![]() |
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-11-2015 (11-11-2015, 04:30 PM)Mr. Anderson Wrote: @Shannon: Are there any plans to upgrade also OGSF to 5G? If so, is there a chance to add something more specific related to GSF regarding women/sex? Or maybe building another OGSF version related to women and sex? It looks like many people have issues here (me included), and I saw an OF testimonial where a guy got good results besides the area around sex/women. It could cover the topic(s) in general as well as even more specific stuff like GSF regarding looking at women, seeing women in a sexual way, touching women, having sex with them, becoming aroused due to women, feeling the arousal, etc. I think you get the picture. I plan on upgrading everything to the best possible version of itself. The question is, when will I get the chance? ![]() As for upgrading that title, it seems like a good idea. But why does it need to focus on one area when we don't know how that one area is interconnected with everything else within a person's psychological makeup and it changes with every person? Sometimes, a specific area of focus is going to need more work, but in my experience, more often than not you have what I refer to as "spiderweb theory" at work. I don't think I have explained "spiderweb theory" before, so here goes. In all spiderwebs, you have at least three anchor points, and more often than not, five or even more. This is is similar to what I have discovered to be true with psychological issues. There are multiple "anchor points" and they are all interconnected and intersupportive. Cut any one of the strands that forms an anchor point, and the web still exists; sooner or later, the "spider" (subconscious) will regenerate that anchor point when effort aimed at severing it stops, partly because those other anchor points still exist and still indirectly support that reality. Therefore, the effective approach must be to sever ALL anchor points simultaneously. When this happens, the entire web collapses. Once the whole web collapses, it can be replaced with a different web using different anchor points, and those can be positive. This is a big part of why certain issues are so challenging to deal with, like weight loss, stop smoking, alpha male, sex magnet, etc. Basically I have to somehow know what each and every one of those anchor points (supporting and involved issues) is, how to "sever" it, and how to get you to cooperate in actually doing so, and then do so all at once and recreate the "web" in a new way. That's no easy task, let me tell you. This is precisely why 6G is being worked on, and precisely why it is so complex and taking so long to create. The target goal for the prototype is so challenging and complex that when I started working on it, I did not believe it was actually possible to achieve. I only started working on it because a special adviser of mine told me that I was capable of achieving it and that would only become a reality if I was willing to pursue the goal until it became a reality, regardless of any and all doubts or opposition I might face. Since I trust this particular man with my life, and I know he knows what he's talking about and has never let me down or led me stray when it mattered, I trusted that he was right, and began working. 14+ months later I am still working, but now I can clearly see that he was absolutely right. This goal was chosen because basically if I can achieve it, I should be able, with enough understanding and tuning, to achieve virtually anything else. And, because it has the most "anchor points" of any target goal I could think of, and therefore is most useful in unraveling how to achieve virtually any other goal. Anyway, back to my original point, it is better to approach all possible anchor points than to focus on one because the rest may regenerate that one area of issue if they are not also transformed. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-11-2015 (11-11-2015, 05:03 PM)FrostedFake Wrote:(11-11-2015, 03:37 PM)Superman Wrote: they're not a magic pill to make your life better. It takes action to create real change. At some level and in some way, you always have to take action, because let's face it: accepting and then executing the script is a pair of actions. So you always need action in some way and at some level, but you don't always need physical or external action. However, the goal in a lot of cases is not going to be reached if you hide in your bedroom playing video games. So when you want to achieve a goal you wish to achieve that cannot be achieved merely by cooperating and executing the script internally, you must allow yourself to and then actually take the necessary physical action. In cases where this does not happen, it is usually a resistance to instructions in the script, because the script will always direct you to take whatever actions are necessary to achieve the desired goal(s). RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-11-2015 I can't answer questions I don't see, gentlemen. So if you want them answered, ask them. But if Ryan is choosing to behave in a manner unbecoming of a welcomed guest to these forums, we are not going to allow it to disrupt the forums any more than we would allow anyone else to do so. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - heavysm - 11-11-2015 (11-11-2015, 05:25 PM)Shannon Wrote: You keep reminding me, and we'll see what we can do. There's such a blizzard of stuff going on that it's hard to maintain a straight path without constant reminders. Shall i do periodic reminders for All-in-one Writers 5G? (i believe this is just a matter of combining the old 3G subs?) I don't mind late 2016 or whatever launch, but I'd like for it to be within a few years, if possible. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - FluffyBunny - 11-11-2015 (11-11-2015, 05:38 PM)Shannon Wrote:(11-11-2015, 04:30 PM)Mr. Anderson Wrote: @Shannon: Are there any plans to upgrade also OGSF to 5G? If so, is there a chance to add something more specific related to GSF regarding women/sex? Or maybe building another OGSF version related to women and sex? It looks like many people have issues here (me included), and I saw an OF testimonial where a guy got good results besides the area around sex/women. It could cover the topic(s) in general as well as even more specific stuff like GSF regarding looking at women, seeing women in a sexual way, touching women, having sex with them, becoming aroused due to women, feeling the arousal, etc. I think you get the picture. Hey Shannon i got few questions on the anchor points For anchors points such as alpha male. 1. Should we identify ourselves what our anchor points are and consciously take them out? (As in being vigilant about our behaviour when ever we do something beta and correct it ) 2. How do we know what our own anchor points are? is it base off of fear? for example if i am afraid of doing something, is that an indication of having an anchor point there? 3. Since i just finish running am6 few days ago. And i can see my behaviour shift does that mean some things are regenerating ? How do i identify which are the good behaviours that are balancing out (aka being between the spectrum Alpha male and who i am in the core) and which ones are the bad behaviour (beta male) that are resurfacing ? For example : lets say now i am joking around more with girls, and being less "one directional alpha person" . Technically speaking its hard to say is it really more alpha or less alpha behaviour cause it stems from the intent.... So how do we truly identify ourselves? Thanks RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-11-2015 Quote:Could you add WM to your list to upgrade? I know a lot of guys who said they wish that WM was as powerful as SM. A lot of those guys ended up running SM instead. Would it be a good idea to ugrade WM soon or just wait till its 6g version can be made (if six stagers are possible in 6g). All three are in queue for eventual upgrade. It's just a matter of when is the time right. Quote:Btw do you think that running OF 5g for 6 months would help with resistance (generally, I know you don't know me personally) and help AM6 be accepted better, or do you think that if I just ran AM6 a ridiculous amount of times it would keep attacking the issue without letting it regrow its anchor points? I notice I'm doing stuff that AM6 is directing me to do but my old negative emotions come up while doing them. Like my speech patterns are more harsh but then I feel bad while I'm talking to somebody, like I'm being rude to them. That depends on how much fear you have. If it's interfering with achieving the goals of the program significantly when you have finished running AM6, then OF 5G would be a good long term investment. Quote:Or to kind of shorten my question for clarity: Generally it is going to depend on what the anchor point issues are, and how much they are strengthened and regenerated by fear. If the fear is sufficient to empower them against AM and the results are not satisfactory compared to what you see others getting per run, OF is probably a good choice. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Dubls - 11-11-2015 (11-11-2015, 06:18 PM)FrostedFake Wrote: Could you add WM to your list to upgrade? I know a lot of guys who said they wish that WM was as powerful as SM. A lot of those guys ended up running SM instead. Would it be a good idea to ugrade WM soon or just wait till its 6g version can be made (if six stagers are possible in 6g). Shannon will you give you his answer, but this applies to my situation right now. In two months, I'll complete my second consecutive run of AM6. I planned to do a third consecutive run, but I've decided against it because devoting 4 of my waking hours each day to this program for almost a year has limited my social life. What's more relevant to you is the following: I believe there is merit to using single stage programs to enhance or pave the way for multi stage programs. Sounds like you're thinking of preceding your first run of AM6 with OF. I plan on putting at least 6 months of ASC between my 2nd and third runs of AM6, not just for the break, but because AM6 helped me to identify that the root of all my major hangups is confidence. So don't underestimate the ability of a program like AM6 to reveal issues that need specific attention. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-11-2015 (11-11-2015, 06:12 PM)heavysm Wrote:(11-11-2015, 05:25 PM)Shannon Wrote: You keep reminding me, and we'll see what we can do. There's such a blizzard of stuff going on that it's hard to maintain a straight path without constant reminders. Fire away. The more it's in front of my eyes, the more likely it is to get my attention and action. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-11-2015 (11-11-2015, 06:15 PM)FluffyBunny Wrote: [snip] If you can, conscious effort to do that is very helpful in enhancing and supporting the subconscious effort usually. But not every anchoring point is going to be something you are consciously aware of. Quote:2. How do we know what our own anchor points are? is it base off of fear? for example if i am afraid of doing something, is that an indication of having an anchor point there? It is not easy to know what all the anchor points are consciously. Almost invariably they will be based in fear, according to my research. So just trace back the fear as far as you can and that should help. But without an advanced understanding of the subconscious, it's hard to do that in a lot of cases. Anchor points are intersupportive issues that help form the whole of "what is". So for example, with weight as an issue, insecurity (fear) is often an anchor point, low self esteem (fear of not being good enough), poor self body image (fear of not being attractive enough), anxiety (fear of something in particular that us subconsciously triggered but may or may not be consciously understood), control issues (fear of being vulnerable if one is not in control), and of course there can be a variety of triggers that are associations which are programmed, such as the association with eating to being loved, cared about, safe, taken care of, valued, etc. or being overweight to being safe, protected, unattractive enough to prevent XYZ from happening, big enough to prevent XYZ from happening, etc. Some of these make no logical sense, but the subconscious mind understands them perfectly. For this reason, it may be that the real anchor point is too deeply buried subconsciously to understand without effort, or it is too illogical for the logical mind to easily trace without advanced understanding of the subconscious and oneself in specific. Quote:3. Since i just finish running am6 few days ago. And i can see my behaviour shift does that mean some things are regenerating ? How do i identify which are the good behaviours that are balancing out (aka being between the spectrum Alpha male and who i am in the core) and which ones are the bad behaviour (beta male) that are resurfacing ? When you finish a program, you're going to see two things happen generally while you rest. First, any remaining anchor points will attempt to regenerate and reassert themselves, and second, the programming that has been installed will attempt to manifest as the subconscious no longer has to focus on input comprehension, processing and storage. How they balance out will depend on how long you rest, and how strong each one is. If you see, after a week or two, anchor points from pre-run reasserting themselves, then you either need to remove that particular anchor point (if it's only one left), and/or re-run the whole program. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-11-2015 So every time I think I have Paradise right, I eventually find something that's not right with it while I am testing it. We're up to formula version #202 now. But that said, I have the ideas for how to adjust it. Unfortunately, lately I have not had the time to work on it, since I am working on four subs right now. It's funny because my friends in the food service industry are upset, since I have been working so much lately that I don't see them very often anymore, and when I do have to go out to eat (because going home to eat when I am that low on blood sugar would be too tempting for me to stop working and start doing something useless) they are disappointed because I don't have new fragrance samples for them to explore. C'est la vie. I have the two final ingredients for Paradise now, but again... must wait. Not like it was any major draw since nobody but me has smelled it. I'm having a good time being productive with subs, though. Kind of feels like I have somehow escaped some sort of lead blanket and now I can be active again. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Benjamin - 11-11-2015 Shannon is OF 5g going to just be the same script but in 5g or have you come up with other things to add or modify for it? I don't really want to delay WM or SM more but I know that fear is a BIG thing holding me back from full expression, even during AM6. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-11-2015 (11-11-2015, 09:44 PM)FrostedFake Wrote: I'm wondering if or when this company is going to become mainstream. With 6g? 7g? A program that produces groundbreaking results that are obvious for even the harshest skeptics? SM4...I can see the headlines now. We will probably get noticed by the media sometime in 2016 or 2017, according to the predictive models. ![]() We are already starting to gear up for that, but progress isn't as fast as I wish it were just yet. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-11-2015 (11-11-2015, 08:07 PM)Benjamin Wrote: Shannon is OF 5g going to just be the same script but in 5g or have you come up with other things to add or modify for it? OF is going to get a strip down and rebuild from the ground up, with additions. That's what I'm working on now, actually. Every time I rebuild or upgrade something, I try to make it as capable as I know how to within it's designated generation of build format. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Breeze - 11-11-2015 Hey, Shannon, I was wondering if you could present us more options with masked tracks in the future subs? Like, Rainfall w/ thunder, or crackling fire. That would be awesome. |