Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691

RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - AlphaRomeo - 07-09-2016

(07-09-2016, 09:40 AM)Hercules Wrote:
(07-09-2016, 08:57 AM)dissonance Wrote: Shannon, when AM7 comes out, is it gonna be single stage or multi-stage? Or you don't know yet?

Expect mid to late 2018. It's gonna have to be multi stage unless he creates the SSGS technology (Super Set Goal Scripting which instructs the subconscious to program a certain part of the script after each goal has been completed. ASC will be done by the end of the year but he will have multiple releases so it will probably be finalized in April 2017 then will probably finish all the single stage programs on his list by July 2017 the will start AM7 using his experience.

Hey man,
Where did you get this timeline, or is it just a rough questimate? Don´t mean to be d**k, just wondering since I have often seen on this forum members just throwing some wild figures and later Shannon quoting them with something along the lines of "Where did you get that? I never said..."
If Shannon has given somewhere that timeline, cool...if not then there is no reason for giving possibly false hopes for people....

RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-09-2016

There's no timeline.

RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Trend - 07-09-2016

(07-09-2016, 05:56 AM)chaosvrgn Wrote: Fix that sh*t. Quit making excuses. Go out, stop trying to be "friends" with a woman and make it clear you wanna be her lover.

That's right, less frustration for both; too many people are afraid to be honest with each other.

RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - ncbeareatingman - 07-09-2016

you NAILED it JJ54 Man. beliefs.
it gets deeper than I can or am willing to write about here and it takes work Im not gonna kid ja, but you nailed it. more power to ya both dillettante and you man. Keith.



(07-09-2016, 06:58 AM)Dilettante Wrote: I am a hispanic-looking shorter asian man but I can relate to terry's and catman's dilemma. I don't get a lot of attention either. so yeah I don't have my +5 bonus either but I'm just as disadvantaged as white men in the dating game.

women like confidence and black men have self confidence whereas I willingly admit have doubts about myself. women in the west tend to be very self assured and confident this seeking a mate that supercedes her confidence.

it's also a pattern I've observed over and over, that black men, who are self confident (willing to approach hard and risk rejection) tend to go home with women from the club/bar/whatever at the end of the night. whereas my charming but demurred self goes home alone. It's definitely frustrating when women seem to choose the same type of guys over and over.

will you be discounting my experiences as stupid ass too?

What chaosvrgn is trying to say that it is all in your beliefs. If you think you don't have the confidence to get women, then guess what, you will never get the women that you desire. You set the tone of your reality, the women and the outside world only verifies it to you. That's why beliefs are important for the subconscious mind. Because what you believe is what your subconscious will verify to you.

I'll use myself as an example. I'm a black man myself, and I have a preference for Asian women. Am I their first choice most of the time? No, because they will usually go for white men before they go for black men. Now I can easily create a belief in my mind that "Asian women only like white men." However, that's not my belief. My belief is "Asian women love black men." And wouldn't you know it, I'm now attracting Asian women into my life.

So no, I'm not discounting your belief as stupid. But I will say that you need to change your belief that you're not self-confident. If you know women are attracted to you, then you will have no problem attracting the women you want.
[/quote]

RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Daredevil - 07-09-2016

(07-09-2016, 11:37 AM)AlphaRomeo Wrote:
(07-09-2016, 09:40 AM)Hercules Wrote:
(07-09-2016, 08:57 AM)dissonance Wrote: Shannon, when AM7 comes out, is it gonna be single stage or multi-stage? Or you don't know yet?

Expect mid to late 2018. It's gonna have to be multi stage unless he creates the SSGS technology (Super Set Goal Scripting which instructs the subconscious to program a certain part of the script after each goal has been completed. ASC will be done by the end of the year but he will have multiple releases so it will probably be finalized in April 2017 then will probably finish all the single stage programs on his list by July 2017 the will start AM7 using his experience.

Hey man,
Where did you get this timeline, or is it just a rough questimate? Don´t mean to be d**k, just wondering since I have often seen on this forum members just throwing some wild figures and later Shannon quoting them with something along the lines of "Where did you get that? I never said..."
If Shannon has given somewhere that timeline, cool...if not then there is no reason for giving possibly false hopes for people....

Guesstimations. And I think Shannon said that ASC would be created 9-12 months from January and AM7 would be finished late 2017. I don't believe in these figures but all in all I think AM7 will come out after 2018 due to the fact that Shannonshe estimated creation time for a 6G sub will be long and he still has to create a skeleton script for the 6G model.

RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - AlphaRomeo - 07-09-2016

(07-09-2016, 12:21 PM)Hercules Wrote:
(07-09-2016, 11:37 AM)AlphaRomeo Wrote:
(07-09-2016, 09:40 AM)Hercules Wrote:
(07-09-2016, 08:57 AM)dissonance Wrote: Shannon, when AM7 comes out, is it gonna be single stage or multi-stage? Or you don't know yet?

Expect mid to late 2018. It's gonna have to be multi stage unless he creates the SSGS technology (Super Set Goal Scripting which instructs the subconscious to program a certain part of the script after each goal has been completed. ASC will be done by the end of the year but he will have multiple releases so it will probably be finalized in April 2017 then will probably finish all the single stage programs on his list by July 2017 the will start AM7 using his experience.
Hey man,
Where did you get this timeline, or is it just a rough questimate? Don´t mean to be d**k, just wondering since I have often seen on this forum members just throwing some wild figures and later Shannon quoting them with something along the lines of "Where did you get that? I never said..."
If Shannon has given somewhere that timeline, cool...if not then there is no reason for giving possibly false hopes for people....

Guesstimations. And I think Shannon said that ASC would be created 9-12 months from January and AM7 would be finished late 2017. I don't believe in these figures but all in all I think AM7 will come out after 2018 due to the fact that Shannonshe estimated creation time for a 6G sub will be long and he still has to create a skeleton script for the 6G model.

Ok. Well, let´s hope those questimates will turn out to be roughly correct (if not earlier, in the best case scenarios)...given the fact that shannon said:
(07-09-2016, 11:56 AM)Shannon Wrote: There's no timeline.
...right after my previous comment. Well...will take what it will take,no hurry here. Tho I am hoping for an update to BASE2.1 at some point, like some other members running that sub, but I know it will be way down the road.

RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - bogdy - 07-09-2016

(07-09-2016, 09:40 AM)Hercules Wrote:
(07-09-2016, 08:57 AM)dissonance Wrote: Shannon, when AM7 comes out, is it gonna be single stage or multi-stage? Or you don't know yet?

Expect mid to late 2018. It's gonna have to be multi stage unless he creates the SSGS technology (Super Set Goal Scripting which instructs the subconscious to program a certain part of the script after each goal has been completed. ASC will be done by the end of the year but he will have multiple releases so it will probably be finalized in April 2017 then will probably finish all the single stage programs on his list by July 2017 the will start AM7 using his experience.

You forgot about Ray's imagination sub 6g Big Grin
(ray just a joke, nothing personal Tongue)

RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - sushi521 - 07-09-2016

We should vote for the next sub after GPR and MHS 5.5g. What do you guys think?

RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Benjamin - 07-09-2016

Really Chaosvrgn? Yes obviously you disagree and that's cool. But starting to attack members by calling them retards, stupid ass and comapring them to Elliot Rogers isn't.

[Rules 5,6,7,8 "Flaming" others, flame wars, and unnecessary rudeness and arguing are prohibited.
Flaming others, flame wars and rudeness are never necessary.
Disagreements are inevitable; civility is required. Be kind, polite and considerate to each other at all times.
Have decorum. Use appropriate and clean language. This is a public forum where we discuss things in a civil (and hopefully friendly) manner, not a barbarian camp.]

RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - chaosvrgn - 07-09-2016

(07-09-2016, 05:25 PM)Benjamin Wrote: Really Chaosvrgn? Yes obviously you disagree and that's cool. But starting to attack members by calling them retards, stupid ass and comapring them to Elliot Rogers isn't.

[Rules 5,6,7,8 "Flaming" others, flame wars, and unnecessary rudeness and arguing are prohibited.
Flaming others, flame wars and rudeness are never necessary.
Disagreements are inevitable; civility is required. Be kind, polite and considerate to each other at all times.
Have decorum. Use appropriate and clean language. This is a public forum where we discuss things in a civil (and hopefully friendly) manner, not a barbarian camp.]

I never called anyone a "retard" -- that word isn't any of my posts. It's not a word I use because I have a cousin that's mentally challenged and he's had to deal with that his entire life. I said the view that black men are stealing up all the white women is "stupid ass" not the actual person. But I'm going to be real and honest here: Yeah, I'm a bit on edge and went hard. Why? Am I the only person watching the news?

I ain't on some SJW "safe spaces" nonsense and I don't believe in censorship, but there's nowhere a black man can go to avoid listening to a bunch of BS. Can't ever read the comments of ANY website without hearing a bunch of nonsense about black people ruining someone's life.

Crime in America? Black people. Welfare? Black people (despite the fact that statistics show that it's a pretty even split between the races). And then, I come here, thinking this is a community of rather enlightened people and what do I see?

The black bogeymen are stealing up all the women. Really? If black people fail -- society says we suck. If black people win -- society says we suck. If we get money -- we suck. If we get women -- we suck. At a certain point, you get tired of seeing it, so you start telling people to STFU and deal with their problems, because that's what Black America's being told all the time.

"This is a post-racial society, if you can't make it, it's because you suck. STOP BEING A VICTIM!"
- America

Meanwhile, people are sneaking online talking about how black people suck and are stealing up all the women. And we see and hear this everyday, and if we dare say something, it's "omg chaosvrgn, why are you so mad?!?!?!?!" Or, how about a few pages later on this thread when the guy claimed that only "aggressive white women" are into black men. In other words, low quality and undesirable. The soft and demure women would NEVER go for a black man. Hate to tell you, I've been with many white women, and very few of them were "aggressive," but whatever.

I'm at a place in my life where I cannot stand by and just calmly listen to such nonsense. But I'm a businessman, I get it: this is a company, one that cannot allow the #angryblackman to run off people, regardless of how ridiculous their views are. I do have to question why me saying "stupid ass" is so offensive, but no one blinks at the claim that black men only attracts "aggressive white women." But I get it, yada yada freezed peach.

So, I'll watch my words in the future, keep it on the more civil side, but I'm not making any promises of being silent in the face of those kinda comments. And if that means you've gotta fire me as a client and/or eject me from the community, then I guess that's just the natural order of things.

RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - dissonance - 07-09-2016

I think this started because CatMan said "them" in his post, and you thought he was referring to black men, but I think he just meant the stereotypical "bad boy". I'm not sure though. I doubt Catman was referring to black people. If he was though I agree that's a bit uncalled for and I get your furor.

If you look at post 5037, the quoted section has a paragraph of his own posting where he refers to bad boys. I think that's what he was referring to when he said "them" in his post that you responded to and thought he was referring to black people. Not sure.

On a side note, be grateful you're not Chinese or another East Asian like me. I'm pretty sure we have it the hardest. Though I'm beginning to rise above that lately and soon I'll change that stereotype. Plus I was in Europe and a decent # of girls there and women gave me lots of eye fucking and IOIs Wink Wink Wink. Here's to the rise of East Asian sex icons in America eh. I'm gonna become the first.

RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - chaosvrgn - 07-09-2016

(07-09-2016, 07:00 PM)dissonance Wrote: I think this started because CatMan said "them" in his post, and you thought he was referring to black men, but I think he just meant the stereotypical "bad boy". I'm not sure though. I doubt Catman was referring to black people. If he was though I agree that's a bit uncalled for and I get your furor.

(07-09-2016, 04:02 AM)CatMan Wrote:
(07-09-2016, 03:57 AM)terry44 Wrote: Yes, they call men superficial and yet are incredibly impressed by height. And when I was younger and used to go clubbing with a group of people I knew, my black friends did so much better than my white or Asian friends. I mean women used to literally chat them up, but look right through the rest of us.

I can vouch for that.

I've been out of style apparently my whole life, and have gone through the EXACT experience you listed, all through high school, college, club scene, you name it. Yep. Infuriating to me, and led to many beliefs and anger and jealousy, over my life towards "them", I'll admit. Not going further than that, as I don't want any forum rules broken.

EDIT: If he were referring to the "bad boys," why would he be worried about breaking the forum rules? There's no rules against hating bad boys. And I wonder if any of them would say: "Man, women are so superficial. When I went clubbing, they ONLY went for us white guys and totally ignored my black friends."

RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - ncbeareatingman - 07-09-2016

I soooo agree Benjamin !!

RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - chaosvrgn - 07-09-2016

(07-09-2016, 07:39 PM)yeah! Wrote: Are you running AM and V2 chaos and if so how?

Haven't actually run V2 yet because I didn't want to derail my AM6 run after it took a turn for the awesome. I have a date on Wednesday with someone I'm very much interested in, though. Might run it then.

I'm not going through resistance. I've been running AM6 for a year now -- I'm very much aware of what my resistance phases feel like. I'm angry because the anger is justified. There's this ridiculous mentality in America that there's something wrong with being angry. So, they suppress and hold it all in, and end up destroying themselves. There's nothing wrong with being angry in the face of mistreatment.