(07-27-2016, 03:40 AM)Kurohawk Wrote: If by removing healing/OGSF aspect from DMSI makes the aura so strong it overshadows the need to heal, then it's safe to say we are all in.

- My experiance with ASC that i was your average beta male, but i had Courage that overshadowed all fear and i almost got toghether with the hottest girl i've ever seen -

(07-27-2016, 12:43 AM)Shannon Wrote: Basically, this is what happens when you have two goals in one program, and they're not pointing in the same direction. It was worth a shot, but I'm pretty sure that this is why the program is not doing the stuff everyone wants.

(07-27-2016, 04:32 AM)swisston Wrote:

(07-27-2016, 12:43 AM)Shannon Wrote: Basically, this is what happens when you have two goals in one program, and they're not pointing in the same direction. It was worth a shot, but I'm pretty sure that this is why the program is not doing the stuff everyone wants.

I would say that sounds more short term though. I want long term results, not an aura that will disappear a month after I switch subs. The aura is a bonus. The long term inner confidence and sexy feeling is what I want.

The goals aren't discordant, just maybe slightly at odds in the short term. Longer term, they should combine into a serious level of sexual attractiveness.

(07-27-2016, 04:32 AM)swisston Wrote:

(07-27-2016, 12:43 AM)Shannon Wrote: Basically, this is what happens when you have two goals in one program, and they're not pointing in the same direction. It was worth a shot, but I'm pretty sure that this is why the program is not doing the stuff everyone wants.

I would say that sounds more short term though. I want long term results, not an aura that will disappear a month after I switch subs. The aura is a bonus. The long term inner confidence and sexy feeling is what I want.

The goals aren't discordant, just maybe slightly at odds in the short term. Longer term, they should combine into a serious level of sexual attractiveness.

(07-27-2016, 07:11 AM)Dilettante Wrote: If dmsi is being affected by ogsf, it begs the question if it should be separate.

Shannon, i think, has addressed this further up by mentioning that he thinks the two programs should be separate

Now my question is one of practicality.

Shannon has stated that unless something major occurs, 2.2 is the final version. Subsequent versions (ie Version 3) is not covered under our initial purchase and v3 must be repurchased.

Is this still the case?
Will v3 be a second purchase to have a different version of dmsi (one that doesnt have an ogsf or whatever major change is made)?

(07-11-2016, 03:18 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(07-11-2016, 03:05 PM)alphabeta35 Wrote:

(07-11-2016, 02:33 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(07-11-2016, 02:32 PM)swisston Wrote:

(07-11-2016, 02:13 PM)Shannon Wrote: That is taken care of by the Optimus Engine, which basically says, "Hey, subconscious mind! Everything you know will make me sexier? Let's do that."

Does that require an initial understanding of what makes us sexy though? If I've never felt sexy or desirable before, does my subconscious actually know what to do? Can I educate myself somehow?

It already knows or has access to everything you need to know. Believe it.

hi Shannon,
i tried to search for SM 3.0 in the thread but the system found it too short!! of a term to search for.
i wanted to learn how this new DMSI relates to SM 3.0. i am in the fifth stage of AM 6 and starting the last stage 5 days later (the change is unbelievable, btw.).
i was thinking of purchasing the SM 3.0 set for afterwards, however this new program caught my attention, mostkly because of the new methods you are using in it. i was prepared to purchase the sm 3.0 so, without regards to the price, what should be the next step? is it possible to use DMSI 2.2 along with SM 3.0, maybe one or two loops a day (which the answer will probably be no, but i did not come across with a discussion of this in the 30+ pages i browsed)?
i hope i have not asked a question that was asked before, but did not find anything related in the last 30 or so pages i went back.

You absolutely cannot use them together. They definitely and very strongly conflict, and they will severely damage each other's programming.

Remember that SM3 is designed specifically to extend the effects of AM6 into a primal, sexual alpha. DMSI is designed to take a person and get them laid.

They both have the goal of getting you laid, and they both use auras, but they have very different ways of getting you there.

SM3 will grow you and make you a better man. DMSI will heal you to the extent that you need healing to express and act out it's program. Otherwise, no growth.

One is trying to make a huge change in you as a being; one is only trying to get you to project sexualized energy and then act on any sexual results.

Which one you pick is up to you.

(07-27-2016, 12:45 PM)alphabeta35 Wrote:

(07-11-2016, 03:18 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(07-11-2016, 03:05 PM)alphabeta35 Wrote:

(07-11-2016, 02:33 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(07-11-2016, 02:32 PM)swisston Wrote: Does that require an initial understanding of what makes us sexy though? If I've never felt sexy or desirable before, does my subconscious actually know what to do? Can I educate myself somehow?

It already knows or has access to everything you need to know. Believe it.

hi Shannon,
i tried to search for SM 3.0 in the thread but the system found it too short!! of a term to search for.
i wanted to learn how this new DMSI relates to SM 3.0. i am in the fifth stage of AM 6 and starting the last stage 5 days later (the change is unbelievable, btw.).
i was thinking of purchasing the SM 3.0 set for afterwards, however this new program caught my attention, mostkly because of the new methods you are using in it. i was prepared to purchase the sm 3.0 so, without regards to the price, what should be the next step? is it possible to use DMSI 2.2 along with SM 3.0, maybe one or two loops a day (which the answer will probably be no, but i did not come across with a discussion of this in the 30+ pages i browsed)?
i hope i have not asked a question that was asked before, but did not find anything related in the last 30 or so pages i went back.

You absolutely cannot use them together. They definitely and very strongly conflict, and they will severely damage each other's programming.

Remember that SM3 is designed specifically to extend the effects of AM6 into a primal, sexual alpha. DMSI is designed to take a person and get them laid.

They both have the goal of getting you laid, and they both use auras, but they have very different ways of getting you there.

SM3 will grow you and make you a better man. DMSI will heal you to the extent that you need healing to express and act out it's program. Otherwise, no growth.

One is trying to make a huge change in you as a being; one is only trying to get you to project sexualized energy and then act on any sexual results.

Which one you pick is up to you.

hi Shannon,
somewhere in this thread, you mentioned FLAC files in the newest programs are slightly more effective than compressed mp3s.
assuming you have the uncompressed masters, is it possible for you to encode the SM 3.0 program in FLAC format as well?
i am at the last stage of AM 6 and about to start that one soon. probably like most of us who are here and taking it seriously, i have the necessary audio setup, all wired hi-res player/headphones/speakers (for ultrasonics) that all support up to at least 35khz range.

please consider this request as i am really hoping it is a justifiable effort on your side. it would probably benefit everyone who have started with AM 6.0 and will be getting on SM 3.0 as their only program for another 6 stages, even a 5% more efficiency translates to around 200 hours of listening .

(07-27-2016, 12:20 AM)Shannon Wrote: Slow and steady winsthe race.

(07-27-2016, 07:48 PM)apollolux Wrote:

(07-27-2016, 12:20 AM)Shannon Wrote: Slow and steady winsthe race.

No it didn't, and people commonly get this wrong. The actual moral of the fable of The Tortoise and The Hare is that the tortoise won because the hare was lazy and fell asleep before finishing the race and the tortoise kept going no matter what even though he knew the hare beat him easily on raw speed.

(07-28-2016, 11:38 AM)Shannon Wrote: The moral of the story is that steady application to a goal - regardless of how fast it is done - will accomplish the goal, while being inconsistent in your efforts toward a goal - regardless of how quickly you could potentially achieve it - will usually not achieve the goal.

(07-28-2016, 11:38 AM)Shannon Wrote: The saying "slow and steady winsthe the race" is not actually referring to the speed at which you achieve a goal, or a literal race. In this case, it refers to successfully accomplishing your goal.

Speed means nothing if you do not achieve the goal. Consistency achieves the goal better than speed, and that's the point, simplified by the fables author so much that modern humans don't understand it anymore.