Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Volume-3) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - findingme - 10-12-2018 Ben, I purchased USML last night at 5:01PM EST. I downloaded the file immediately after. Had you uploaded version 2 yet, or did I download version 1? FYI, I'm still on E2. I picked it up due to the fear removal modules. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Benjamin - 10-12-2018 (10-12-2018, 12:33 AM)findingme Wrote: Ben, Sounds like it might the the first version, though i'm not sure of the time difference. The way you know is by the filenames. The original will be named Ultra Success/Luck Magnifier. The new one is Ultra Success/Luck Maximizer. I'm curious about the fear removal modules myself. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - findingme - 10-12-2018 Thanks Ben RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - samba99 - 10-12-2018 Shannon, 6 loops does make me wonder a bit too. With last uslm I was having amazing results with 1 loop. Then I had the idea to try 7 loops. I tried 7 loops for 3 days and I had some bad depression during the 3 days. but we shall see RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Determined - 10-12-2018 How far are we from realising 6G technology? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Fluffy - 10-12-2018 (10-11-2018, 07:26 PM)Shannon Wrote: So glad you're making it through relatively unscathed, Keith. You sure this did not effect you modeling the ASRB of 6 loops? ...Double split experiment and all that. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Kenshin - 10-12-2018 I just finished downloading the files but will wait for official release and instructions on how to use it from Shannon before I jump into it. I just checked and confirm that Ocean Surf file is actually Ultrasonic. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - mat422 - 10-12-2018 Shannon, I know this isn't easy work. It never is solving problems that nobody else has figured out yet. I admire your work ethic, but I see familiar patterns in your actions that lead to burnout. On one hand I know you have a product to deliver, but on the other hand this isn't quite as simple as just running a business. I think part of being successful with anything is knowing when to push and when to back off, and that's a fine line at times. This isn't a criticism. I just hope to see you get to a point in the future where you don't feel a never-ending pressure. I only ask this because I really relate to these over demanding patterns you exhibit. But do you feel that you might have some undiscovered or lingering beliefs that effect your behavior in this way? I might be wrong about this one, but I also feel as if when most people are under more stress their survival mechanisms kick in. Deep ingrained mechanisms that might have been developed in childhood. Obviously I don't know you super well, so I might just be getting these impressions based solely on the more stressful aspects of this whole process. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - enoch - 10-12-2018 Is the new USLM drop in replacement? Considering they would have different secondary ASRBs and user is in the middle of the secondary ASRB of the previous version. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Determined - 10-12-2018 (10-12-2018, 02:47 AM)mat422 Wrote: Shannon, I know this isn't easy work. It never is solving problems that nobody else has figured out yet. I admire your work ethic, but I see familiar patterns in your actions that lead to burnout. On one hand I know you have a product to deliver, but on the other hand this isn't quite as simple as just running a business. I think part of being successful with anything is knowing when to push and when to back off, and that's a fine line at times. Dude, just take a look at how some people here treat Shannon. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 10-12-2018 (10-12-2018, 12:07 AM)AstonMartin Wrote: I have a question: USLM Side A is more powerful than new Side B, and thats why it was not upgraded to V2? Or any other reason? USLM exists as Side A and Side B because I knew someone would get Side B and be too afraid of success to execute. Side B now includes the Fear Removal Modules, and if these perform as designed, they should do the same job that H&C was designed to do, but cut straight to the front of the line, as it were. H&C was an indirect route to the solution, and one which seems to fail because it's like a salmon trying to swim up a waterfall. The new method should simply put you at the spawning grounds, if we use the same analogy. Since I am so backed up, and B now should have the same end result as A but with a lot less side journey and hooplah, and because we need to test the FRM, we are going to leave A unchanged until I get DMSI 3.3 out (or at least for the time being). RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 10-12-2018 (10-12-2018, 02:05 AM)samba99 Wrote: Shannon, The loops per day surprised me, too. That was something I had to re-run the models on A LOT to believe it. But it was 6 loops, every time, that won. In looking for why, I found that this version will be generating more baseline resistance initially, and that is why we need more loops. Depression from 7 loops only means that some part of your subconscious felt hopeless to resist. Had you kept going, that would have been overcome. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 10-12-2018 (10-12-2018, 02:36 AM)Determined Wrote: How far are we from realising 6G technology? It will be released sometime in 2019. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 10-12-2018 (10-12-2018, 02:37 AM)Fluffy Wrote:(10-11-2018, 07:26 PM)Shannon Wrote: So glad you're making it through relatively unscathed, Keith. In the ~20 years I have been working with and developing the models, I have never seen them be wrong under the conditions that produced that answer. When I cannot get a series of modeling runs to agree, then I know I have a problem. Since I did not believe the answer at first, this one was the result of no less than 14 runs, and they all agreed. 6 is correct. |