Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - SargeMaximus - 05-26-2016 (05-26-2016, 09:13 AM)Nox Wrote:(05-26-2016, 08:55 AM)SouthPaw Wrote: Alpha, when I was on AOS I had guys unconsciously staring at my dick and unconsciously touching there's. And as far as I knew they were full hetero. WTF is that? Lol. Don't give me the fear thing again. A day doesn't just consist of going to the club. And like I said it's 5.5G, meaning it's much much more powerful. So yeah safeties please. This reminds me of a story: I was in the shower late one night (had just got home) and was feeling relaxed and really good. When I got out of the shower, I went straight to my room and the lights were off in the living room. Anyhow, as I walked to my room I groped and grabbed my dick, just feeling sexy I guess. Not masturbating, just grabbing with pride I guess. Anyhow, when I got in my room and closed the door, I noticed my brother had been standing there the whole time lol. The next day he was giving me massive respect, hard to say if it was a coincidence. Anyhow, loose is EXACTLY what we need Southpaw. People pick up on your energy and attempt to match it. So if you're feeling sexy and loose, the women will too. If guys come onto you, well, that's where boundaries come in. Pretty simple if you ask me. Another fun fact: I used to be super afraid of being gay myself, then I realized I was bi, it freed me up so much, now I don't even look at guys and have become even more obsessed with women. Whatever you resist, persists. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - CatMan - 05-26-2016 (05-26-2016, 02:00 AM)Shannon Wrote: So what you're saying is, turn it into AM and SM? That's what this list reads like. Makes me think you should do E2, then an AM refresher and then SM again. Hi Shannon! I just wanted to mention things women seem to find sexy is all. Some were direct and could be of use, others did that in an indirect way, that I thought would shore up the more direct parts so it worked as intended. Like I said, I wasn't even sure how some of that would be possible, just a "perfect world" scenario. I saw you were adding GSF elements to make sure the program works as intended it seemed, and thought you wanted more direct AND indirect ways to be sexy for the script. I appreciate the honesty about running E2 then AM6 refresher and a full redo of SM3, that would be amazing and would save me money. I just have very little faith in SM3 now, after how awful and disappointing that first run was. It shook my belief in subs so harshly, that...well...I won't talk about it publicly, but I'm sure you know what I'm referring to. Not having a single redeeming moment with a single girl to be optimistic about, I'm not convinced a second run would be any better for me. Even ONE lone incident, would let me know it was actually working and would be enough to keep me going with it and positive about it, but it didn't happen. After every night out, and nothing being different, I always felt like a failure for not making such a powerful program work, it made me feel apprehensive about going out at times as I'd be worried I'd again feel like a failure afterwards. It's too much time investment, in a program that I'm now very skeptical will work for me. I'm concerned about wasting all that time again. I'm hoping this program will do something for me, so I can move on from thinking about SM3. I'm very happy to go in another direction with something vastly more powerful. Nobody was more excited for SM3 than I when I got to finally run it, that was the program goals I've wanted my whole life, but the results were shockingly bad for me. So bad that I don't think it's able to work on me, maybe. I guess no program can work for everyone. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - dissonance - 05-26-2016 (05-26-2016, 11:44 AM)terry44 Wrote:(05-26-2016, 09:12 AM)dissonance Wrote:(05-26-2016, 07:57 AM)terry44 Wrote:(05-26-2016, 07:43 AM)Alpha360 Wrote:(05-26-2016, 07:31 AM)terry44 Wrote: With respect I disagree with him then. The fear that stops you walking off the edge of a cliff, or stepping into traffic or putting your hand in a fire are very healthy. Millions of years of evolution created fear to avoid danger, it stopped you fighting a sabre-toothed tiger or a much bigger human adversary. Or, if you had to fight, fear made you produce the adrenaline and other hormones to be able to fight effectively. Trouble is, it can feed on itself and become irrational, inappropriate, or excessive, and inappropriate fear can even be transmitted to you when very young by those around you.It may take 1000 years before the general population realize what Shannon just explained in this post. Fear is not useful anymore if you are able to think for yourself and avoid danger by being smart. Fear is useful for animals because they can't think for themselves. I know they are related but they aren't one in the same is what I mean. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - K-Train - 05-26-2016 For whatever it's worth, adrenaline can be fueled not just by fear but also by positive stress or eustress. Think of it like this: if you love roller coasters and you come upon a new 300ft behemoth coaster that goes 90mph your blood starts pumping. Is it necessarily fear? Maybe or maybe not. But the adrenaline response (fight or flight) is also based upon how you perceive the response. As far as the gay dude thing, I look at it like street salesman (Sarge knows what I'm talking about here). Some days I don't mind if a salesman walks up to me on campus trying to promote some new apartment or some product. Other days I really can't be bothered and would rather them leave me alone. Sometimes as I'm walking I see them [the street salesmen/promoters/whatever] going up to other people pushing a sale. And sometimes I think "man I hope this chick/dude doesn't come up to me cause I'm not in the mood". Do I fear the salesman? No...I can simply say no and move on. After I give them the "no thank you" I expect them to walk away and go on about their business. Like others I do hope that my polite "no thank you" doesn't result in me getting badgered by the individual who just won't take no for an answer particularly if it is a clear no. No shame in their game because I know that sales people have a job to do and I don't want to knock their hussle. That's where some of the fellas (me included) may be coming from when they say they don't want attention from gay dudes. It's a slight hassle that in all honesty is rare but isn't something we WANT to deal with IF we don't HAVE to.That said, if it's truly unavoidable, and me getting hit on by the occasional gay dude is something I have to deal with while getting a lot of female attention, eh, I'll deal with it. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - ncbeareatingman - 05-26-2016 I Notice while I've been reading some of the posting here that there are some concerns about Gay men coming on to them... if ya dont wanna be bothered then try these is if it gets to a verbal communicating: Thanx for the compliment dude,a compliments a compliment but I ALREADY HAVE A DICK ,I DONT NEED ANOTHER ONE! and # 2) YOU wouldnt want it man,it'd be the worse sex ya ever had. thats leaving'um LIMP right there. ironically A str8 friend of mine told me about the 2nd one I came up with the 1st one myself. I AM HOMOSEXUAL and Like all people or mostly ALL people ,people have standard too and so DO I. if some dude who didnt know I was homosexual,which is usually the case,came on to me and I truly did NOT want to be bothered, I would say BOTH of the abouve !! NOT all str8 Men want every women not all Gay Men want every dude,just becoz theirs similar plumbing. I "tired' str8 life for 15 yrs,including marriage, didnt work. do what works fer you... a shorter right to the point version is "F-***" - off! that works too. thats My last resort. Its never happened in my life,as of yet though on ANY of the abouve Im just prepared if it does. Good luck fellas, for those that this applies too -I hope you attract all the beaver ya want,man. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Nox - 05-26-2016 I like the first one lol! RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Benjamin - 05-26-2016 Quote:Thanx for the compliment dude,a compliments a compliment but I ALREADY HAVE A DICK ,I DONT NEED ANOTHER ONE! Fucking hell Keith, I nearly spat out my coffee when I read that hahahaha. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-26-2016 (05-26-2016, 04:06 AM)dweller94 Wrote:(05-24-2016, 05:48 PM)Shannon Wrote:(05-24-2016, 04:49 PM)dweller94 Wrote: holy hell! There are a couple of statements in the script that aim to make those who respond feel at ease with and encourage them to approach and act on their desires. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-26-2016 (05-26-2016, 04:32 AM)terry44 Wrote:(05-26-2016, 03:23 AM)Alpha360 Wrote: Maybe we should start a thread with a poll about this question once and for all: Time to adjust a complex script by even one word: seconds. Time to then verify the grammar and interactivity of the whole script: minutes. Time to build the change: hours. Total time required to rebuild a single stage script I changed by one word: on the order of 4 to 13 hours. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-26-2016 (05-26-2016, 05:05 AM)FrostedFake Wrote: If you're still taking suggestions Shannon (I didn't have time to read through all those sudden posts yet), then make the aura make women extremely submissive and compliant to you and make her want to do anything you say because she's so horny (maybe also just in general). This suggestion is not feasible. You have to consider that some people are naturally dominant. Some people won't want to be made submissive. And the technology required to do this is not even possible through an aura alone, as far as I know. As to the uncontrollable urge to have sex with you... well, even the most powerful subliminal direct focus aphrodisiac in existence hasn't cracked that code yet - after 10+ years of development. You would be astonished how much control people have concerning things like that. Besides, accomplishing such a thing (uncontrollable) is an extremely intricate issue. Way too complex for this. Now an urge to have sex with you, that I can do. And that's what it's designed to do. But uncontrollable? Even if I could do that, I wouldn't. That's how forcible rape happens. And as for the last thing... that's not really a good idea either. That again is the sort of thing that leads to problems. Never against one's will. Get them to make it their will to do, but never force it. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-26-2016 (05-26-2016, 05:06 AM)maxx55 Wrote: Try to fit in as many of CatMan's suggestions as possible please Shannon (mainly the abundance mindset and girls becoming addicted part :p)! Reading it, I totally thought it read like a mini AM/SM combo, but that's GREAT for people who haven't done the full 6 stage programs. The program has two different manifestation sequences in it right now. I may reduce that to one. But OE always includes manifestation. Rewriting past memories is something that can be done, but should not. I'm not going to engage in that sort of thing. Reframing the present, leaving the past in the past, great. But memory manipulation is just bad news. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-26-2016 (05-26-2016, 05:19 AM)terry44 Wrote:(05-26-2016, 05:15 AM)Alpha360 Wrote: "Freak out", "creeped out", it's based on fear as I just said. No, you can't. "Freaked out" in the sense you're using it is a direct result of and response to fear. It may not be a fear you are consciously aware of the details of, but it is fear. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-26-2016 (05-26-2016, 05:21 AM)Alpha360 Wrote:(05-26-2016, 04:59 AM)SouthPaw Wrote: Shannon also has to think about his future customers and the ones that don't write much or at all in the forum. Sooo, if let's say 11 out of 9 say they like being checked out and fantasized by men, that really doesn't say much.You are derailing the subject or you doesn't understand. No one say they liked being checked out and it's not what I'm talking about. What I'm talking about is to make the sub less bloated and remove a limitation. The goal of the sub to begin with is not to remove unwanted attention from males, it's about being sexy/attractive. If I go even further Shannon could create a sub specifically to remove unwanted attention from males but I don't think he has the time and most people would be able to deal with it without any sub because it is a trivial thing to being with. Alpha360, you seem overly concerned with "bloat". I don't make bloated subs. You guys may think so based on inability to see all of what's going on, or maybe because you don't want or like some of the goals, but there's no bloat. They're highly optimized and streamlined, which is why they take so long to build. And in a script this short, bloat becomes a laughable word choice. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-26-2016 (05-26-2016, 06:33 AM)kenpachi Wrote:(05-26-2016, 06:24 AM)terry44 Wrote:(05-26-2016, 06:14 AM)kenpachi Wrote: If the anti-gay scripting has no negative impact whatsoever on your overall attractiveness levels, whatever, I don't care. I believed it was, but based on some of what I read here I am not entirely sure anymore. I certainly have it scripted as best I can, but I'll have to see what my predictive models say for this in a few things. I think it realisically is possible, but it may be self contradictory. We will find out shortly after this next PM run. |