![]() |
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Daredevil - 07-12-2016 (07-12-2016, 05:11 PM)Shannon Wrote: Hercules, the 3rd edition is out of date. The current edition is the 4th edition. Looked on Google and can't find the book. Can you post a link please. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-12-2016 (07-12-2016, 06:30 PM)Hercules Wrote:(07-12-2016, 05:11 PM)Shannon Wrote: Hercules, the 3rd edition is out of date. The current edition is the 4th edition. Sorry, man, this forum isn't for advertising my book. You can find it if you look hard enough. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Steven - 07-12-2016 Shannon, I wanted to pass something on about the current version of DMSI. When I was listening to it, I took notes. As I was recycling them today, I remembered something that I thought I should post. Many women appeared unbalanced around me, yet some what happy, engaged, intrigued. It's like they could not quite place me in a category and they were trying to do so. Is there something in the newer version that could either capitalize on that or counteract that to help fulfill the goals of the program? Second, men would occasionally appear to be very awkward around me. Perhaps even intimidated or fearful. I've never seen that before. Is there something in the new version that might counter act that? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Daredevil - 07-12-2016 (07-12-2016, 06:42 PM)Shannon Wrote:(07-12-2016, 06:30 PM)Hercules Wrote:(07-12-2016, 05:11 PM)Shannon Wrote: Hercules, the 3rd edition is out of date. The current edition is the 4th edition. Bruh, your funny Shannon but whatever, I will look. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-12-2016 (07-12-2016, 06:43 PM)Steven Wrote: Shannon, This is likely the result of in-congruence between your energy and actions, which would be taken care of naturally by the program with enough exposure time for v2.1 or 2.2. Quote:Second, men would occasionally appear to be very awkward around me. Perhaps even intimidated or fearful. I've never seen that before. Is there something in the new version that might counter act that? You're going to have to deal with the effects of having the sexual aura of a sexy beast, my friend. That's part of the price - guys can sense it and they know that you're a force to be dealt with. Trust me, you don't want me to take that effect out. Awkward guys either don't know how to handle your energy or are attracted, but don't know what to do about it. Intimidated guys are in awe of your sexually dominant aura. Fearful guys are blown away by it, and they feel totally outclassed. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Bookstacks DC737 - 07-12-2016 To add to what I said about Testosterone earlier, Testosterone and Cortisol (the stress hormone) have an inverse relationship. The more testosterone you have, the lower your cortisol. Boosting my testosterone has done wonders for allowing me to remain relaxed and sleep much deeper. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - heavysm - 07-12-2016 I'll just repost this since i think it's important... (07-11-2016, 09:26 PM)FrostedFake Wrote: Shannon, do you think it'd be more effective to rotate AM6 and E2 (6 months)? Or do you think it would be more effective to run E2 for a long time like a year and then just run AM6 after that for awhile? Good question for the BASE users as well. If it is best to do 6 months BASE 1 month E 2, and do that over and over then I'd definitely be up for that. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Steven - 07-12-2016 Shannon, Thank you for explaining that. Everything you said in your reply to me makes PERFECT sense! Thank you! RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-12-2016 RTBoss and Hercules, we are not supposed to be linking to or advertising my books in the main forum. Please move your post to the chatterbox. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Benjamin - 07-12-2016 Quote:Second, men would occasionally appear to be very awkward around me. Perhaps even intimidated or fearful. I've never seen that before. Is there something in the new version that might counter act that? I don't see that as an issue. I think it's a good sign actually, similar to AM6 and actually i'm getting this a little on E2 which is weird.. for me it mainly seems to be the guys who are insecure or troublemakers that I get this from.. especially on the past AM programs I got it alot more. I'd rather troublemakers hate me and good people like me more. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Steven - 07-12-2016 @Benjamin Good points! RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Steven - 07-13-2016 Shannon, Would you please discuss the differences between DMSI 2.1 and DMSI 2.2? What are the similarities and differences? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - RTBoss - 07-13-2016 Shannon, just to clarify for all future testing, will you explain why releasing a program for immediate use by people currently running a completely unrelated program (ie DMSI V2.2 after AM6) without a 7 day break isn't going to cause a problem when it comes to reporting? Is it because the new program is so powerful it will completely override the other program's programming, the new sub will cause effects easily distinguishable from the other program, both, and/or? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - 4Kingdoms - 07-13-2016 (07-13-2016, 05:02 AM)RTBoss Wrote: Shannon, just to clarify for all future testing, will you explain why releasing a program for immediate use by people currently running a completely unrelated program (ie DMSI V2.2 after AM6) without a 7 day break isn't going to cause a problem when it comes to reporting? RT, no matter how many times Shannon writes it or says it... people will experiment with fire. http://www.subliminal-shop.com/5g-instructions/ Don’t use anything else while you’re using a 5G program. 5G maxes out your brain’s audio input channel for subliminal audio. Anything beyond 5G by itself is going to seriously degrade your results because the overload will make your brain unable to decipher everything being said. http://subliminal-talk.com/thread-7693-post-120567.html#pid120567 (07-11-2016, 12:02 AM)Tobi Wrote: if we ran 2.2 dmsi without the seven day gap would that cause a lot of problems? (07-11-2016, 12:05 AM)Shannon Wrote: There will be a period of time during which 2.1 is directly contradicting 2.2 and neither will work well or fully. Some things are the same between them, but not everything. You're going to do better to wait. |