![]() |
Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Thread-Vol-5) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 12-02-2020 (12-02-2020, 12:27 AM)Kol Wrote: Hell yeah I want to be in. @Shannon does this mean this installment of OF 5.75.5G will be in the upcoming DMSI release? Also, am I correct to say that, as fear is root of it all, that OF/FRM is the key to FRM 5.0? Allow me to clarify how I'm doing this. Fear Removal Module 4.9 is the module that is being used as the Key Script for Overcoming Fear. That means the FRM is the goal of the program, and the rest of the skeleton script supports that goal. But in other programs, the FRM is not the Key Script. It is part of the Skeleton Script, which is what supports the Key Script. So FRM is the key to OF, and the key to FRM 5.0 is something I haven't figured out yet. Basically I'm not yet sure how to advance FRM 4.9 to 5.0, but I have identified some things that will enable the skeleton script to better support the FRM, thus allowing for better execution of FRM 4.9 without changing it's script. It would be about like tuning a race car by improving all the components without upgrading the engine. I'm not a car guy, but let's say we improve airflow to the engine, and we make the cooling better and we improve the efficiency of the engine by tweaking the timing, and we tweak the gear ratios, adjust the tire pressure, use better oil, add nitro and perhaps new spark plugs. The same engine is now going to put out more power and perform better than before. That's sort of like what I am able to do right now by using FRM 4.9 in a newer, more advanced and better focused, tweaked and tuned skeleton script. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - tolgaocal80 - 12-02-2020 hi Shannon,if you have time could you please share your opinion about this https://subliminal-talk.com/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Thread-Vol-5?pid=240814#pid240814 I need your thoughts, guidance, if I had success with AM which one I should contuine with SM or WM? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Jake2015 - 12-02-2020 (11-28-2020, 07:32 PM)fab10 Wrote:Hey Fab10 sorry for the late reply. Sadly it HAS to be mobile as I fly in and out of 2 countries as im a student abroad therefore I need to use what I can rely on irrespective of where I am in the world.Quote:If this fails me then I have no other means to play the sub sadly so it has to work on my s10 phone irrespective of what the speaker test reveals.Cannot you hook either phone to a set of computer speakers? They start at 15 bucks or so. Or does it need to be mobile? Also Shannon gave me a particular instruction which was to use volume of 13/15 from my phone, so adding a speaker will just add more to that. I dont want to run masked as im sure ill end up awake instead of able to sleep sadly. I need to sleep and forget about the subliminal. I have tried sleepphones in the past and due to the way my ears are shaped they were resulting in soreness that was simply uncomfortable so I couldnt ever use that option sadly. So mobile phone that I have has to be it for now. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 12-03-2020 (12-01-2020, 01:21 PM)tolgaocal80 Wrote: hi Shannon, I have a question about buying SM or WM If you want to turn your results into sexual results, then it would be Sex Magnet, which is why that program was created. But it's raw sex, and a lot of guys report being shocked when the women they got to respond turned the tables on them and treated them like fuck meat. Don't be surprised if that happens. It won't be a relationship. It won't be bonding, or romance, or friendship. It will be raw sex and sexuality when it happens. If that's what you want, then go for SM. If not, something else may be in order. WM is more about social and playful alpha. It takes more skill and experience to turn it sexual. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - tolgaocal80 - 12-03-2020 (12-03-2020, 09:54 AM)Shannon Wrote: But it's raw sex, and a lot of guys report being shocked when the women they got to respond turned the tables on them and treated them like fuck meat. Don't be surprised if that happens. It won't be a relationship. It won't be bonding, or romance, or friendship. It will be raw sex and sexuality when it happens. If that's what you want, then go for SM.Actually that doesn't break my heart, ![]() thats exactly what I want no strings attached sex, thank you sir. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - dissonance - 12-03-2020 Hey Shannon and everyone. Hope all's good. I been out of the game for a while. Just noticed there's a new LTU 6.0! I purchased LTU 5.0 when it came out, and wondering is there a discount for the upgrade from 5 to 6? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 12-03-2020 (12-03-2020, 01:33 PM)dissonance Wrote: Hey Shannon and everyone. Hope all's good. I been out of the game for a while. Just noticed there's a new LTU 6.0! I purchased LTU 5.0 when it came out, and wondering is there a discount for the upgrade from 5 to 6? Our policy is that if the new version is in a new technology generation, there is no discount unless there was a discount specified at the publication of the original version. That did not happen in this case, and we have advanced to a new technology generation, so no discount. However, if you think about it, the price right now is the introductory price, which is significantly lower than the end price will be, and the price is being held where it is because people are having more difficulty because of the corona virus. Given what the end price will be, you effectively have a bigger "discount" this way than you would even if I was offering a 50% discount to upgrade. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - dissonance - 12-03-2020 Ah okay thanks. How many minutes are each of the LTU6 loops? Just to gauge how long a day's set would take. Also, if I'm using the masked version, the mp3 vs flac would make no difference since the sub content would be below the freqs that mp3 would cut off, right? Finally, when using the masked version, how would you describe how soft it can go while remaining fully effective, while sleeping? I'm using on speakers about 1.5 ft - 2 ft away from head. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - fab10 - 12-03-2020 Quote:How many minutes are each of the LTU6 loops?That has been different for each stage - between 60 and 75 minutes approximately. However, the number of required loops also changes, resulting in a total daily listening time between a minimum of 6 hours and a maximum of 9 hours and 20 minutes, so far. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 12-03-2020 (12-03-2020, 03:46 PM)dissonance Wrote: Ah okay thanks. How many minutes are each of the LTU6 loops? Just to gauge how long a day's set would take. As stated above, each stage has a different ASRB and thus a different length, as well as a different number of loops per day. You can find that information on the description page. Quote:Also, if I'm using the masked version, the mp3 vs flac would make no difference since the sub content would be below the freqs that mp3 would cut off, right? MP3 is lossy; FLAC is not. The difference has nothing to do with frequencies in this case, or I would have to use only FLAC. The difference is in the amount of fidelity and thus clarity of the resulting subliminal, and that will still be degraded an estimated 3% to 7% on MP3, compared to 100% fidelity/clarity on FLAC. Quote:Finally, when using the masked version, how would you describe how soft it can go while remaining fully effective, while sleeping? I'm using on speakers about 1.5 ft - 2 ft away from head. That gets into a lot of variables, especially if you're using speakers. What is playing it, how many volume controls exist for the whole play chain, what are they, how well does the supporting software and hardware function, are there any background controls influencing replay fidelity, and so forth. If you can hear the mask, you should be affected by the program, but I suggest keeping it at a moderate level of volume for the mask, at least. Whatever would be comfortable to use while you're awake will probably be best. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - AriGold - 12-03-2020 Which program would you suggest against perfectionistic behaviour? OF, E4, what else? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - dissonance - 12-03-2020 (12-03-2020, 01:39 PM)Shannon Wrote:(12-03-2020, 01:33 PM)dissonance Wrote: Hey Shannon and everyone. Hope all's good. I been out of the game for a while. Just noticed there's a new LTU 6.0! I purchased LTU 5.0 when it came out, and wondering is there a discount for the upgrade from 5 to 6? (12-03-2020, 09:26 PM)Shannon Wrote:(12-03-2020, 03:46 PM)dissonance Wrote: Ah okay thanks. How many minutes are each of the LTU6 loops? Just to gauge how long a day's set would take. Thanks!! gonna be goin at it hard with OF 5.75 startin tonight. Removing that fear vibration for GOOD!! RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 12-04-2020 (12-03-2020, 10:19 PM)AriGold Wrote: Which program would you suggest against perfectionistic behaviour? Perfectionism is almost 100% fear based, in my opinion. OF is pretty much #1 by a long shot. E4 would be a #2. A #3 would be LTU v6. Aside from that, not much else worth considering. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Jake2015 - 12-04-2020 Hi @Shannon ill be quick. Im considering trying out masked for OF, rather the current US incase my phones preventing it from working effectively. You gave me specific instructions to listen at a volume of 13/15 through my phone, does that still apply if I use masked? Masked is gentler than hybrid correct and thus I thought the better option to try, yes? thank you |