Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Superman - 07-01-2016 (07-01-2016, 04:27 PM)Shannon Wrote: Full disclosure: Maybe you should run this version through your models predicting for performance but not tell us the results here on the forum just yet in order to prevent any placebo effect from influencing the test results Lol. The other members might hate me RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - chaosvrgn - 07-01-2016 (07-01-2016, 04:47 PM)Moniker Wrote: Hello out there. Thought I'd join the forum and express my excitement about the impending launch of V2.1. I plan to test and journal, and I was wondering whether my fellow testers planned to launch their own threads or post to Test Report thread. I'm posting the lengthy test reports to my journal and shortened, generalized results to the test report thread. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - RTBoss - 07-01-2016 (07-01-2016, 04:47 PM)Moniker Wrote: Hello out there. Thought I'd join the forum and express my excitement about the impending launch of V2.1. I plan to test and journal, and I was wondering whether my fellow testers planned to launch their own threads or post to Test Report thread. I plan on likely doing both. I just thought it'd be easier for Shannon if all test reports were in the same place (the test report thread). RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - K-Train - 07-01-2016 I'm thinking about doing both as RTBoss mentioned but posting a shorthand version in the Report Thread like Chaos suggested. I'm a lazy journaler but I haven't opened a journal up in a couple years so maybe I'm overdue for one. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Moniker - 07-01-2016 Sounds like a plan. Thanks guys. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-01-2016 Script weave out complete. Now recording audio. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - chaosvrgn - 07-01-2016 (07-01-2016, 04:51 PM)Superman Wrote: Maybe you should run this version through your models predicting for performance but not tell us the results here on the forum just yet in order to prevent any placebo effect from influencing the test results I'm fine without knowing anything. I actually completely skipped Shannon's reports because I wanted to go into this thing blind. I'm going to run it before doing Uber tomorrow night. It's Independence Day weekend for people in the states -- there's going to be entire tribes of beautiful women flocking to the clubs. My plan is to focus on two distinct timeframes: the "going to the club" period from around 9p - 10p. Gonna stop at 10, do some bar hopping with my cousin. Then, go back to Ubering from 2a - 3:30a. Something tells me the latter will be the "fun" hour. ... or I might just stay in and keep working on my business. We'll see. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-01-2016 Audio recording complete. Now processing audio. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-01-2016 Audio processing is almost complete. All that remains now is to calculate and implement the ASRB value, and then encode the files. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - apollolux - 07-01-2016 (07-01-2016, 04:06 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ ... ] Not too complex for me, I was able to understand your long sentence example from months ago just fine. I personally never had occasion to write such a thing because I've only ever needed to write academically for grades, so such run-on sentences were often forced to be split and reworked or "lose points," but having read the dictionary in my "free time" as a kid and studying grammar in conjunction with Latin classes to see how they could match up in English as well has afforded me a certain understanding of how one reads and understands written and spoken English and how a competently educated person should read and understand written and spoken English. So while yes, Shannon, you may indeed be the only person who actively writes such verbose language professionally and on such a regular basis, you are by no means the only one who can follow said language successfully. Feel free to test me if you choose, where the end result will simply be you will find me an equal in comprehending your scripts consciously as written. Yes, I know this post most likely will come across as excessively boastful. There's pretty much no other way to say "hey Shannon, you're wrong, I can totally understand your language" without sounding either boastful like above or like a child being contrary. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-01-2016 (07-01-2016, 07:14 PM)apollolux Wrote:(07-01-2016, 04:06 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ ... ] I don't mean to sound arrogant or boastful, and I know you don't either. But when I am talking about single sentences that get up into the 5 to 20 pages long typed at 12 point font range, you would fare no better than me at understanding it, and it requires that I work with it in paragraph sized chunks at a time. That issue is not the primary reason I would be hesitant to share it even if the last reason were not in play, but in having to spend extra time verifying that the grammar was understood by the person suggesting the change, which would essentially be me doing the same job, but taking longer to do it! EDIT: Now that I think about it, there are other reasons why you wouldn't be able to understand the language I use that have nothing to do with intelligence or education. It would require giving away even more secrets to make them comprehensible. Your history sounds like mine, actually. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-01-2016 ASRB is 10:1. Now creating ASRB adjusted audio files. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-01-2016 Creating the Ultrasonic file. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-01-2016 Building the mask for the ocean surf and vocoding ocean surf file. |