Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Volume-3)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 10-17-2018

(10-17-2018, 03:04 PM)Shadow2200 Wrote:
(10-17-2018, 06:03 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(10-16-2018, 10:50 PM)Gotcha Wrote: Hey guys!

What’s the news on DMSI 3.3?

I am currently working on developing FRM v3 for it. I'm going to try to make DMSI 3.3 as successful as possible by doing so.

(10-17-2018, 08:23 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(10-17-2018, 06:38 AM)josh84 Wrote: Hi Shannon, just wondering about mhs, when you release it in 6g do you think it would be strong enough to repair damaged hearing to the point people may not need hearing aids.

I can't know that yet.

Quote:Ive been off dmsi for 2 months now, and i understand many things have come up in that time, if i was to use some hypnosis products while waiting for 3.3 to be released how much of a break do i need before moving onto 3.3 once its released, and do we have more than 35 days still away while frm is being tested to improve on before 3.3?

Thanks.

The instructions are posted in the FAQ for that.

I don't know how long we have until I release 3.3. I only know that I am focused on FRM3 right now, and I have a lot I want to add after that.

What other thing you consider putting in 3.3 besides the frm3. Also is frm3 significantly stronger than frm2?

I have pages of things that I have been gathering since releasing 3.2. If you guys have requested it, it might be in there.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Chris P. Bacon - 10-17-2018

(10-17-2018, 04:03 PM)X88B88 Wrote:
(10-17-2018, 03:54 PM)Benjamin Wrote: FLAC in general is a little higher effectiveness, not sure why that would change with bluetooth speakers.

I don't know if bluetooth speakers lose any quality or frequency, but others have reported they use them and it's been fine. You can also try the speaker test on them.

I've tried the speaker test and no problem.. I was more enquiring as to whether anyone knew whether the subliminal element would be affected through Bluetooth.. don't really know enough about the exact technical details as to bit transfer / loss etc.

As of the last time I checked , you may want to check again, but bluetooth transfers auido at 320kbps which is the quality of a cd. FLAC requires much more than that.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 10-17-2018

(10-17-2018, 04:03 PM)X88B88 Wrote:
(10-17-2018, 03:54 PM)Benjamin Wrote: FLAC in general is a little higher effectiveness, not sure why that would change with bluetooth speakers.

I don't know if bluetooth speakers lose any quality or frequency, but others have reported they use them and it's been fine. You can also try the speaker test on them.

I've tried the speaker test and no problem.. I was more enquiring as to whether anyone knew whether the subliminal element would be affected through Bluetooth.. don't really know enough about the exact technical details as to bit transfer / loss etc.

I don't know enough to be able to say if the bluetooth hardware will degrade the quality or not. I would imagine not, though.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 10-17-2018

(10-17-2018, 05:08 PM)Broski Wrote: Shannon cam the FRM really eliminate ALL fear from ones existence? I know its just based on my own limiting beliefs, but operating in the world with ZERO fear whatsoever just sounds too good to be true. If it truly allows one to do that it will be an incredible break through. I almost feel like with the complete removal of fear no other sub or anything else is really needed as fear is the number 1 thing stopping people from getting what they want in life, regardless of what it may be. Really excited to see who is the first to fully execute the FRM and what their experience is like.

First, remember that the FRM is a module. It is designed to remove whatever fear stands in your way of executing the subliminal and achieving its goal(s). Not every fear you have.

Now, if we were to make the goal of the program fear removal, it might go after all fears.

Right now we have v2 to work with, and I am working on v3. I will keep revising it until it does what I want it to do or I can't make it any better.

Is it going to result in people having zero fear? I don't know. I do know that when I finish making it do what I want, it is very likely to be a major game changer.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Chris P. Bacon - 10-17-2018

3 years old so Im not sure if it has gotten better.

https://www.reddit.com/r/CarAV/comments/38r22j/what_kbps_does_bluetooth_stream_at/

That said, it will still play the track, i will just be compressed due to the limitations of bluetooth streaming.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Benjamin - 10-17-2018

(10-17-2018, 04:03 PM)X88B88 Wrote:
(10-17-2018, 03:54 PM)Benjamin Wrote: FLAC in general is a little higher effectiveness, not sure why that would change with bluetooth speakers.

I don't know if bluetooth speakers lose any quality or frequency, but others have reported they use them and it's been fine. You can also try the speaker test on them.

I've tried the speaker test and no problem.. I was more enquiring as to whether anyone knew whether the subliminal element would be affected through Bluetooth.. don't really know enough about the exact technical details as to bit transfer / loss etc.

Well, i'm not sure, I don't know enough about that either unfortunately.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shawn - 10-17-2018

(10-17-2018, 06:54 PM)Benjamin Wrote:
(10-17-2018, 04:03 PM)X88B88 Wrote:
(10-17-2018, 03:54 PM)Benjamin Wrote: FLAC in general is a little higher effectiveness, not sure why that would change with bluetooth speakers.

I don't know if bluetooth speakers lose any quality or frequency, but others have reported they use them and it's been fine. You can also try the speaker test on them.

I've tried the speaker test and no problem.. I was more enquiring as to whether anyone knew whether the subliminal element would be affected through Bluetooth.. don't really know enough about the exact technical details as to bit transfer / loss etc.

Well, i'm not sure, I don't know enough about that either unfortunately.

Not every company implemented support for lossless audio transfer. The only way to know it if not exactly mentioned in the product description is to ask the company about maximum bitrate and the way the audio is transferred.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 10-17-2018

If it's not lossless, it's useless.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - terry44 - 10-17-2018

I thought bluetooth was always lossy.

http://www.sereneaudio.com/blog/how-good-is-bluetooth-audio-at-its-best


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - san_hal - 10-17-2018

I am not sure.but there should be some minimum standards for every bluetooth speakers. lossless will be in the standard


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - hsindermann - 10-17-2018

(10-17-2018, 09:44 PM)terry44 Wrote: I thought bluetooth was always lossy.

http://www.sereneaudio.com/blog/how-good-is-bluetooth-audio-at-its-best

I remember reading there is also a lossfree standard, but as of the last time I've read about it (couple of years ago actually, so the situation today might be completely different) the lossless standard was used by only one or two companies. All others were using lossy ones, which means losing audio information. And as all these compression standards are based on psychoacoustic models, they get rid first of the information that we don't (consciously) hear, so exactly where the good stuff is in subliminal land.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - lano1106 - 10-17-2018

(10-17-2018, 06:47 PM)Wharrgarbl Wrote:
(10-17-2018, 04:03 PM)X88B88 Wrote:
(10-17-2018, 03:54 PM)Benjamin Wrote: FLAC in general is a little higher effectiveness, not sure why that would change with bluetooth speakers.

I don't know if bluetooth speakers lose any quality or frequency, but others have reported they use them and it's been fine. You can also try the speaker test on them.

I've tried the speaker test and no problem.. I was more enquiring as to whether anyone knew whether the subliminal element would be affected through Bluetooth.. don't really know enough about the exact technical details as to bit transfer / loss etc.

As of the last time I checked , you may want to check again, but bluetooth transfers auido at 320kbps which is the quality of a cd. FLAC requires much more than that.

Check this:
https://www.lifewire.com/what-to-know-about-bluetooth-3134591

So bottomline. The phone decompress the FLAC audio and it is recompressed to fit into the available bluetooth bandwidth.

IOW, if you want the best possible audio, you should stay away from bluetooth headsets (unless your headset support FLAC decoding)...


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - san_hal - 10-17-2018

Yes, i read few article, bluetooth is lossy. i will stop listening to sub from my bluetooth sleepphones.

I verified it using app spectral analyser.

Dumb thing, i listened to it for 2 day..will add 1.5 +1.5 DAYS.


https://www.reddit.com/r/audiophile/comments/40ndlj/does_anyone_stream_flac_through_bluetooth/

Mad


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shawn - 10-17-2018

The latest one or two versions SUPPORT lossless transfer, but that doesn't mean the manufacturers have implemented that feature. I remember reading an test - but this was already two years ago or so - where all tested devices supported the latest standard which supported lossless transfer, but none of the tested devices had this feature implemented even if they supported the latest standard.