![]() |
Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Thread-Vol-5) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Superman - 04-30-2021 I'll agree with the UMS2 TID. I was experiencing it pretty strongly a few weeks ago, then the forums attention shifted to OF3 and I noticed the improvements from the TID tapering off and reversing somewhat RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 04-30-2021 (04-30-2021, 11:53 AM)Rossignol17 Wrote:(04-26-2021, 05:56 AM)Shannon Wrote:(04-24-2021, 02:20 PM)Rossignol17 Wrote:(04-24-2021, 02:08 PM)fab10 Wrote: Hey @Rossignol17 , give it some time and maybe drink one or two more cups. In my case the caffeine effect came back in a few days (I also rely on caffeine to function, especially in the morning.) If the models told Shannon that the chemical override module improves the overall effect of the sub, chances you’d throw out the baby with the bath water if that module is taken out. YMMV but I recommend that you give it a chance. Because you were self admittedly getting better results from v3. I wanted you to consider what it says that that is the case, whether it be about your response to the script, or the power of later generations of subliminals. The module is identical in both versions, has not been changed for a long time. The ability to override the effects where they make themselves known is based on the limits of what the subconscious can do about a chemical state shift. I put this module in because it improves the effectiveness of the program for achieving the program goals. If you choose to override that - that is on you. Quote:Yes, I understand that the DRS is not the same as the chemical state shifting module, but is the state shifting module necessary for the DRS to work ? Not necessary, no. However, the state shift override makes everything work significantly better for the program user. Quote:From my start of using v3, I have never felt really sluggish on it, and I have used it while both caffeinated and non-caffeinated. I would like to try v4.2 again, but I always go back to the evidence that I have had my BEST results with v3. Maybe I will stay on v3 (that I started again a week ago) until I reach my 1 goal I have set, take a break and try v4.2 for a new goal or try something new. You always have something tempting to offer. It may be the fact that the skeleton script and build methods used in v4.2 are significantly more powerful, and thus cause you to notice the difference where you did not; it may be some sort of resistance to something; it may be something else, or some combination of these things. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 04-30-2021 (04-30-2021, 12:08 PM)London1 Wrote: I bought of v2 in Jan. Am I eligible for a free upgrade to v3? If your purchase date is 30 days or less from the date the next version is published, you are. It would seem, then, that you are not. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 04-30-2021 (04-30-2021, 12:46 PM)TheGreatAttractor Wrote:(04-30-2021, 11:15 AM)Shannon Wrote: I'm not planning on returning the prices to the levels they should be at this time. Right now I am focused on other things. But each program that is 5.75.xG will be going up in price to what it should have been all along, were it not for the pandemic. Right now everything is at the prices that were set for 5.5G. The idea is to wait a bit until things get better economically and financially. It will not happen right away, but it is coming. I'll worry about exactly when after I have finished a few of the programs I'm currently working on. Then I'll have time to find the right time to end the price deflation. But of course. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Rossignol17 - 04-30-2021 It may be the fact that the skeleton script and build methods used in v4.2 are significantly more powerful, and thus cause you to notice the difference where you did not; it may be some sort of resistance to something; it may be something else, or some combination of these things. Interesting answer Shannon. It gives me some things to think about. Maybe I actually like and respond better to a gentler approach ? After my run with v3 again, or if I attain my goal before the end of the 3 month cycle, I am going to run something with the more powerful tech. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Catman - 04-30-2021 Hi @Shannon, did you end up finishing the modelling/implementation for all of the ideas, today? Wondering about how the program is coming along. Just excited to hear about all of those ideas. Even one of those could blow the doors open for me once and for all. Hope things are going well! RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Rossignol17 - 04-30-2021 Also Shannon, in keeping with the theory that I like the "gentler" approach better in subliminals, would that indicate that the masked format would be better for me ? I have been re-reading my past journals and it seems like I always complained about hybrid format and seemed to do better with masked. I even got vertigo from hybrid in the past, that went away when I switched back to masked. I don't have any vertigo now, but I am wondering if I would respond better to the masked format ? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 04-30-2021 (04-30-2021, 03:40 PM)CatMan Wrote: Hi @Shannon, did you end up finishing the modelling/implementation for all of the ideas, today? Wondering about how the program is coming along. Just excited to hear about all of those ideas. Even one of those could blow the doors open for me once and for all. There are 10 ideas implemented, and the 11th (by far the most complex and challenging to script) is about 60% finished. After that I need to run though the remaining ideas one more time to verify that they are to be excluded (and if not, build them out) and then I begin the process of configuring the various parts of the script for the Platinum Lake build method. Once that is finished, I can begin the actual build. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 04-30-2021 (04-30-2021, 04:22 PM)Rossignol17 Wrote: Also Shannon, in keeping with the theory that I like the "gentler" approach better in subliminals, would that indicate that the masked format would be better for me ? I have been re-reading my past journals and it seems like I always complained about hybrid format and seemed to do better with masked. I even got vertigo from hybrid in the past, that went away when I switched back to masked. I don't have any vertigo now, but I am wondering if I would respond better to the masked format ? It would seem to suggest that masked format would be the best choice for you. Especially reacting to Hybrid format with vertigo. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Rossignol17 - 04-30-2021 (04-30-2021, 07:15 PM)Shannon Wrote:(04-30-2021, 04:22 PM)Rossignol17 Wrote: Also Shannon, in keeping with the theory that I like the "gentler" approach better in subliminals, would that indicate that the masked format would be better for me ? I have been re-reading my past journals and it seems like I always complained about hybrid format and seemed to do better with masked. I even got vertigo from hybrid in the past, that went away when I switched back to masked. I don't have any vertigo now, but I am wondering if I would respond better to the masked format ? Thank you for giving us the 3 different formats to choose from. I am going back to masked and I will report if anything changes. I always use the FLAC audio with wired speakers, headphones, or earbuds. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Catman - 04-30-2021 (04-30-2021, 07:13 PM)Shannon Wrote:(04-30-2021, 03:40 PM)CatMan Wrote: Hi @Shannon, did you end up finishing the modelling/implementation for all of the ideas, today? Wondering about how the program is coming along. Just excited to hear about all of those ideas. Even one of those could blow the doors open for me once and for all. Remarkable, so there may be more ideas implemented if they can show promise. Very cool and encouraging. Sounds like things are really humming along then. That's fantastic to hear! RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - ncbeareatingman - 05-01-2021 (04-30-2021, 11:11 AM)Shannon Wrote:(04-29-2021, 11:21 PM)ncbeareatingman Wrote: Shannon, Ohhhh It will be no doubt it WILL Be,Shannon.... this morning I had this exeperience where, this energy,this awareness was just full throttle in my solar plexus,mind,and heart of an Indominable spirit of winning,. I Must win,it has to be, It WILL be ,it already is...all of this and more ALL at once....being a winner. TID of UMSv2! This is the second day in a row where some really clear and strong TID stuff,has come thru from UMSv2 wondering if I outta start a journal on it??? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 05-01-2021 (05-01-2021, 02:16 AM)ncbeareatingman Wrote:(04-30-2021, 11:11 AM)Shannon Wrote:(04-29-2021, 11:21 PM)ncbeareatingman Wrote: Shannon, Can't hurt. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 05-01-2021 (04-30-2021, 08:04 PM)CatMan Wrote:(04-30-2021, 07:13 PM)Shannon Wrote:(04-30-2021, 03:40 PM)CatMan Wrote: Hi @Shannon, did you end up finishing the modelling/implementation for all of the ideas, today? Wondering about how the program is coming along. Just excited to hear about all of those ideas. Even one of those could blow the doors open for me once and for all. When I am working with script sections that have a high re-usability value, I can change smaller parts of the whole script statement instead of re-building the whole statement from scratch each time, and achieve equal if not better results with a much smaller amount of time required. If I had to build all 11 of these statements from scratch I would need 2-3 days each. Instead, I can re-use the beginning and the end of each statement, and only have to rebuild the middle part which actually tells the rest what to do, and I can finish 2-3 statements a day. Since each of these ideas can be expressed neatly in 1, or in rare occasions 2, statements, it is rapid work. That is how and why we are going so fast on this particular endeavor. |