(05-27-2024, 08:06 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(05-27-2024, 04:11 PM)geotrouvetout Wrote: Hi @Shannon and @Benjamin I suscribed to Optimal physical healing. There is a problem with the file, it stops every 10 seconds for few seconds. I check if the problem is on my side,but it does not seem. Thanks !

I don't see any issues on our end.  Ben, do you see anything?

Which file(s) have you tried?  What checks have you done?

(05-29-2024, 05:13 PM)Benjamin Wrote:

(05-27-2024, 08:06 PM)Shannon Wrote: I don't see any issues on our end.  Ben, do you see anything?

Which file(s) have you tried?  What checks have you done?

It's unusual you have this all of a sudden. As you've streamed multiple other programs right? Are you using the same device as before? Have you tried other browsers or devices? Could it be something with your connection?

As if it was an issue from here then multiple people would be reporting it.

(05-28-2024, 08:12 PM)CatMan Wrote: Hello, @Shannon !



Congrats on the release of OPHv2. Maybe this program can help for Arthritis? This new module sounds intriguing. I wonder what the future holds for it.



I'm curious, since it's been a little while now since release, have we had any information on how MEv3 is performing? I don't believe I've seen any journals on it yet, so I wanted to reach out.



Also, have you reached a decision on X4A-2000? I am VERY interested in it, but I'd need more info on how the process for it has gone, reports, and options to acquire it etc. I've been intrigued with what you've mentioned in previous journal entries. Just wanted to hear more about it.



Thank you for your time, Shannon. It sounds like you're continuing to make great progress towards 6G. Congratulations to you.

1. We have only two people who can test it, and both are seriously involved in LTRs they want to keep, so both of them are the worst possible option for testing this program to see how it would respond to being used by the actual intended audience (guys who are free to actually respond to interested women).  This is why it's taking so long.  However, our only tester suitable for testing these won't be able to test until August, and testing will be over by then.
   
2. We are - in spite of all of the testers' efforts to resist the program and sabotage the responders - STILL seeing very impressive results, although not quite the testing goals yet.  This is why we will continue testing.  I believe that in spite of everything that has gone wrong or been done to shut down results or whatever else, we will achieve the testing goals within the next 30 to 60 days.  And given how bad the circumstances are with regard to the options available to us for people to test it, and how much is working against our success in achieving the program's testing goals, the fact that we are seeing impressive results regardless just blows my mind. 
   

(06-03-2024, 01:06 PM)Frosted Wrote: @Shannon

I’m thinking of extending my OGSF2 run past the standard 6 months. How long can I go before you recommend moving on to something else?

Edit: Also, do you think it’s a waste of time to use EPHRA6 if I’m only going to use it for a few months?

(05-31-2024, 09:28 PM)geotrouvetout Wrote:

(05-29-2024, 05:13 PM)Benjamin Wrote: It's unusual you have this all of a sudden. As you've streamed multiple other programs right? Are you using the same device as before? Have you tried other browsers or devices? Could it be something with your connection?

As if it was an issue from here then multiple people would be reporting it.

@Benjamin Yes it is the first time and I have ran files for a long time with no problems with the same browser

(06-03-2024, 07:49 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(06-03-2024, 01:06 PM)Frosted Wrote: @Shannon

I’m thinking of extending my OGSF2 run past the standard 6 months. How long can I go before you recommend moving on to something else?

Edit: Also, do you think it’s a waste of time to use EPHRA6 if I’m only going to use it for a few months?

At the end of the instructions for how to use it, you'll see the number of months to use it that constitutes one run-through.  You're welcome to use it for as many run-throughs as you like, but try to use it for that much time per run-through to get the best results.  Basically, you can use it as long as you like, provided that you're still getting execution and not having subconscious boredom shut it down.

It's not a waste of time to use EHPRAv6 for a few months, but you should try to follow the instructions I talked about earlier concerning a single run-through.

(06-03-2024, 08:07 PM)Frosted Wrote:

(06-03-2024, 07:49 PM)Shannon Wrote: At the end of the instructions for how to use it, you'll see the number of months to use it that constitutes one run-through.  You're welcome to use it for as many run-throughs as you like, but try to use it for that much time per run-through to get the best results.  Basically, you can use it as long as you like, provided that you're still getting execution and not having subconscious boredom shut it down.

It's not a waste of time to use EHPRAv6 for a few months, but you should try to follow the instructions I talked about earlier concerning a single run-through.

Are you basically saying to treat the instructed amount of time like a minimum and if I want to do more I can? Or are you saying to stick to the instructed time as rigidly as possible and that I can go over it if I want but I’ll get diminishing returns?

(06-03-2024, 10:50 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(06-03-2024, 08:07 PM)Frosted Wrote: Are you basically saying to treat the instructed amount of time like a minimum and if I want to do more I can? Or are you saying to stick to the instructed time as rigidly as possible and that I can go over it if I want but I’ll get diminishing returns?

I am saying that one run-through should be the amount of months specified in the instructions to achieve the best results.  If you want to do more, then do another full run-through at a time for the best results.  The only exception is to combat subconscious boredom.

(06-04-2024, 01:52 AM)Frosted Wrote:

(06-03-2024, 10:50 PM)Shannon Wrote: I am saying that one run-through should be the amount of months specified in the instructions to achieve the best results.  If you want to do more, then do another full run-through at a time for the best results.  The only exception is to combat subconscious boredom.

Okay glad I got verification. I suppose that means I’ll be moving on to EPHRA6. 

Thank you for the advice and thank you for making these experiences public and for everyone to use. My OGSF2 results are crazy inspiring to me and I almost feel like I’m in a dream with the results I’m seeing. Keep doing awesome work!

(06-04-2024, 06:04 AM)HD87 Wrote: @Shannon  is self esteem still going to be built next?