+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Thread-Vol-5)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 09-14-2020
(09-12-2020, 09:36 PM)Rusty Wrote: Will E4 contain FRM 4.9? and if so, is the script will be also better improved then E3 script?
I plan on buyingAM6 after this, so if it remove fears i think it should make AM program more powerful
More than likely, yes. However, I still have to see what the models tell me.
The script of E4 is improved over the script of E3 regardless of FRM inclusion.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 09-14-2020
(09-13-2020, 11:44 AM)KingDavid93 Wrote: @Shannon
The last couple of days on LTU6 I have been feeling very conflicted (best way of putting it)- I wake up not knowing what I should be doing or where I should be going- it’s a very weird feeling
Is this what deep internal change feels like?
It can be. It can also be what happens when two or more parts of you disagree on how to accomplish a goal. Most likely what is happening is that the program is making deep internal changes that are causing the part(s) of you that were previously directing the outcome to disagree with the parts of you that are executing the script, and this disagreement is strong. The fact that you experience it at all means the program is having a powerful effect and is making changes, which strongly implies that it will in the end win out over the part(s) of you that want to maintain the status quo.
Quote:And when I feel like this should I take a break until things even out or blast ltu6 until I feel normal again or better than normal?
I suggest that you should use LTUv6 until the conflict is resolved.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 09-14-2020
(09-13-2020, 02:41 PM)apollolux Wrote: Hm, I'm not sure how to feel about the conjecture about what's actually changing in DMSI. I just want DMSI to be useful and ultimately do the opposite of the stuff it did poorly. I did not listen to DMSI for years expecting the outcome to be women trying to use me for their own selfish purposes and claiming to love me as a manipulation tactic, promising sex only to leave me hanging, and I certainly did not listen to it for years expecting the belief that women would only be sexually attracted to me if I had money to be strengthened. Fix both of those.
The first point is, you may need to change your exctations. DMSI is designed to cause you to develop maximum sexual irresistibility. The result of that is that those you attract will want to have sex with you. Depending on various peripheral factors, they may wish to just have sex with you, including using you to satisfy the sexual urges you are triggering in them. That is, in fact, a perfectly valid successful response.
Claiming to love you as a manipulation tactic to get you to have sex with them is another successful response, although we don't want that, but if they did it to achieve sex with you in order to satisfy their sexual attraction and urges caused by the program, then it's a successful result of DMSI.
Promising sex only to leave you hanging isn't DMSI, it's them. They are internally conflicted, and choosing to be influenced by fear (or maybe wisdom, if they know something you don't) instead of desire. This can also result from displaying signs of desperation on your part. Again, not DMSI.
The belief that women would only be attracted to you if you had money strengthening is also not DMSI. That is your choice based on your interpretation of your observation of results, as a result of using an experimental program in a constant state of flux as I figure out how to push the right buttons and what those buttons are. Your interpretations of, and the resultant choice of beliefs resulting from, your experiences is not my responsibility or that of DMSI.
As far as I can see, the only valid point we have here is that they tried to manipulate you to achieve sex.
Which version(s) did this happen with?
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - THolt - 09-14-2020
(09-14-2020, 09:13 AM)Shannon Wrote:(09-12-2020, 09:36 PM)Rusty Wrote: Will E4 contain FRM 4.9? and if so, is the script will be also better improved then E3 script?
I plan on buyingAM6 after this, so if it remove fears i think it should make AM program more powerful
More than likely, yes. However, I still have to see what the models tell me.
The script of E4 is improved over the script of E3 regardless of FRM inclusion.
@Shannon
Just to clarify, will E4 and the other extraction programs have the third breakthrough you spoke of in your LTU6 journal?
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - hsindermann - 09-14-2020
@Shannon
Just to be sure that it is not a mistake: LTU6 stage 2 has no breaks in the subliminal input at all ( I think that's the primary ASRB), so it is 6 hours of input straight. Is that on purpose?
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 09-14-2020
(09-14-2020, 10:24 AM)THolt Wrote:(09-14-2020, 09:13 AM)Shannon Wrote:(09-12-2020, 09:36 PM)Rusty Wrote: Will E4 contain FRM 4.9? and if so, is the script will be also better improved then E3 script?
I plan on buyingAM6 after this, so if it remove fears i think it should make AM program more powerful
More than likely, yes. However, I still have to see what the models tell me.
The script of E4 is improved over the script of E3 regardless of FRM inclusion.
@Shannon
Just to clarify, will E4 and the other extraction programs have the third breakthrough you spoke of in your LTU6 journal?
Yes.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 09-14-2020
(09-14-2020, 10:53 AM)hsindermann Wrote: @Shannon
Just to be sure that it is not a mistake: LTU6 stage 2 has no breaks in the subliminal input at all ( I think that's the primary ASRB), so it is 6 hours of input straight. Is that on purpose?
Correct. It is what came out of the models as being the best choice for the best results.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - THolt - 09-14-2020
(09-14-2020, 08:16 PM)Shannon Wrote:(09-14-2020, 10:24 AM)THolt Wrote:(09-14-2020, 09:13 AM)Shannon Wrote:(09-12-2020, 09:36 PM)Rusty Wrote: Will E4 contain FRM 4.9? and if so, is the script will be also better improved then E3 script?
I plan on buyingAM6 after this, so if it remove fears i think it should make AM program more powerful
More than likely, yes. However, I still have to see what the models tell me.
The script of E4 is improved over the script of E3 regardless of FRM inclusion.
@Shannon
Just to clarify, will E4 and the other extraction programs have the third breakthrough you spoke of in your LTU6 journal?
Yes.
Awesome.
Can’t wait to run it
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Broski - 09-14-2020
Hey Shannon,
Any rough ETA on DMSI 3.3.3 becoming available?
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - samba99 - 09-14-2020
(09-14-2020, 08:40 PM)Broski Wrote: Hey Shannon,
Any rough ETA on DMSI 3.3.3 becoming available?
He probably can't accurately say so. Maybe the question should be.
How far are you in DMSI at the moment Shannon? We know you have been working on it in round robin for a while before actually having the full time for it.
At what stage are you in? Did you achieve any of the major tasks?
Still upgrading the script to latest tech?
How are things looking so far (theoretically speaking)
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Bignoise - 09-15-2020
(09-14-2020, 11:19 PM)samba99 Wrote:Robinhood(09-14-2020, 08:40 PM)Broski Wrote: Hey Shannon,
Any rough ETA on DMSI 3.3.3 becoming available?
He probably can't accurately say so. Maybe the question should be.
How far are you in DMSI at the moment Shannon? We know you have been working on it in robinhood for a while before actually having the full time for it.
At what stage are you in? Still upgrading the script to latest tech? How are things looking so far (theoretically speaking)
I think you mean this: Round Robin
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Have at ye - 09-15-2020
(09-14-2020, 09:25 AM)Shannon Wrote: Promising sex only to leave you hanging isn't DMSI, it's them. They are internally conflicted, and choosing to be influenced by fear (or maybe wisdom, if they know something you don't)
The new DMSI release is definitely coming sooner rather than later, seeing as the usual DMSI-related doubts and such are beginning to pop up in this here journal discussion. This could be TID!
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 09-15-2020
(09-14-2020, 08:40 PM)Broski Wrote: Hey Shannon,
Any rough ETA on DMSI 3.3.3 becoming available?
When it's ready. This must necessarily be my standard answer to this question from now on. Remember it.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 09-15-2020
(09-14-2020, 11:19 PM)samba99 Wrote:(09-14-2020, 08:40 PM)Broski Wrote: Hey Shannon,
Any rough ETA on DMSI 3.3.3 becoming available?
He probably can't accurately say so. Maybe the question should be.
How far are you in DMSI at the moment Shannon? We know you have been working on it in round robin for a while before actually having the full time for it.
Relative to the whole job, not very far yet.
Quote:At what stage are you in?
Grammar police are on their way! Better run! lol
I'm currently developing a specific module that will guide the whole program in important ways, which is going to have to be as close to perfect as possible, and thus will take a disproportionate amount of time to develop.
Quote:Did you achieve any of the major tasks?
The first one is about half way finished.
Quote:Still upgrading the script to latest tech?
Some upgrades are finished, some have yet to be implemented.
Quote:How are things looking so far (theoretically speaking)
It looks good, but it's far from finished.