Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - dissonance - 11-10-2015 Yeah true, never know till you try eh? Also about the "may not be a relationship that lasts very long for that reason", and making the gate smaller by making it Long Term Stunning Beautiful, I think Girlfriend opens that "gate" wider; I'm not sure though, plus Manifest Girlfriend 5Gs are for the future so yeah. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - ffaux - 11-10-2015 (11-10-2015, 01:05 AM)Shannon Wrote: I'm rather very curious as to how that one will work, since such females are rare and in very high demand. That will probably require more energy and/or time to manifest her, since such females tend to have what I call a "pack of dogs" following them around. Maybe specifying physical beauty creates an unnecessary limitation. Keeping stunningly beautiful leaves the beauty open to be more widely interpreted. Maybe we'll get more internally beautiful women that way. Maybe unisex isn't a good goal here. I'm really curious about this program if you make it stunningly beautiful. I'm torn between that and restarting AM6 again next but I don't really know how to choose. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Survivor - 11-10-2015 Douglas raises some good points. I trust Shannon completely, but the cult forming around Shannon on the forum is not helping us objectively.Also we have to note something interesting: nobody posts about FAILED program in the testimonial section, it is only full of positive results. But in the journals, we see failed results.. By the way, I didn't see much from Am6, I am running it again now. It seems that the programs work for some people and not for others with resistant personalities.. it seems that some programs work for particular person, others not.. some people don't listen properly .. and some people need more runs as they are way behind what the programs are trying to achieve.. 6G should handle most of the resistant personalities issue. However,one of the biggest reason is FEAR-deeply rooted limiting fear. The problem comes when we have a resistant personality,fear,strong will , all at the same time,and at the same type being far away from the goal of the program. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - AriGold - 11-10-2015 I would like the product pages to be really about that product and that product version. A testimonial for an earlier version of that program is nice, but newer versions of the same program act differently, so I think it's misleading if testimonials of earlier versions are put up directly at the product page. Please change that. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Soaring - 11-10-2015 Manifest Your Perfect Dominant Police Officer Sexual Lover 5G Manifest Your Perfect Tits and Ass Sexual Lover 5G Manifest Your Perfect Horny Midget Sexual Lover 5G Manifest Your Perfect Gummy Granny Sexual Lover 5G ...That's all. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Survivor - 11-10-2015 (11-10-2015, 08:17 AM)Douglas Wrote: But I thought the same was said for 4G and 5G handling resistant personality issues? As I mentioned previously the older journals didn't have so much failed result (atleast from what I read). The programs are simply sets of instructions.Whether the change will occur or not depends on whether or not your subconscios mind will accept this set of instruction.Once it accepts it as valid, it begins to act on it as being valid, and it becomes your external reality( or put in another way, first accepted internally as a reality and then becoming external reality).So, it's us who make the change, not the subs themselves. They are just a set of instructions. Andd yes, every generation deals with resistant personalities better.According to Shannon,these programs can be stonewalled COMPLETELY by 1-2-3% of the population. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Light - 11-10-2015 Attract Your Perfect Submissive Sexual Lover attarct your perfect Ass sexual lover RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - AlphaRomeo - 11-10-2015 ^^^^ Guys...go here to vote: http://subliminal-talk.com/thread-6187.html RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - dissonance - 11-10-2015 (11-10-2015, 08:10 AM)Survivor Wrote: Douglas raises some good points. I trust Shannon completely, but the cult forming around Shannon on the forum is not helping us objectively.Also we have to note something interesting: nobody posts about FAILED program in the testimonial section, it is only full of positive results. But in the journals, we see failed results.. Hmm I'm thinking about that, and I think your "strong will" may actually be a weak will. You know deep down that you want to change and improve, but you haven't had the will to do that by yourself in the past. Hence you turn to subliminals. And even with the subliminals, your subconscious and conscious mind both know you need to change and improve your life, but are not willfully changing. I think the more accurate thing to say is, you have a lot and very deep-rooted subconscious fear, which resists the program, and prevents you from taking action during your run. I for one, am certain I gained many great improvements in inner self, but my subconscious fear prevented me from taking action, and actually changing my actual predicament and situation in life. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Benjamin - 11-10-2015 The only manipulator here is you 'Douglas'. You are NOT a potential customer for AM and SM as you already have them and you're just here starting shit and pretending you are somebody else when there has been direct evidence that you are Ryan. So yes you will continue being deleted because you are not legit or genuine at all. And everyone else, we don't delete negative reviews and such just people who are here to troll and cause issues. He is the same person that has been trolling and abusing everyone for months. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - TangoDelta - 11-10-2015 (11-10-2015, 03:12 PM)Benjamin Wrote: The only manipulator here is you 'Douglas'. You are NOT a potential customer for AM and SM as you already have them and you're just here starting shit and pretending you are somebody else when there has been direct evidence that you are Ryan. So yes you will continue being deleted because you are not legit or genuine at all. Would you tolerate a thread for the skeptics/trolls to ask their questions and argue and fight and flame, to a certain extent? I read Douglas' post before you deleted it, and I didn't think there was anything uncivil about it, in fact, I agreed with a few of his arguments, and disagreed with others. I haven't purchased SM3 yet because I haven't seen definitive evidence that it does what is claimed. Maybe a thread for arguing would be bad for business?...I don't know. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Dzemoo - 11-10-2015 guys if you like shanons stuff and want to use it then do it if dont then dont, i think if shanon could make the programs any better he would do it RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Chopp - 11-10-2015 (11-10-2015, 04:54 PM)TangoDelta Wrote:(11-10-2015, 03:12 PM)Benjamin Wrote: The only manipulator here is you 'Douglas'. You are NOT a potential customer for AM and SM as you already have them and you're just here starting shit and pretending you are somebody else when there has been direct evidence that you are Ryan. So yes you will continue being deleted because you are not legit or genuine at all. I believe that that the real issue is that he continues to change his tactics to cause confusion, create random accounts to agree with himself, and lie (I have PMs from him doing exactly that). I personally find that reason enough to remove his posts, especially since Shannon warned in his journal that creating additional accounts after being banned would result in being banned again. Additionally, I have a sneaking suspicion that he has a motive behind his actions based on something he said in his original "farewell" (flame) post. I'm just waiting for him to spring it. In regards to your additional concerns, have you posted them anywhere? I'm sure doing so in a respectful manner (unlike Ryan) and in a place that Shannon looks would be answered. People can see for themselves already that the magnets are not producing the desired results, and none of those journal posts have been deleted. Hell, my run of SM3 was mostly uneventful, but personally I would like to run it again before deciding. Edit: It suddenly occurred to me that without a history of what has transpired, certain people are free to totally reinvent themselves - in essence taking on a victim role, with no historical context. Perhaps a hall of shame is in order. Keep in mind, it is not always the significance of the arguments that I hold issue with; it is the manner in which they are presented. A man can make a point without belittlement, nor ulterior motives. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Dilettante - 11-10-2015 (10-31-2014, 09:45 PM)Shannon Wrote: You have to use it for long enough, or it cannot "weave together the threads of fate" for you properly. The reason these programs work so slowly is because they must rely on using passive manifestation. Fully active manifestation is only just now becoming a possibility for this type of program, and I am far from ready to start producing fully active manifestation programs. seen here in regards to AYPSSL 4G http://subliminal-talk.com/thread-2764-post-62780.html#pid62780 Shannon, may I ask how close you are in achieving this in 6g. Is it achievable for the 6G AYP/MYP? |