![]() |
Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Thread-Vol-5) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Yous - 04-10-2021 Everyone or many here has been helped by iml subliminals even if they dont give us all that the programs are intended to. It helps us healing, and being better, but achieving all the objectives of the programs is not the rule. We are in the way. We keep buying programs and supporting iml because its good for us and we believe in it, and i think it helps a lot, but as i said, if we would be already at he end of the path, many of us would be rich or would be really happy or sleeping with any girl we want, etc...hope we will get there soon, or at least much more near, or almost there. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Broski - 04-10-2021 I like the simplicity of a single stage, and if the models say it is close or a slight edge to one over 4, then that seems like the best bet to me. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - emiebou - 04-10-2021 Based on the comments that have emerged since Shannon announced UMS v2 will be 1 or 3 + 1 stages, it shows that UMS is one of the most awaited Subs (besides DMSI, of course: D). I agree that if UMS is sure to succeed in achieving its goals, even 10 stages will not be a problem. Even though I will choose 1 stage for me personally because of my financial condition. After using UMS v1, which didn't really work for me, then using OF v1 with newer technology and the effect was more pronounced, I really hope that UMS v2 with much more advanced technology will succeed. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - AbundanceCH - 04-10-2021 We already spoke about this a few months ago and most people were asking for a 1 stage sub. Glad to see the models suggest a 1 stage sub could give optimal results. Let's hope a decision is made soon i'll be waiting to buy the 1 stager if it happens. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - TouchyCat - 04-10-2021 (04-10-2021, 01:18 PM)Shannon Wrote: All told, I would much prefer to make it a single stage program and get on with other things. But, the multi-stage option gives is prevention of boredom, which some people have issues with on single stage programs, and it also helps work the user through somethings before exposing them to others. A more "build the foundation first" approach, which is generally a better approach to things this complex and which trigger this much fear. +1 for a one-stager UMS v2. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Superman - 04-10-2021 Wow this is really interesting, being able to decide the number of stages. I think we need a little more info before we can weigh in properly. We need to compare a few things between the 1 vs 4 stage options. Total Price for each option, difficulty and time for Shannon to build, and effectiveness of the subs overall. I've used both single and multi stage subs in the past. On a multi stage it does build the foundation better and in a certain order, but with these new Gen subs its not just set and forget. You need to follow loops and days on and off as well which may complicate things and throw off the progression to the next stage. Also with multi stage subs the results are usually slower and more gradual, maybe less noticeable to the user. With the single stage sub I think it's a little easier to stick to a routine and even if you miss a day, you're not delaying the start of another stage. And of course since the sub is going full force from the beginning there's always the chance it could work faster. I do like the idea of a single stage, but I don't want to sell ourselves short and get a lesser version since this probably won't be updated again for quite some time RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - TheGreatAttractor - 04-11-2021 @Shannon Regarding the UMS v2 - 1 stage or 3+1 stages question. Here's a possibility that may not have been considered: So all 5.75G subs have a secondary ASRB ratio (i.e use the sub X days on and Y days off). It may be possible to get around the issue of boredom with a single stage UMS by adding a 3rd order ASRB ratio. For example - use the sub for 3 days on and 5 days off for 80 days - then take an additional 10 days off. The 15 days off at the end could be enough time to get around the boredom, but not long enough to lose the momentum. It's worth a shot looking at the models to see if a 3rd order ASRB ratio would increase the effectiveness of the sub - for all the users in general, and specifically for the sub-category of users which experience subconscious boredom. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - fab10 - 04-11-2021 One stage programs are indeed much easier to run. I just switched from LTU6 to IYE and I realized how much more convenient it is - just one download, very easy to plan the calendar and constant listening time. That said, if the models were to show a significant difference in effectiveness (it’s still not very clear to me how final the models answer is), effectiveness should always go first, and the effectiveness itself would offset the price difference of course. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - AriGold - 04-11-2021 (04-11-2021, 10:22 AM)TheGreatAttractor Wrote: @Shannon I was also thinking that the boredom could mean ASRB3 for some time off to execute, get rid of boredom and start another bigger cycle. Shannon always talks about cycles, these are the good ones ![]() And with the 3+1 or single stage: the single stage is cheaper, but (!) we don't want cheap, we want the best results. With the modelling it might be complicated (I don't know exactly how it works) but if you ask question the devil is in the detail: So if you ask "which program makes more users a millionnaire?" If single stage is a lot cheaper and more people buy it, there is a higher chance that one more person will become a millionnaire. So it might be helpful to ask in percentage of users, not in absolute numbers (in my head the models will be like "you get the answers you asked for, so if you want that, I can also give you that" - yes, I know, the models do not participate in conversation, it was just in my head) Anyway whichever it is - 3+1 or single - I wish all of us a lot fun and success with it. With the 3+1 I was also thinking of a program like the seasons: One is for preparing (clearing out beliefs, etc - baseline programming but starting of manifesting), the second stage is mostly manifesting and the third one is being ready for the harvest, openness to receive the money, but also manifesting. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Nox - 04-11-2021 I want whichever ums2 version is most effective, but it would be nice if it was a single stage. They're just a lot handier to use. I already do things like those mentioned above to break through boredom or just to work through plateaus after I've done the 3 months. I'll listen an extra day or three and then go a week or two without listening to any subs before restarting them. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - lano1106 - 04-11-2021 I do prefer multi stage. Of all the multi-stage programs that I have done, the most enjoyable moment was starting a new stage. Each time, it felt like starting a new program with new effects on its own. The changes provided by the new stage is felt pretty fast after 1-2 days of usage. Then as the 30 days period advance, this changing feeling attenuates as the change is normalized/internalized. I don't have this progression feeling with single state programs... No idea how much the feeling that I describe is real and how much of it is placebo but I like it very much... Shannon could make a test... A multi stage program which is in fact a single stage audio copied x times just to find out the placebo effect vs the real benefits of a true multi-stage program... Bottomline, I don't really care which is which. The described feeling of progression is what I like the most of multi-stage programs and this is where my vote goes for UMSv2. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - GreekGod22 - 04-12-2021 (04-10-2021, 09:51 AM)samba99 Wrote: Shannon, I have been getting massive TDI from UMS2. I am currently using AOL.This makes no sense since it's not been released. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - tolgaocal80 - 04-12-2021 (04-12-2021, 09:32 AM)GreekGod22 Wrote:(04-10-2021, 09:51 AM)samba99 Wrote: Shannon, I have been getting massive TDI from UMS2. I am currently using AOL.This makes no sense since it's not been released. go read for TID, it makes very sense because of it is not released RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - K-Train - 04-12-2021 Hey Shannon quick question. Sometime this year or the next, would you consider rebuilding Aura of Sexiness utilizing the same tech from AOL? It would potentially provide a way for people to get a bit of a taste of DMSI without running the full program. Also, it would (I assume) being using similar tech to what is currently available. The same could be done for other aura based programs that are 5G and older. |