Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - JackOfHearts - 05-26-2016 (05-26-2016, 05:19 AM)terry44 Wrote:(05-26-2016, 05:15 AM)Alpha360 Wrote: "Freak out", "creeped out", it's based on fear as I just said. Maybe I should say it another way. Do you agree or not that in western society there are lot of fear from homosexual? What they call homophobia, it's a real thing, if you are not aware of it then I can't do anything else and there is not point to discuss it further. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - terry44 - 05-26-2016 (05-26-2016, 05:21 AM)Alpha360 Wrote:(05-26-2016, 04:59 AM)SouthPaw Wrote: Shannon also has to think about his future customers and the ones that don't write much or at all in the forum. Sooo, if let's say 11 out of 9 say they like being checked out and fantasized by men, that really doesn't say much.You are derailing the subject or you doesn't understand. No one say they liked being checked out and it's not what I'm talking about. What I'm talking about is to make the sub less bloated and remove a limitation. The goal of the sub to begin with is not to remove unwanted attention from males, it's about being sexy/attractive. If I go even further Shannon could create a sub specifically to remove unwanted attention from males but I don't think he has the time and most people would be able to deal with it without any sub because it is a trivial thing to being with. For me an attraction sub would ideally have no effect on men one way of the other. I'm not asking for a gay repelling sub. I Just don't want men to be showing interest as a result of the sub. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - SouthPaw - 05-26-2016 Alpha360 we are talking about a 5.5G here. I don't think a "limitation"would bloat anything. And yeah, when I was reading previous post I got the feeling that some liked "being checked out and fantasized by men" RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - JackOfHearts - 05-26-2016 (05-26-2016, 05:19 AM)terry44 Wrote:(05-26-2016, 05:15 AM)Alpha360 Wrote: "Freak out", "creeped out", it's based on fear as I just said. Also the thought that you have about being freak out have no purpose, it's limitation in your mind. Whether it's gay males, or women with moustaches, or snakes or anything, if you are freak out by this thoughts it means you think about it, and it's likely a fear or something really close to that. An healthy individual doesn't think about those things, it's useless, let's say you really sleep with a moustaches girl, what would it do to you, would you die? would you get aids? It's all in your mind anyway. I can give you another example my brother has some fear about sharks, every time he sees a shark on TV he freak out and lose his rationality, then he goes watching video about shark on internet, wasting his time basically. Well I call that a fear, it's irrational and serve no purpose, the shark is not even there to begin with, he saw it on TV but still he behaves irrationally even when he is at home. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Nox - 05-26-2016 Lol you guys are too much. This isn't a fuck button. "Play sub, no work needed, girls blow you on street." Same thing with if guys are attracted to you. You really you think gay men are going to be groping you in public? sounds like you're expecting, once again, to have this sub make your decisions and decide your lives. Dudes being attracted to you wont flip the "gay switch" that lights up a pink neon sign blinking "heeeeey boys!" Sexually irresistible is still resistable folks. There are women I know who are sexually irresistible that I will not give the time of day to. And I hate to say this, but if you're a good looking guy and got your bases covered there's already guys attracted to you. Maybe a LOT. You're probably masturbation material even. Think about that, there's a man out there in love with you that you've never even noticed, and he's probably just very friendly and nice when you interact with him. Same with girls. And it is fear based, because it's uncomfortable and so you don't want to deal with it. Even if this sub does say women only, dudes are still going to be more attracted to you. You think subs are on your end only? You think their desires and subconscious also aren't framing their reality. Just deal with it. Homosexual men are turned on by you. They already have been. And they're not going to stop. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA lol RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - JackOfHearts - 05-26-2016 (05-26-2016, 05:37 AM)terry44 Wrote:Don't use the sub then, I used SM3 and it has the limitation and I still attracted Gay guys.(05-26-2016, 05:21 AM)Alpha360 Wrote:(05-26-2016, 04:59 AM)SouthPaw Wrote: Shannon also has to think about his future customers and the ones that don't write much or at all in the forum. Sooo, if let's say 11 out of 9 say they like being checked out and fantasized by men, that really doesn't say much.You are derailing the subject or you doesn't understand. No one say they liked being checked out and it's not what I'm talking about. What I'm talking about is to make the sub less bloated and remove a limitation. The goal of the sub to begin with is not to remove unwanted attention from males, it's about being sexy/attractive. If I go even further Shannon could create a sub specifically to remove unwanted attention from males but I don't think he has the time and most people would be able to deal with it without any sub because it is a trivial thing to being with. To me if you are attractive you will naturally attract the attention of people, both sex. Dzeemo used SM3 and a gay guy try to kiss him. Even with the limitation it still seems to attract gay guys maybe less but still. I say lets get rid of it. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - terry44 - 05-26-2016 (05-26-2016, 05:48 AM)Alpha360 Wrote:(05-26-2016, 05:19 AM)terry44 Wrote:(05-26-2016, 05:15 AM)Alpha360 Wrote: "Freak out", "creeped out", it's based on fear as I just said. Even if I agreed with you that freaking out is always fear, it's obvious that fear isn't always without purpose. If we were totally without fear we would be in a lot of trouble. It's there for a good reason if it stops us doing something that isn't good for us or dangerous. It's inappropriate fear that's the problem. I don't fear interest from gay men, but the thought of gay sex still freaks me out. No amount of brainwashing, hypnosis or subliminal training could make me like it. And sleeping with an obese woman with a moustache would be extremely unpleasant, and that is nothing to do with fear. You can't just say there every time someone finds something unpleasant it's because of fear. I really hate blancmange, I mean it turns my stomach, but I can assure you it's not because I'm scared of it. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - terry44 - 05-26-2016 (05-26-2016, 05:53 AM)Nox Wrote: Lol you guys are too much. This isn't a **** button. "Play sub, no work needed, girls blow you on street." Same thing with if guys are attracted to you. You really you think gay men are going to be groping you in public? sounds like you're expecting, once again, to have this sub make your decisions and decide your lives. Dudes being attracted to you wont flip the "gay switch" that lights up a pink neon sign blinking "heeeeey boys!" As I said in another post, I'm not looking for a gay repellent, I would just prefer a sub that concentrated its effects where it's wanted. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - kenpachi - 05-26-2016 If the anti-gay scripting has no negative impact whatsoever on your overall attractiveness levels, whatever, I don't care. If for the anti-gay scripting to work it means we have to be less attractive overall in order to not attract men, is it worth it? You can attract more women and tell gay men you're not interested, or attract less women so that gay men don't get interested. Which one's preferable? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - terry44 - 05-26-2016 (05-26-2016, 06:14 AM)kenpachi Wrote: If the anti-gay scripting has no negative impact whatsoever on your overall attractiveness levels, whatever, I don't care. It would be ideal if the scripting was focussed on straight women and not doing anything at all to gay men. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - kenpachi - 05-26-2016 (05-26-2016, 06:24 AM)terry44 Wrote:(05-26-2016, 06:14 AM)kenpachi Wrote: If the anti-gay scripting has no negative impact whatsoever on your overall attractiveness levels, whatever, I don't care. Agreed Terry, but I think a sexy person is a sexy person and will attract both genders. If your brain is telling you to not be sexy to men and sexy to women, it creates a conflict. It's like telling your brain to be taller and not grow in height at the same time. Maybe Shannon could chime in and say whether he thinks repelling one gender is possible without repelling the other? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Nox - 05-26-2016 (05-26-2016, 06:12 AM)terry44 Wrote:(05-26-2016, 05:53 AM)Nox Wrote: Lol you guys are too much. This isn't a **** button. "Play sub, no work needed, girls blow you on street." Same thing with if guys are attracted to you. You really you think gay men are going to be groping you in public? sounds like you're expecting, once again, to have this sub make your decisions and decide your lives. Dudes being attracted to you wont flip the "gay switch" that lights up a pink neon sign blinking "heeeeey boys!" Sexy is sexy dude. Think if it as cross training. If your endurance is at a point where you're able to go all out for three rounds in the ring, you're probably going to have decent ability to do other cardio based activities. Its just normal bleed over. You're want the best of sexiness that sexiness is going to spread out to men even if it is primarily focused on women. Even if it is a gay repellant they're going to still like you. Price of attraction. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - JackOfHearts - 05-26-2016 freak out defintion from various source: Slang. -a person who has withdrawn from normal, rational behavior and activities to pursue one interest or obsession: freak out, Slang. -to enter into or cause a period of irrational behavior or emotional instability, as under the influence of a drug: http://www.dictionary.com/browse/freak--out 1. to shock or disorient someone 2. to panic, to lose control Freak Out To achieve a state in which emotions like stress and worry are amplified. Commonly associated with OCD, deadlines, and middle aged women. Sometimes 'Freak'. http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=freak%20out freak out vb (adverb) informal to be or cause to be in a heightened emotional state, such as that of fear, anger, or excitement http://www.thefreedictionary.com/freak+out Terry44, if you think fear is useful for human then don't use every sub that contain ogsf. This was already discussed a lot of time before and well explain by Shannon. here : http://subliminal-talk.com/thread-5838-post-89452.html#pid89452 RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - terry44 - 05-26-2016 (05-26-2016, 06:42 AM)Alpha360 Wrote: freak out defintion from various source: I said there was appropriate and inappropriate fear. If you destroyed ALL fear, you would live a dangerous life. And as those definitions show, being freaked out can be feeling uncomfortable and disorientated without necessarily being scared. |