+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Thread-Vol-5)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - UniversalMan - 04-28-2021
I just need to say this...@Shannon
Every person that does something good in resolving their baggage (whitch is what we do with with IML "self-help" subliminal audios like E4,LTU6...ecc), it is doing good not just to themself, but even for those around him, cause we are not just listening to IML subliminals, we even vibe them around...and of course as we resolve our problems that we have with ourselves, we are showing the way to other people to also resolve their problems,and like a ripple (or butterfly effect) the wave continues on...
Seems to me that Shannon is creating positive ripples in the space time continuum
I want to praise you @Shannon cause you are still doing good deeds in these times.
BRAVO SHANNON AND CREW!
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Catman - 04-28-2021
(04-28-2021, 07:37 AM)Shannon Wrote:(04-27-2021, 08:21 PM)AbundanceCH Wrote: Will the new UMS also be available for a discount with pre-orders?
Discount? No. Pre-orders? Only if I have no choice. Which, so far, is not the case.
For the record, don't mistake this for a discount on OF v3. It's not. It's the introductory price at which, according to the models, certain very important variables take on specific values that significantly benefit me and all of you for a long time to come. It is also an extremely rare event, which I have never seen before in the models, and I seriously doubt I will ever see again. So as I said in the announcement... don't expect this to happen again.
Hey @Shannon, does the program need to be out at a certain time for this to occur? Or does anyone who purchases it at that price benefit from this future somehow now? Is it a direct benefit? Or indirect like IML benefits, then us as customers benefit on some level?
How is the modelling going for the 18 or so planned improvements to FRM? Very exciting to see FRM 5.0 become a reality. Surprising to read that you are no longer considering the 5.0 the "final word" on FRM as what's been proposed before. I guess that's part of the issue of hitting a moving target. Still though, a step forward, so encouraging regardless.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - NOMAD - 04-28-2021
(04-28-2021, 07:37 AM)Shannon Wrote: ...according to the models, certain very important variables take on specific values that significantly benefit me and all of you for a long time to come.
I suspect that I have a partial understanding of what your'e saying here based on other posts you've made as well as my own reasons for running OFv2 to begin with.
Although I don't expect it, I really do wish you would elaborate on what you're seeing in the models. Many of us realize you're looking at probabilities versus 100% gospel truth, but we do appreciate being able to consider your insights.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 04-28-2021
(04-28-2021, 08:10 AM)CatMan Wrote:(04-28-2021, 07:37 AM)Shannon Wrote:(04-27-2021, 08:21 PM)AbundanceCH Wrote: Will the new UMS also be available for a discount with pre-orders?
Discount? No. Pre-orders? Only if I have no choice. Which, so far, is not the case.
For the record, don't mistake this for a discount on OF v3. It's not. It's the introductory price at which, according to the models, certain very important variables take on specific values that significantly benefit me and all of you for a long time to come. It is also an extremely rare event, which I have never seen before in the models, and I seriously doubt I will ever see again. So as I said in the announcement... don't expect this to happen again.
Hey @Shannon, does the program need to be out at a certain time for this to occur? Or does anyone who purchases it at that price benefit from this future somehow now? Is it a direct benefit? Or indirect like IML benefits, then us as customers benefit on some level?
The key was to have a price that was $20 below $114.95. That is all that was necessary, and I did that. We are on the probability line I was looking for. Thank you all.
The benefits that result in the short term are that we make a little bit more money than we would have otherwise (not enough for me to have done this just for that, mind you) but the program also gets FRM 5.0. It becomes, for reasons I can't discuss without altering things negatively, worth the time and effort to upgrade FRM to 5.0 now, instead of waiting. Which will have a lot of short, medium and long term benefits for us all.
There are other benefits as well that I'll leave un-mnetioned, and the cascade and butterfly effects of all this continue to spread out across the world for a long time in one way or another.
It's basically a rare opportunity to trip a domino that causes a domino effect in a lot of ways that are almost entirely very positive or moderately positive.
Quote:How is the modelling going for the 18 or so planned improvements to FRM? Very exciting to see FRM 5.0 become a reality. Surprising to read that you are no longer considering the 5.0 the "final word" on FRM as what's been proposed before. I guess that's part of the issue of hitting a moving target. Still though, a step forward, so encouraging regardless.
Allow me to clarify some things and prevent misunderstandings.
The 18 ideas are not guaranteed to be useful, or used. The initial modeling runs identified 3 major and 8 minor positive results. The rest are either definitely rejected (1) or possibly useful after the others have been added (the rest). I have been able to make use of previous scripting to create two of the three major modules already, and the third is in process. Once that is done, I will have to run through the remaining 9 (8+1 new idea) ideas and determine if they are still indicated as being a positive influence, which will be used in this particular version and in what order they must be added.
As for 5.0 being the "final word" I realized I made a mistake in my understanding of that modeling run. The result was that I was trying to artificially adjust the version numbering to fit what I thought was the prediction. When I realized I was doing that, I also realized that it was ridiculous to do that. Just do the best you can and move on, and re-iterate as necessary. Version numbers don't really mater as much as making progress, so to force myself out of that choice of action, this version is 5.0 instead of 4.10. No difference; it is what it is. If it's the end all be all, great. If not, we'll gather new ideas and repeat until it is. (Or at least as close as possible.)
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 04-28-2021
(04-28-2021, 08:17 AM)NOMAD Wrote:(04-28-2021, 07:37 AM)Shannon Wrote: ...according to the models, certain very important variables take on specific values that significantly benefit me and all of you for a long time to come.
I suspect that I have a partial understanding of what your'e saying here based on other posts you've made as well as my own reasons for running OFv2 to begin with.
Although I don't expect it, I really do wish you would elaborate on what you're seeing in the models. Many of us realize you're looking at probabilities versus 100% gospel truth, but we do appreciate being able to consider your insights.
Because I am looking at probabilities, the more I say, the more it alters the "future". So I shall remain silent. I'm more interested in experiencing this more positive future.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - NOMAD - 04-28-2021
(04-28-2021, 08:24 AM)Shannon Wrote:(04-28-2021, 08:17 AM)NOMAD Wrote:(04-28-2021, 07:37 AM)Shannon Wrote: ...according to the models, certain very important variables take on specific values that significantly benefit me and all of you for a long time to come.
I suspect that I have a partial understanding of what your'e saying here based on other posts you've made as well as my own reasons for running OFv2 to begin with.
Although I don't expect it, I really do wish you would elaborate on what you're seeing in the models. Many of us realize you're looking at probabilities versus 100% gospel truth, but we do appreciate being able to consider your insights.
Because I am looking at probabilities, the more I say, the more it alters the "future". So I shall remain silent. I'm more interested in experiencing this more positive future.
10-4. Say no more. Onward and upward. ::thumbs up::
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Catman - 04-28-2021
(04-28-2021, 08:23 AM)Shannon Wrote: The 18 ideas are not guaranteed to be useful, or used. The initial modeling runs identified 3 major and 8 minor positive results. The rest are either definitely rejected (1) or possibly useful after the others have been added (the rest). I have been able to make use of previous scripting to create two of the three major modules already, and the third is in process. Once that is done, I will have to run through the remaining 9 (8+1 new idea) ideas and determine if they are still indicated as being a positive influence, which will be used in this particular version and in what order they must be added.
I hear you on the rest, fair enough.
Just to follow up on this part above. So, we have 11 ideas so far that will be implemented, with another 9 to be tested for possible inclusion as well? Wow, that's fantastic. That's quite a lot to implement in one release. A lot of scripting required to make it all harmonious, no doubt. Really looking forward to this release and how it interacts with my issues. I hope my posts recently gave enough insight? I appreciate your detailed post earlier about me by the way.
The other day I got an intense feeling of what it'd be like to be rid of my fear(s), was amazing to think about and really get into. Was very exciting to finally be rid of that shit, it felt possible to do etc. and was quite a good feeling. Like euphoric, it felt like it was really going to happen with this release, I hope so and it isn't wishful thinking. Today that has dulled a bit, but still, the program is looking to be a big step forward so I'm excited to see it soon.
Thank you to everyone who purchased a copy of OF V3. I knew it'd be a successful release, just like OF V2.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 04-28-2021
(04-28-2021, 09:42 AM)CatMan Wrote:(04-28-2021, 08:23 AM)Shannon Wrote: The 18 ideas are not guaranteed to be useful, or used. The initial modeling runs identified 3 major and 8 minor positive results. The rest are either definitely rejected (1) or possibly useful after the others have been added (the rest). I have been able to make use of previous scripting to create two of the three major modules already, and the third is in process. Once that is done, I will have to run through the remaining 9 (8+1 new idea) ideas and determine if they are still indicated as being a positive influence, which will be used in this particular version and in what order they must be added.
I hear you on the rest, fair enough.
Just to follow up on this part above. So, we have 11 ideas so far that will be implemented, with another 9 to be tested for possible inclusion as well? Wow, that's fantastic. That's quite a lot to implement in one release. A lot of scripting required to make it all harmonious, no doubt. Really looking forward to this release and how it interacts with my issues. I hope my posts recently gave enough insight? I appreciate your detailed post earlier about me by the way.
The other day I got an intense feeling of what it'd be like to be rid of my fear(s), was amazing to think about and really get into. Was very exciting to finally be rid of that shit, it felt possible to do etc. and was quite a good feeling. Like euphoric, it felt like it was really going to happen with this release, I hope so and it isn't wishful thinking. Today that has dulled a bit, but still, the program is looking to be a big step forward so I'm excited to see it soon.
Thank you to everyone who purchased a copy of OF V3. I knew it'd be a successful release, just like OF V2.
Right now, we have 4 implemented, 1 in process, and 5 more definitely required for inclusion. One has been permanently rejected. 3 are still possible inclusions, and the rest are unlikely, but will be re-assessed once all this is completed.
That feeling you got of what it's like to be rid of your fears? That could very well be TID.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Omni3 - 04-28-2021
(04-28-2021, 11:39 AM)Shannon Wrote:(04-28-2021, 09:42 AM)CatMan Wrote:(04-28-2021, 08:23 AM)Shannon Wrote: The 18 ideas are not guaranteed to be useful, or used. The initial modeling runs identified 3 major and 8 minor positive results. The rest are either definitely rejected (1) or possibly useful after the others have been added (the rest). I have been able to make use of previous scripting to create two of the three major modules already, and the third is in process. Once that is done, I will have to run through the remaining 9 (8+1 new idea) ideas and determine if they are still indicated as being a positive influence, which will be used in this particular version and in what order they must be added.
I hear you on the rest, fair enough.
Just to follow up on this part above. So, we have 11 ideas so far that will be implemented, with another 9 to be tested for possible inclusion as well? Wow, that's fantastic. That's quite a lot to implement in one release. A lot of scripting required to make it all harmonious, no doubt. Really looking forward to this release and how it interacts with my issues. I hope my posts recently gave enough insight? I appreciate your detailed post earlier about me by the way.
The other day I got an intense feeling of what it'd be like to be rid of my fear(s), was amazing to think about and really get into. Was very exciting to finally be rid of that shit, it felt possible to do etc. and was quite a good feeling. Like euphoric, it felt like it was really going to happen with this release, I hope so and it isn't wishful thinking. Today that has dulled a bit, but still, the program is looking to be a big step forward so I'm excited to see it soon.
Thank you to everyone who purchased a copy of OF V3. I knew it'd be a successful release, just like OF V2.
Right now, we have 4 implemented, 1 in process, and 5 more definitely required for inclusion. One has been permanently rejected. 3 are still possible inclusions, and the rest are unlikely, but will be re-assessed once all this is completed.
That feeling you got of what it's like to be rid of your fears? That could very well be TID.
Now that's a something!!!
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - myth - 04-28-2021
I was hoping to preorder OF v3 today, but two different web browsers have handed me a "connection is not private"/"potential security risk" (NET::ERR_CERT_AUTHORITY_INVALID) error when going to the https version of subliminal-shop.com. Given that the last "connection is not private" report to the forum was roughly a year ago, I'm guessing that the site's cert recently expired.
The http link to the OF v3 preorder in Shannon's journal loads fine, of course, but that link's http, not https. Yeah, Paypal's where the payment happens, but I'd still rather not send my subliminal-shop.com account credentials (and the download access that they provide) over a plaintext protocol.
I'd have posted this in the troubleshooting or website sections of the forum, but, with the OF v3 introductory price deadline looming, it seemed like a good idea to mention it where people might see it sooner. Feel free to move this post if it doesn't belong here.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - StridingStrider - 04-28-2021
Pre-ordered v3. Thank you for the great deal!
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 04-28-2021
(04-28-2021, 02:29 PM)myth Wrote: I was hoping to preorder OF v3 today, but two different web browsers have handed me a "connection is not private"/"potential security risk" (NET::ERR_CERT_AUTHORITY_INVALID) error when going to the https version of subliminal-shop.com. Given that the last "connection is not private" report to the forum was roughly a year ago, I'm guessing that the site's cert recently expired.
The http link to the OF v3 preorder in Shannon's journal loads fine, of course, but that link's http, not https. Yeah, Paypal's where the payment happens, but I'd still rather not send my subliminal-shop.com account credentials (and the download access that they provide) over a plaintext protocol.
I'd have posted this in the troubleshooting or website sections of the forum, but, with the OF v3 introductory price deadline looming, it seemed like a good idea to mention it where people might see it sooner. Feel free to move this post if it doesn't belong here.
I have had Andrew explain this to me 3 times within the last 10 years as to why we don't have that, and every time he tells me it doesn't matter and why it doesn't matter, but I never remember it when the time comes to explain it to customers. Every time he does, it makes perfect sense, and there is a good reason it's not https. Unfortunately, he's not available to explain it. However, I don't think that's going to be an issue for much longer regardless.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - KingDavid93 - 04-28-2021
@Shannon
How long will the discount on OF V3 be going on for?
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 04-28-2021
(04-28-2021, 04:41 PM)KingDavid93 Wrote: @Shannon
How long will the discount on OF V3 be going on for?
There is no discount. There is a special circumstance that persuaded me to introduce this program at a slightly lower price than I was planning to for a short period of time. It will go back to $114.95 at the end of April.