![]() |
Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Volume-3) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Have at ye - 09-22-2018 (09-22-2018, 09:14 PM)Broski Wrote: Hey Shannon, I wouldn't necessarily expect a set "deadline" for the release of a program this complex. ![]() ![]() Also, the new LTU does indeed sound pretty swanky! Gonna start setting aside some potato for the purpose of procuring it once it's released. ![]() RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Kol - 09-23-2018 (09-22-2018, 03:07 PM)DarthXedonias Wrote:(09-22-2018, 01:09 PM)Shannon Wrote:(09-22-2018, 12:43 PM)Wharrgarbl Wrote: Shannon My last couple of days on my B run was like that. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Ricardo - 09-23-2018 (09-20-2018, 03:43 AM)CatMan Wrote: [quote='Roy' pid='206029' dateline='1537441279'] I have to echo this. When I look round in my daily life and see guys who just wouldn't be able to attract a fly, I wonder how DMSI could possibly work for them. The design goals are too ambitious. If DMSI works it would change mankind forever and Shannon would probably end up with more money than Soros and Bezos put together! I think it would be more pragmatic to go with 5.5/6G AYP's. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Jake2015 - 09-23-2018 @Shannon UM/OP seems to already be disrupting my sleep (wakes me usually within 1st loop of 3). If I want to listen to the sub instead when awake perhaps anytime from 10am - 6pm, will this be a big concern? It goes against your protocol but that I understand was to prevent sleep disruption which I seem to have gotten from my first cycle. thanks RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - findingme - 09-23-2018 Ben, I'm seeking your imput on something which has tagged itself onto my E2 ride these last 2 months. Women have been eyeing me heavily while on E2. Last night, on my way home from my friend's house, I stopped at a grocery store to pick something up. When I was about to leave, 2 young women walked in. It caught my attention since one had an infant carrier in her hand, and quickly looking, I assumed the second woman was her daughter. I caught eyes with the second, maybe a 7, who obviously was not her daughter, and we held looks. She was the same age, and......I wasn't ready for this. So, I looked away. It stuck with me since ......I was still slightly mad from my visit with the guys, but this has happened almost every single weekend. I've never found your E2 journal, but you've mentioned you got laid while on E2. I have just found it strange since E2 has such an inner focus. Well, I've kept everything inside most of my life. But these stares, to me, are attention getting. I got directly ogled by a woman standing next to her husband last week while grocery shopping. Her look said it all. She even followed me down another aisle. It's funny how an introvert (myself) is being pulled out of his shell by a healing subliminal. But was the attraction thing a constant for you while running E2? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Jake2015 - 09-23-2018 (09-23-2018, 03:15 AM)findingme Wrote: Ben, I'm seeking your imput on something which has tagged itself onto my E2 ride these last 2 months. Women have been eyeing me heavily while on E2. Last night, on my way home from my friend's house, I stopped at a grocery store to pick something up. When I was about to leave, 2 young women walked in. It caught my attention since one had an infant carrier in her hand, and quickly looking, I assumed the second woman was her daughter. I caught eyes with the second, maybe a 7, who obviously was not her daughter, and we held looks. She was the same age, and......I wasn't ready for this. So, I looked away. It stuck with me since ......I was still slightly mad from my visit with the guys, but this has happened almost every single weekend. Im not Ben, but hope you dont mind me adding my thoughts on this and those are that perhaps E2 is clearing your inner garbage which was holding you back naturally, or rather concealing your true aura and inner attractive qualities and thus now youre basically a DMSI. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - findingme - 09-23-2018 (09-23-2018, 03:18 AM)Jake2015 Wrote:(09-23-2018, 03:15 AM)findingme Wrote: Ben, I'm seeking your imput on something which has tagged itself onto my E2 ride these last 2 months. Women have been eyeing me heavily while on E2. Last night, on my way home from my friend's house, I stopped at a grocery store to pick something up. When I was about to leave, 2 young women walked in. It caught my attention since one had an infant carrier in her hand, and quickly looking, I assumed the second woman was her daughter. I caught eyes with the second, maybe a 7, who obviously was not her daughter, and we held looks. She was the same age, and......I wasn't ready for this. So, I looked away. It stuck with me since ......I was still slightly mad from my visit with the guys, but this has happened almost every single weekend. That's possible. Very possible. I'd just not looked for it. When I was on DMSI, it quickly made me enforce boundaries with toxic women in my life, my mom mostly. Having boundaries helped me feel more in control of the situations, and I realize I've avoided boundaries often with women. I thought "if I say no to things, they won't like me". DMSI ran right over that wishy-washyness and I almost disowned my mom for 2 months. I avoided all calls and texts from her. DMSI was an awakening experience, and boundaries are feeling needed in my life again. E2 is subtle though, pissing me off gradually, making me sit in my poo, until I'm like "this has to change!". I'll admit though that DMSI gave me some gonads for a while ![]() RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Determined - 09-23-2018 If US/LM is in the new LTU 5.5G, would it be reasonable for customers of US/LM to receive a discount when purchasing LTU? Otherwise we'd just be paying for the same thing twice. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Jake2015 - 09-23-2018 (09-23-2018, 04:56 AM)Determined Wrote: If US/LM is in the new LTU 5.5G, would it be reasonable for customers of US/LM to receive a discount when purchasing LTU? I 2nd this and ask for those of us on UM/OP, if its indeed possible for the same too? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Darwinn - 09-23-2018 Hi Shannon, it was great to read what’s intended for LTU. Just to reiterate, the cognitive enhancements from MLS are really useful. Overcoming resistance, working harder, learning the tools for development are all much harder when your brain is just not functioning/you’re a little too dumb to let unconscious instruction be executed. Also if LTU is much more expensive it would be good to know whether there will be any discount for those who used the old LTU. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Williamx25 - 09-23-2018 (09-20-2018, 01:53 PM)Hatman Wrote:(09-20-2018, 01:06 PM)Williamx25 Wrote:(09-19-2018, 04:59 AM)Shannon Wrote:(09-18-2018, 09:41 AM)Williamx25 Wrote: @Shannon @Shannon I get this when running the WinMD5 application: ![]() What should I do? Something isn' right, but I downloaded straight from the links on your webshop, I don't get it. Do I need to download everything again? How do I fix this? Also I ran 2 days of this broken file, is this a problem? Should I take some days off? Yesterday was a listening day but I didn't listen to the files because there's something wrong. How do I proceed? Do I have to take days off? Anyone please chime in. ![]() RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Have at ye - 09-23-2018 (09-23-2018, 05:38 AM)Williamx25 Wrote:(09-20-2018, 01:53 PM)Hatman Wrote:(09-20-2018, 01:06 PM)Williamx25 Wrote:(09-19-2018, 04:59 AM)Shannon Wrote:(09-18-2018, 09:41 AM)Williamx25 Wrote: @Shannon EDIT Don't mind me, follow the advice in the post below. ![]() RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Raz - 09-23-2018 (09-23-2018, 05:38 AM)Williamx25 Wrote: What should I do? You made a simple mistake using the software. Do you see the field which says "paste its original md5 value to verify"? In there you put the value - from inside the hashes textfile you downloaded together with the other files - which is listed next to the filename of the sub you checked. Your hash value matches the original one by the way. So there is no need to worry. Quote:8d97880cdc509385254bed54ada6d94f Maximum_Learning_Speed_5_5G_Hybrid_Subliminal_(Ocean_Surf_Ultrasonic).flac RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shawn - 09-23-2018 (09-23-2018, 05:38 AM)Williamx25 Wrote: @Shannon Your filename doesn't match. Instead of bracets you have got %28 and %29 in the filename. This is because of different charset. If you replace %28 with "(" and %29 with ")" your MD5 should match again, as filenames are part of the whole MD5 sum. If it then still doesn't match then the files are broken. |