue at hand, because the FRM will clear away the fears that result in a lot of the blockages to your success, and a lot of emotional issues are likely to fall into that category and be cleared at the same time.

Plus, E2 is ancient technology by comparison.

I recommend USLM3 if you have narrowed the choices down between E2 and USLM3. Otherwise, you might want to wait for LTU, which will have E3, USLM3, UMOP2, FRM 4+ and a host of other goodies, some of which don't even exist yet.

(11-11-2018, 12:02 PM)ianmarconi Wrote: Hey @Shannon , can i listen to less than 5 loops of USLM3? I think 5 is too much for me, today is the second day i listen to 5 loops and i am tired all day, with a brain fog and ungrounded (kind of airy).

(11-11-2018, 12:17 PM)Have at ye Wrote:

(11-11-2018, 12:02 PM)ianmarconi Wrote: Hey @Shannon , can i listen to less than 5 loops of USLM3? I think 5 is too much for me, today is the second day i listen to 5 loops and i am tired all day, with a brain fog and ungrounded (kind of airy).

I would advise to stick with 5 as per the instructions. The tiredness should start passing with further use as the program continues to work on removing fear and other things that don't jive with its goals. While you could technically listen to fewer loops, it will degrade effectiveness.

(11-11-2018, 12:02 PM)ianmarconi Wrote: Hey @Shannon , can i listen to less than 5 loops of USLM3? I think 5 is too much for me, today is the second day i listen to 5 loops and i am tired all day, with a brain fog and ungrounded (kind of airy).

(11-10-2018, 11:14 AM)Shannon Wrote:

(11-10-2018, 08:31 AM)TheGreatAttractor Wrote:

(11-09-2018, 08:03 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(11-09-2018, 07:37 PM)apollolux Wrote: @Shannon I don't know if I might be in the minority or not, but I'm cool with the possibility of DMSI 3.3 not being ready by November 20. WordPress 5.0 is slated for release Nov 16 or so and they still have hundreds of outstanding bugs they want to take care of before then, and that's a team of a few main devs and anywhere from a dozen to maybe a hundred decently skilled open-source contributors on top of that. You're one guy and I could understand if simply the amount of work alone, not to mention other possible real-world factors, might result in taking longer than the last week or two of this month.

I appreciate that.

Things are not done here the way other subliminal producers do them. Gone are the days when I could just write a script and optimize it by hand and then build it. In those days, I could build a program relatively quickly. Now it can sometimes take me days to craft a single sentence correctly, looking through literally hundreds of possible variants to get the highest possible levels of optimization.

I don't go to quite that degree very often, because it is rarely necessary, but it can easily take me 6 to 12 hours just to get one statement fully developed.

And a module may contain between 1 and more than 24 statements.

On top of that, consider that there are multiple sections of script (Pre-Script, Key Script, Core Script, Skeleton Script Body at the least) and that each one contains multiple modules, sometimes numbering more than a hundred.

Then consider that upgrading DMSI means I have to adjust, change, optimize, add to and/or replace some or all of each of those sections, with multiple modules each, usually having multiple statements each, without breaking inter-operability and inter-dependencies.

Finally, in DMSI, each statement can be pages of text long. So it's not exactly easy to work with them and maintain grammatic correctness. Even after all these years of doing this, I have to work on each statement in staggered sections that overlap to make sure the grammar is perfect.

And then you have the fact that I have a life, just like anyone else, and shit likes to happen to me.

So I had to build USLM3 and UMOP2 before working on DMSI 3.3 again, and that is done, and I spent the rest of today resting. I almost burned myself out trying to get all that done so fast.

Now I will resume working on DMSI 3.3, but I don't want to release it without having made enough improvements to it to be worth my time and yours. There is a lot left to do, so I'll be working hard, but setting deadlines when it's not absolutely necessary tends to result in dissapointment.

Of course I know there are some of you who think I'm silly for not using deadlines more often, but I know two things are true when it comes to deadlines.

First, they almost always result in less good quality than just working steadily until the job is done.

Second, I personally don't do well with deadlines.

So since you guys are waiting for something good, we might as well work on it right and do what it takes to get the best results we can get.

That said, I don't know when it will be finished; it might be on or about the 20th, still. Or it may be later. But for those of you who have a problem with it taking so long, I can only say that in my shoes you would be in the same position.

Doing it right is better than doing it fast. Complaints on this can be filed in the circular file. Working at my own pace, and in my own way, is how I achieve programs worth paying what we charge for them.

You guys are going to see what DMSI Final is like soon enough. It's not too terribly far off at this point. Especially with this cycle ending at the end of December. Maybe then, we can return to building it every couple of months.

I am definitely ready to be done with DMSI AND developing 6G!

@Shannon

Have you considered looking into some form of automation to help you reduce your workload? I think AutoIt might be a good place to start

AutoIt looks interesting, but runs on Windows. I have 98% of my subliminals building process running on Linux, because A) I can't find a suitable solution for that last 2% that maintains the quality, and B) Windows loves to suicide on me and kill my progress, software, time, success, progress, patience and soul.

I currently do everything the way I do it because the solution to automating things more than I have is to write the software to do that myself. Some of these things are trade secrets, and I'm not big on trusting NDAs.

To write the necessary software will require me to re-learn the programming language, since I haven't built anything in it since I built the last version of the models, and the language has changed significantly since then. Plus, I will have to teach myself a side programming methodology, and while I have to do both of those things to advance the models to their next version, now is not the time to stop being productive and focus on spending months writing software, which is what it would require between those two programs.

High automation is coming, but that will be a job to be tackled in 6G, when I don't have to worry about developing so much else at the same time.