Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Volume-3) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 10-17-2018 (10-17-2018, 03:04 PM)Shadow2200 Wrote:(10-17-2018, 06:03 AM)Shannon Wrote:(10-16-2018, 10:50 PM)Gotcha Wrote: Hey guys! I have pages of things that I have been gathering since releasing 3.2. If you guys have requested it, it might be in there. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Chris P. Bacon - 10-17-2018 (10-17-2018, 04:03 PM)X88B88 Wrote:(10-17-2018, 03:54 PM)Benjamin Wrote: FLAC in general is a little higher effectiveness, not sure why that would change with bluetooth speakers. As of the last time I checked , you may want to check again, but bluetooth transfers auido at 320kbps which is the quality of a cd. FLAC requires much more than that. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 10-17-2018 (10-17-2018, 04:03 PM)X88B88 Wrote:(10-17-2018, 03:54 PM)Benjamin Wrote: FLAC in general is a little higher effectiveness, not sure why that would change with bluetooth speakers. I don't know enough to be able to say if the bluetooth hardware will degrade the quality or not. I would imagine not, though. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 10-17-2018 (10-17-2018, 05:08 PM)Broski Wrote: Shannon cam the FRM really eliminate ALL fear from ones existence? I know its just based on my own limiting beliefs, but operating in the world with ZERO fear whatsoever just sounds too good to be true. If it truly allows one to do that it will be an incredible break through. I almost feel like with the complete removal of fear no other sub or anything else is really needed as fear is the number 1 thing stopping people from getting what they want in life, regardless of what it may be. Really excited to see who is the first to fully execute the FRM and what their experience is like. First, remember that the FRM is a module. It is designed to remove whatever fear stands in your way of executing the subliminal and achieving its goal(s). Not every fear you have. Now, if we were to make the goal of the program fear removal, it might go after all fears. Right now we have v2 to work with, and I am working on v3. I will keep revising it until it does what I want it to do or I can't make it any better. Is it going to result in people having zero fear? I don't know. I do know that when I finish making it do what I want, it is very likely to be a major game changer. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Chris P. Bacon - 10-17-2018 3 years old so Im not sure if it has gotten better. https://www.reddit.com/r/CarAV/comments/38r22j/what_kbps_does_bluetooth_stream_at/ That said, it will still play the track, i will just be compressed due to the limitations of bluetooth streaming. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Benjamin - 10-17-2018 (10-17-2018, 04:03 PM)X88B88 Wrote:(10-17-2018, 03:54 PM)Benjamin Wrote: FLAC in general is a little higher effectiveness, not sure why that would change with bluetooth speakers. Well, i'm not sure, I don't know enough about that either unfortunately. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shawn - 10-17-2018 (10-17-2018, 06:54 PM)Benjamin Wrote:(10-17-2018, 04:03 PM)X88B88 Wrote:(10-17-2018, 03:54 PM)Benjamin Wrote: FLAC in general is a little higher effectiveness, not sure why that would change with bluetooth speakers. Not every company implemented support for lossless audio transfer. The only way to know it if not exactly mentioned in the product description is to ask the company about maximum bitrate and the way the audio is transferred. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 10-17-2018 If it's not lossless, it's useless. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - terry44 - 10-17-2018 I thought bluetooth was always lossy. http://www.sereneaudio.com/blog/how-good-is-bluetooth-audio-at-its-best RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - san_hal - 10-17-2018 I am not sure.but there should be some minimum standards for every bluetooth speakers. lossless will be in the standard RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - hsindermann - 10-17-2018 (10-17-2018, 09:44 PM)terry44 Wrote: I thought bluetooth was always lossy. I remember reading there is also a lossfree standard, but as of the last time I've read about it (couple of years ago actually, so the situation today might be completely different) the lossless standard was used by only one or two companies. All others were using lossy ones, which means losing audio information. And as all these compression standards are based on psychoacoustic models, they get rid first of the information that we don't (consciously) hear, so exactly where the good stuff is in subliminal land. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - lano1106 - 10-17-2018 (10-17-2018, 06:47 PM)Wharrgarbl Wrote:(10-17-2018, 04:03 PM)X88B88 Wrote:(10-17-2018, 03:54 PM)Benjamin Wrote: FLAC in general is a little higher effectiveness, not sure why that would change with bluetooth speakers. Check this: https://www.lifewire.com/what-to-know-about-bluetooth-3134591 So bottomline. The phone decompress the FLAC audio and it is recompressed to fit into the available bluetooth bandwidth. IOW, if you want the best possible audio, you should stay away from bluetooth headsets (unless your headset support FLAC decoding)... RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - san_hal - 10-17-2018 Yes, i read few article, bluetooth is lossy. i will stop listening to sub from my bluetooth sleepphones. I verified it using app spectral analyser. Dumb thing, i listened to it for 2 day..will add 1.5 +1.5 DAYS. https://www.reddit.com/r/audiophile/comments/40ndlj/does_anyone_stream_flac_through_bluetooth/ RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shawn - 10-17-2018 The latest one or two versions SUPPORT lossless transfer, but that doesn't mean the manufacturers have implemented that feature. I remember reading an test - but this was already two years ago or so - where all tested devices supported the latest standard which supported lossless transfer, but none of the tested devices had this feature implemented even if they supported the latest standard. |