+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - heavysm - 05-29-2016
Shannon, question about EPRHA 2.0...
For this aspect of the script:
"Projection of part of the awareness into the future in which the goals have been safely and successfully achieved, and then pulling the “now” self to that future through the connection."
Does that only apply to the goal of healing, or any goal we intend to manifest?
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - dweller94 - 05-29-2016
(05-29-2016, 03:57 PM)heavysm Wrote: Shannon, question about EPRHA 2.0...
For this aspect of the script:
"Projection of part of the awareness into the future in which the goals have been safely and successfully achieved, and then pulling the “now” self to that future through the connection."
Does that only apply to the goal of healing, or any goal we intend to manifest?
I would say it's the goals of the sub related to healing.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - AbundanceCH - 05-29-2016
Let's keep it simple. It should be powerful enough to get all the forum posters here get laid that haven't been able to get laid under the other subliminals.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Catman - 05-29-2016
"BAMM works TOO well, it makes you a billionaire. I need to scale it back, it's too powerful."
I'm just trolling Shannon, lmao!
Hey...Shannon...put down the banhammer...hey...HEY...COME ON, TAKE IT EASY...you...you wouldn't ban a guy who wears glasses, would you?!!?! WOODJAH?! Look at my avi!
LMAO.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Benjamin - 05-29-2016
Does the hammer need to be reinforced in 5.5g steel to deal with people wearing glasses?
We all know the glasses aren't for the sun, it's just to check out girls bums.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Catman - 05-29-2016
(05-29-2016, 05:20 PM)Benjamin Wrote: it's just to check out girls bums.
On the advice of counsel, I decline to answer, on the grounds that my answer may tend to incriminate me.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-29-2016
(05-28-2016, 11:10 PM)kenpachi Wrote: Are any of the results designed to be permanent? Or when you stop using will the aura gradually fade until you're back to baseline?
Generally an aura based sub is aimed at being effective while it is being run. The reason for this is the amount of energy required to produce this sort of effect. It would conflict with achieving maximum success with other subliminals you may run in the future if I tried to make it permanent.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-29-2016
(05-28-2016, 11:11 PM)ALI6NMENT Wrote: Shannon is the full script from BIATBWS going into this sub? Other then the unwanted attention.
I used BIATBW, but I never realized that BIATWS's script was sooooo much better!
I love the use of
"I am absolutely irresistibly attractive sexually, at all levels of my mind, body and emotions, and in all ways, to beautiful women."
"which attracts the most beautiful women to me physically, mentally, emotionally and sexually."
That really makes feel that I'll become sexually attractive at core levels, not just top surface level.
As I have been rejected in the past because of my mindset, beliefs, interests etc... even though they where attracted to me on top surface levels, IOW (My looks)
I would get sex multiple times, then they would go off me because I am spiritual and eccentric and do not see reality the same way average people do.
With women that are compatible with me on more then surface levels I sometimes feel like I am looking for a needle in a haystack.
But I think the becoming irresistibly sexually attractive on all levels and in all ways of mind, body, emotions and physically, mentally, emotionally will help alot!
Especially women being attracted to me on all them levels too.
Yes, the full script of both AOS and BIATBWS is in AOSI.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-29-2016
(05-29-2016, 05:53 AM)Kurohawk Wrote: Personally i would not complain if AOSI ends up too effective since im jacked and 6ft and people always think im about to start a fight but truth is im (was) your average introverted guy.
I can see how too much power might cause an issue considering hundreds of people running it something dangerious is bound to happen to one or tow of them.
And am all in for less power to be honest i don't to end up in a situation where 2 girls who are best friends like me and i like the hot one of them, while the ugly one will just get in our way.
This might sound funny but i've had this issue in 3 different occasions.
It's not necessarily a matter of "too poweful"; too effective may mean too effective in a way that unbalances the results in a negative way, and it may also mean that it works so well that people around the respondents become threatened by the effect and kick your ass. I don't spend time looking for what it means; I just avoid any possible negative result.
The power level isn't really being reduced, it's just being focused more accurately to achieve the results I want in a positive way. I'm taking it to the edge of the red line regardless of what I have to avoid, but I need it focused to produce a positive result in the models.
If you have 2 girls who are friends interested, call out the pink elephant in the room like this, and let the chips fall where they may:
"Ladies, I know you're both interested. The only fair way to handle this is all or nothing. So either we're all getting some, or nothing happens. You decide amongst yourselves; I am going over here to do ________."
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-29-2016
(05-29-2016, 10:06 AM)Sky_Wolf Wrote: @Shannon
On PT people keep going on about your frags and that you are selling them, or used too, through this forum.
Is this true or just misinformation?
I am currently in the process of designing and creating a set of fragrances for an initial line that we will be offering to the public when that line is finished and at a quality level that meets my demands and which Andrew feels comfortable with also. Neither of us is easy to please, but we are partners, so we are going to be doubly picky when it comes to what fragrances we offer.
We haven't started selling them yet; although I do have a dedicated clientele for a couple of my fragrances, who started off as testers and then became addicted to how good it smelled, or the responses it got them or both. Currently that list includes one fragrance for men, and one for women.
Developing fragrances to my standards of excellence is a challenging and slow process. I'm currently working on one called Paradise that is tropical, unisex and sexy, and one that's designed to be fresh, masculine and classy. I'm also working on a more masculinized version of the fragrance for men that has a dedicated clientele, and making it even more erotic.
When we have something we can offer you, trust me, I won't be hiding it.
However, please be aware that we are only going to be making very small batches of each fragrance each year, and therefore each batch becomes a very limited supply. We do this because we don't want everyone smelling the same, which maintains the value of the fragrance for those who choose to wear it. We also do this because it allows us a lot more precision and control of the quality we can achieve in making each batch. Currently, my plan is that each fragrance is only batched once per year, and when that year's batch is gone... well, it's gone until the next year.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-29-2016
(05-29-2016, 03:57 PM)heavysm Wrote: Shannon, question about EPRHA 2.0...
For this aspect of the script:
"Projection of part of the awareness into the future in which the goals have been safely and successfully achieved, and then pulling the “now” self to that future through the connection."
Does that only apply to the goal of healing, or any goal we intend to manifest?
Why would it apply to anything but the goals of the program?
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-29-2016
(05-29-2016, 05:13 PM)CatMan Wrote: "BAMM works TOO well, it makes you a billionaire. I need to scale it back, it's too powerful."
I'm just trolling Shannon, lmao!
Hey...Shannon...put down the banhammer...hey...HEY...COME ON, TAKE IT EASY...you...you wouldn't ban a guy who wears glasses, would you?!!?! WOODJAH?! Look at my avi!
LMAO.
Funny.
But as I said before, it's not "too powerful" I am worried about. It's too effective. As in, it is too effective in a way that produces a negative outcome. I just don't want a negative outcome. Power can be maintained, I just need to refocus the script in a way that produces a positive outcome.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - heavysm - 05-29-2016
(05-29-2016, 06:27 PM)Shannon Wrote: Why would it apply to anything but the goals of the program?
I misworded the question. I have an ideal image of how I would be when fully healed, both emotionally and physically. I'm wondering if that particular part of the script pulls me closer to my ideal healed version of myself, or some other healed version of me as constructed through the sub.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-29-2016
It pulls you closer to the ideal outcome, but not what you consciously consider ideal. The subconscious is much more "in the know" on this, and it is what decides what ideal is for you.