(09-23-2018, 03:15 AM)findingme Wrote: Ben, I'm seeking your imput on something which has tagged itself onto my E2 ride these last 2 months. Women have been eyeing me heavily while on E2. Last night, on my way home from my friend's house, I stopped at a grocery store to pick something up. When I was about to leave, 2 young women walked in. It caught my attention since one had an infant carrier in her hand, and quickly looking, I assumed the second woman was her daughter. I caught eyes with the second, maybe a 7, who obviously was not her daughter, and we held looks. She was the same age, and......I wasn't ready for this. So, I looked away. It stuck with me since ......I was still slightly mad from my visit with the guys, but this has happened almost every single weekend.

I've never found your E2 journal, but you've mentioned you got laid while on E2. I have just found it strange since E2 has such an inner focus. Well, I've kept everything inside most of my life. But these stares, to me, are attention getting. I got directly ogled by a woman standing next to her husband last week while grocery shopping. Her look said it all. She even followed me down another aisle.

It's funny how an introvert (myself) is being pulled out of his shell by a healing subliminal. But was the attraction thing a constant for you while running E2?

Quote:What should I do?

Something isn' right, but I downloaded straight from the links on your webshop, I don't get it. Do I need to download everything again? How do I fix this?

Also I ran 2 days of this broken file, is this a problem? Should I take some days off? Yesterday was a listening day but I didn't listen to the files because there's something wrong. How do I proceed? Do I have to take days off? Anyone please chime in.

(09-23-2018, 09:20 AM)Shannon Wrote:

(09-23-2018, 01:15 AM)Ricardo Wrote:

(09-20-2018, 03:43 AM)CatMan Wrote: [quote='Roy' pid='206029' dateline='1537441279']
[quote='CatMan' pid='206023' dateline='1537432675']


I also don't really have a dog in the fight in the end, as I'm still not convinced the program will end up executing as the sales page conceptualises for the majority. Just seems like way too much of a leap from where things are now, to widespread results as conceptualised. Hard for me to get on board with until I see strongly encouraging results in line with it. I think I'll need a pretty large turnaround in results to believe in it. Just speaking about the history of AS and what he has said about what it may be doing, is all, done now. No interest in protracted walls of text. Whatever Shannon ends up going for is what we will have. I'm fine with it. I am not nearly as women focused as I used to be long ago, so it is definitely more of a side pursuit now. I do not know if that is some IDGAF, or just a counter reaction to failing to get traction with women. Either way, my interest has definitely fallen a great deal over the last year+. Which is good, I was too 'thirsty ' anyway and that is known to be a big turnoff. I felt low self respect for chasing like that too, so I view this new attitude as an improvement, regardless.

I have to echo this. When I look round in my daily life and see guys who just wouldn't be able to attract a fly, I wonder how DMSI could possibly work for them. The design goals are too ambitious. If DMSI works it would change mankind forever and Shannon would probably end up with more money than Soros and Bezos put together!
I think it would be more pragmatic to go with 5.5/6G AYP's.

We already know DMSI "works". It just does not work as intended yet. If it didn't work, nobody would have achieved the design goals.

(09-23-2018, 09:55 PM)Ricardo Wrote:

(09-23-2018, 09:20 AM)Shannon Wrote:

(09-23-2018, 01:15 AM)Ricardo Wrote:

(09-20-2018, 03:43 AM)CatMan Wrote: [quote='Roy' pid='206029' dateline='1537441279']
[quote='CatMan' pid='206023' dateline='1537432675']


I also don't really have a dog in the fight in the end, as I'm still not convinced the program will end up executing as the sales page conceptualises for the majority. Just seems like way too much of a leap from where things are now, to widespread results as conceptualised. Hard for me to get on board with until I see strongly encouraging results in line with it. I think I'll need a pretty large turnaround in results to believe in it. Just speaking about the history of AS and what he has said about what it may be doing, is all, done now. No interest in protracted walls of text. Whatever Shannon ends up going for is what we will have. I'm fine with it. I am not nearly as women focused as I used to be long ago, so it is definitely more of a side pursuit now. I do not know if that is some IDGAF, or just a counter reaction to failing to get traction with women. Either way, my interest has definitely fallen a great deal over the last year+. Which is good, I was too 'thirsty ' anyway and that is known to be a big turnoff. I felt low self respect for chasing like that too, so I view this new attitude as an improvement, regardless.

I have to echo this. When I look round in my daily life and see guys who just wouldn't be able to attract a fly, I wonder how DMSI could possibly work for them. The design goals are too ambitious. If DMSI works it would change mankind forever and Shannon would probably end up with more money than Soros and Bezos put together!
I think it would be more pragmatic to go with 5.5/6G AYP's.

We already know DMSI "works". It just does not work as intended yet. If it didn't work, nobody would have achieved the design goals.

That rather pre-supposes that anyone who had sex while listening to the sub did so because of it. You don't seem to accept that it might have happened anyway for them. I'm not having a go but I sometimes feel that you are the one with limiting beliefs here.

(09-24-2018, 12:16 AM)kingpill Wrote: My eyes starting to appear different to anyone elses eyes i have ever seen.

It looks dangerous, yet not dangerous.

Only people I can imagine these kinds of eyes are on lesbians. IDK why.

(09-23-2018, 09:55 PM)Ricardo Wrote:

(09-23-2018, 09:20 AM)Shannon Wrote:

(09-23-2018, 01:15 AM)Ricardo Wrote:

(09-20-2018, 03:43 AM)CatMan Wrote: [quote='Roy' pid='206029' dateline='1537441279']
[quote='CatMan' pid='206023' dateline='1537432675']


I also don't really have a dog in the fight in the end, as I'm still not convinced the program will end up executing as the sales page conceptualises for the majority. Just seems like way too much of a leap from where things are now, to widespread results as conceptualised. Hard for me to get on board with until I see strongly encouraging results in line with it. I think I'll need a pretty large turnaround in results to believe in it. Just speaking about the history of AS and what he has said about what it may be doing, is all, done now. No interest in protracted walls of text. Whatever Shannon ends up going for is what we will have. I'm fine with it. I am not nearly as women focused as I used to be long ago, so it is definitely more of a side pursuit now. I do not know if that is some IDGAF, or just a counter reaction to failing to get traction with women. Either way, my interest has definitely fallen a great deal over the last year+. Which is good, I was too 'thirsty ' anyway and that is known to be a big turnoff. I felt low self respect for chasing like that too, so I view this new attitude as an improvement, regardless.

I have to echo this. When I look round in my daily life and see guys who just wouldn't be able to attract a fly, I wonder how DMSI could possibly work for them. The design goals are too ambitious. If DMSI works it would change mankind forever and Shannon would probably end up with more money than Soros and Bezos put together!
I think it would be more pragmatic to go with 5.5/6G AYP's.

We already know DMSI "works". It just does not work as intended yet. If it didn't work, nobody would have achieved the design goals.

That rather pre-supposes that anyone who had sex while listening to the sub did so because of it. You don't seem to accept that it might have happened anyway for them. I'm not having a go but I sometimes feel that you are the one with limiting beliefs here.

(09-24-2018, 08:40 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote: Shannon, is the long range sniper in 3.2? Will it be in 3.3?

(09-24-2018, 10:43 AM)Have at ye Wrote:

(09-24-2018, 08:40 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote: Shannon, is the long range sniper in 3.2? Will it be in 3.3?

IIRC, it's disabled in 3.2, and probably won't make it into 3.3 due to the "return on investment" factor, energetically speaking. It used up a lot of energy for little effect.

(09-24-2018, 10:56 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote:

(09-24-2018, 10:43 AM)Have at ye Wrote:

(09-24-2018, 08:40 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote: Shannon, is the long range sniper in 3.2? Will it be in 3.3?

IIRC, it's disabled in 3.2, and probably won't make it into 3.3 due to the "return on investment" factor, energetically speaking. It used up a lot of energy for little effect.

I see.

And then how does the manifestation work then? I'm starting to wonder about my online "manifestations". If there's no LDS, then it's entirely possible DMSI was NOT responsible for my successes there since the first girl was DTF from the get go, and the second I used all the game I knew on her.

(09-24-2018, 10:59 AM)lano1106 Wrote:

(09-24-2018, 10:56 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote:

(09-24-2018, 10:43 AM)Have at ye Wrote:

(09-24-2018, 08:40 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote: Shannon, is the long range sniper in 3.2? Will it be in 3.3?

IIRC, it's disabled in 3.2, and probably won't make it into 3.3 due to the "return on investment" factor, energetically speaking. It used up a lot of energy for little effect.

I see.

And then how does the manifestation work then? I'm starting to wonder about my online "manifestations". If there's no LDS, then it's entirely possible DMSI was NOT responsible for my successes there since the first girl was DTF from the get go, and the second I used all the game I knew on her.

I wouldn't say DMSI is out of the window for online seduction. After all, you put into words your feelings when you communicate online. You can seduce a woman with words and those words come out of your mind.