![]() |
Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Volume-3) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - brightike - 07-25-2018 (07-23-2018, 08:04 PM)Leo1990 Wrote: Am I the only one who thinks dmsi might be loaded down with too much stuff? I thought OE was supposed to take care of #2 @Jake2015 It was about a week ago that Shannon said that people can take any focusfire and turn it into a multistage or something to that effect. I'm wholeheartedly with you. The list of effects is phenomenal as it is in DMSI 3.2 and people can't execute. If you have ever built anything before you start with a base. Perfect that base and add to that. It's wild that Shannon has tech that can go back and perfect the base while still building the main structure, but I can't help but think that if the base was perfected the structure on top would be easier to build. I do mean that if the orginal x amount of goals had been taken to the place where 75-95% of the population executed then it would be a lot easier to add new modules. Instead it seem like 20-30 modules are added every time to catch the outliers or to get more effects built. It seems pretty simple.. you hot (aura), you try (approach or talk when they are near), you persist (keep learning until you do), don't give up (don't switch subs) @Shannon I understand I am being ridiculously simplistic and I am also aware that I understand nothing about the sub building process. If I offend, forgive me. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - jesseb - 07-25-2018 (03-12-2018, 01:24 PM)Shannon Wrote: Thanks, man. Weelcome back, everybody. Good Morning Everyone, Today is day 23 and I do notice a positive outlook and a genuine happiness, i'm actually more excited to get to stage 2 and hoping to get some big results and yes i'm tempering my expectations. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - hsindermann - 07-25-2018 Quote:I will be moving on to one of the following when I recover from testing it, hopefully later today: My vote goes to UM/OP for what that's worth ![]() RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Griffin - 07-25-2018 (07-25-2018, 08:16 AM)hsindermann Wrote:Quote:I will be moving on to one of the following when I recover from testing it, hopefully later today: +1, I would love to run that RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - THolt - 07-25-2018 I vote for both. ![]() RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Jake2015 - 07-25-2018 (07-23-2018, 08:04 PM)Leo1990 Wrote: Am I the only one who thinks dmsi might be loaded down with too much stuff? I thought OE was supposed to take care of #2 @Jake2015 @Leo1990 hey Leo1990, no idea if thats what OE does tbh. would be good to know. Regarding if DMSI is loaded down, I personally dont think so because im 100% sure @Shannon knows what he's doing and has only put in those things he knows works or is currently testing. If he didnt want it in there it wouldnt be in there. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Jake2015 - 07-25-2018 (07-25-2018, 09:06 AM)Griffin Wrote:(07-25-2018, 08:16 AM)hsindermann Wrote:Quote:I will be moving on to one of the following when I recover from testing it, hopefully later today: If they can be combined then awesome, otherwise my vote is on UM/OP So +1 here too! RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Griffin - 07-25-2018 (07-25-2018, 11:32 AM)Jake2015 Wrote:(07-25-2018, 09:06 AM)Griffin Wrote:(07-25-2018, 08:16 AM)hsindermann Wrote:Quote:I will be moving on to one of the following when I recover from testing it, hopefully later today: if they can be combined that would be mind blowing... i hope the models proof positive! RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Jake2015 - 07-25-2018 (07-25-2018, 11:39 AM)Griffin Wrote:(07-25-2018, 11:32 AM)Jake2015 Wrote:(07-25-2018, 09:06 AM)Griffin Wrote:(07-25-2018, 08:16 AM)hsindermann Wrote:Quote:I will be moving on to one of the following when I recover from testing it, hopefully later today: fingers crossed!! the next wish is that I and other who dont execute actually execute!!! lol RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Jake2015 - 07-25-2018 @Shannon Ill try and make this quick buddy! As you may recall, i have had no effects since I increased 3.2 6-7 loops via phone. My conclusion: either increasing loops fails me or listening now from a phone fails me. When I was listening to 1 loop via earphones I had almost immediate effects. eg: no fap for 56 days. Im on day 19 of 6-7 loops and had to listen to 1 loop yesterday which I did with earphones. I woke knowing I had dreams - nothing sexual but had girls in there, 1-2 that I have liked in the past 6months & then all day I had an urge to masturbate and then I did and it was wonderful! shall I go back to 1 loop a day with earphones my friend? and if you do go on to make UM/OP focusfire do you think I have a chance of executing that or shall i continue on the DMSI road until we reach a point where I am truly executing finally? thank you very much!! RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Benjamin - 07-25-2018 Ultra Success is likely to win for me over DMSI at the moment. DMSI is 'it would be nice to use, and might help in other areas though it's not focused on that' which is why I haven't gone back. The other thing honestly is the amount of more positive responses and respect I got on DMSI and how I was depressed and felt ignored after stopping it with the difference in attention, and to keep that up i'd have to use DMSI all the time. US would focus on money and other things that i've been working on using other tools. I had thought of using SE, but the thought of it didn't really get me excited. The thought of using US 5.5g does. I'm a bit confused about whether to use US or UM/OP because part of my problem is motivation in some areas. The second 2 things go along with my issues with success, so i'd have thought US would also deal with it. What would the difference be? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Leo1990 - 07-25-2018 All I think about is "less is more". We can always add more once results start to show. It's weird that one run had results, but anything more (and after the first week) stopped working. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Ryu - 07-25-2018 Ultra success sounds mind-blowing I vote for US first. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - ncbeareatingman - 07-26-2018 Not as relavent ,for what is asked for on the vote thing- I'd just love to see a long ass,brilliant version of Ultra Success with all kindsa new and ass kickin bells and whistles in it ,like DMSI has,only, of course DIRECTED at the Success goals at hand. worth the wait to me,hell ,waited this long for such and similar. thats my 5 bucks and Im stickin' to it. focus fire UM/OP sounds like some "deep effect" sheet man. really does! a semi-focus-fire or sorts. Keith. |