Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - JackOfHearts - 05-26-2016

(05-26-2016, 05:19 AM)terry44 Wrote:
(05-26-2016, 05:15 AM)Alpha360 Wrote: "Freak out", "creeped out", it's based on fear as I just said.

You can be freaked out by something without being scared of it. Like I said before, obese women with moustaches create no fear in me whatsoever, but the thought of sleeping with one would freak me out.

Maybe I should say it another way. Do you agree or not that in western society there are lot of fear from homosexual? What they call homophobia, it's a real thing, if you are not aware of it then I can't do anything else and there is not point to discuss it further.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - terry44 - 05-26-2016

(05-26-2016, 05:21 AM)Alpha360 Wrote:
(05-26-2016, 04:59 AM)SouthPaw Wrote: Shannon also has to think about his future customers and the ones that don't write much or at all in the forum. Sooo, if let's say 11 out of 9 say they like being checked out and fantasized by men, that really doesn't say much.

And I would like to add that making women extremely wet and this stuff is just perverted and no healthy man would want that. We still want to live our normal lifes and have normal interactions. Not everyone is desperate.

I find how Shannon described it is how it should be "become as sexy and attractive as you can be". Of course without things going out if control which will just backfire.

Unconditional love, gratitude, deservedness and any other positive and healthy additions are always good.
You are derailing the subject or you doesn't understand. No one say they liked being checked out and it's not what I'm talking about. What I'm talking about is to make the sub less bloated and remove a limitation. The goal of the sub to begin with is not to remove unwanted attention from males, it's about being sexy/attractive. If I go even further Shannon could create a sub specifically to remove unwanted attention from males but I don't think he has the time and most people would be able to deal with it without any sub because it is a trivial thing to being with.

Edit:
A question someone could ask himself is the following: if Shannon would create a sub specifically to remove unwanted attention from men would you use it, would you waste your time with that when you could use another sub?

For me an attraction sub would ideally have no effect on men one way of the other. I'm not asking for a gay repelling sub. I Just don't want men to be showing interest as a result of the sub.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - SouthPaw - 05-26-2016

Alpha360 we are talking about a 5.5G here. I don't think a "limitation"would bloat anything.

And yeah, when I was reading previous post I got the feeling that some liked "being checked out and fantasized by men"


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - JackOfHearts - 05-26-2016

(05-26-2016, 05:19 AM)terry44 Wrote:
(05-26-2016, 05:15 AM)Alpha360 Wrote: "Freak out", "creeped out", it's based on fear as I just said.

You can be freaked out by something without being scared of it. Like I said before, obese women with moustaches create no fear in me whatsoever, but the thought of sleeping with one would freak me out.

Also the thought that you have about being freak out have no purpose, it's limitation in your mind. Whether it's gay males, or women with moustaches, or snakes or anything, if you are freak out by this thoughts it means you think about it, and it's likely a fear or something really close to that. An healthy individual doesn't think about those things, it's useless, let's say you really sleep with a moustaches girl, what would it do to you, would you die? would you get aids? It's all in your mind anyway.
I can give you another example my brother has some fear about sharks, every time he sees a shark on TV he freak out and lose his rationality, then he goes watching video about shark on internet, wasting his time basically. Well I call that a fear, it's irrational and serve no purpose, the shark is not even there to begin with, he saw it on TV but still he behaves irrationally even when he is at home.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Nox - 05-26-2016

Lol you guys are too much. This isn't a fuck button. "Play sub, no work needed, girls blow you on street." Same thing with if guys are attracted to you. You really you think gay men are going to be groping you in public? sounds like you're expecting, once again, to have this sub make your decisions and decide your lives. Dudes being attracted to you wont flip the "gay switch" that lights up a pink neon sign blinking "heeeeey boys!"

Sexually irresistible is still resistable folks. There are women I know who are sexually irresistible that I will not give the time of day to. And I hate to say this, but if you're a good looking guy and got your bases covered there's already guys attracted to you. Maybe a LOT. You're probably masturbation material even. Think about that, there's a man out there in love with you that you've never even noticed, and he's probably just very friendly and nice when you interact with him. Same with girls.

And it is fear based, because it's uncomfortable and so you don't want to deal with it. Even if this sub does say women only, dudes are still going to be more attracted to you. You think subs are on your end only? You think their desires and subconscious also aren't framing their reality. Just deal with it. Homosexual men are turned on by you. They already have been. And they're not going to stop. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA lol


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - JackOfHearts - 05-26-2016

(05-26-2016, 05:37 AM)terry44 Wrote:
(05-26-2016, 05:21 AM)Alpha360 Wrote:
(05-26-2016, 04:59 AM)SouthPaw Wrote: Shannon also has to think about his future customers and the ones that don't write much or at all in the forum. Sooo, if let's say 11 out of 9 say they like being checked out and fantasized by men, that really doesn't say much.

And I would like to add that making women extremely wet and this stuff is just perverted and no healthy man would want that. We still want to live our normal lifes and have normal interactions. Not everyone is desperate.

I find how Shannon described it is how it should be "become as sexy and attractive as you can be". Of course without things going out if control which will just backfire.

Unconditional love, gratitude, deservedness and any other positive and healthy additions are always good.
You are derailing the subject or you doesn't understand. No one say they liked being checked out and it's not what I'm talking about. What I'm talking about is to make the sub less bloated and remove a limitation. The goal of the sub to begin with is not to remove unwanted attention from males, it's about being sexy/attractive. If I go even further Shannon could create a sub specifically to remove unwanted attention from males but I don't think he has the time and most people would be able to deal with it without any sub because it is a trivial thing to being with.

Edit:
A question someone could ask himself is the following: if Shannon would create a sub specifically to remove unwanted attention from men would you use it, would you waste your time with that when you could use another sub?

For me an attraction sub would ideally have no effect on men one way of the other. I'm not asking for a gay repelling sub. I Just don't want men to be showing interest as a result of the sub.
Don't use the sub then, I used SM3 and it has the limitation and I still attracted Gay guys.
To me if you are attractive you will naturally attract the attention of people, both sex. Dzeemo used SM3 and a gay guy try to kiss him.
Even with the limitation it still seems to attract gay guys maybe less but still. I say lets get rid of it.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - terry44 - 05-26-2016

(05-26-2016, 05:48 AM)Alpha360 Wrote:
(05-26-2016, 05:19 AM)terry44 Wrote:
(05-26-2016, 05:15 AM)Alpha360 Wrote: "Freak out", "creeped out", it's based on fear as I just said.

You can be freaked out by something without being scared of it. Like I said before, obese women with moustaches create no fear in me whatsoever, but the thought of sleeping with one would freak me out.

Also the thought that you have about being freak out have no purpose, it's limitation in your mind. Whether it's gay males, or women with moustaches, or snakes or anything, if you are freak out by this thoughts it means you think about it, and it's likely a fear or something really close to that. An healthy individual doesn't think about those things, it's useless, let's say you really sleep with a moustaches girl, what would it do to you, would you die? would you get aids? It's all in your mind anyway.
I can give you another example my brother has some fear about sharks, every time he sees a shark on TV he freak out and lose his rationality, then he goes watching video about shark on internet, wasting his time basically. Well I call that a fear, it's irrational and serve no purpose, the shark is not even there to begin with, he saw it on TV but still he behaves irrationally even when he is at home.

Even if I agreed with you that freaking out is always fear, it's obvious that fear isn't always without purpose. If we were totally without fear we would be in a lot of trouble. It's there for a good reason if it stops us doing something that isn't good for us or dangerous. It's inappropriate fear that's the problem. I don't fear interest from gay men, but the thought of gay sex still freaks me out. No amount of brainwashing, hypnosis or subliminal training could make me like it. And sleeping with an obese woman with a moustache would be extremely unpleasant, and that is nothing to do with fear. You can't just say there every time someone finds something unpleasant it's because of fear. I really hate blancmange, I mean it turns my stomach, but I can assure you it's not because I'm scared of it.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - terry44 - 05-26-2016

(05-26-2016, 05:53 AM)Nox Wrote: Lol you guys are too much. This isn't a **** button. "Play sub, no work needed, girls blow you on street." Same thing with if guys are attracted to you. You really you think gay men are going to be groping you in public? sounds like you're expecting, once again, to have this sub make your decisions and decide your lives. Dudes being attracted to you wont flip the "gay switch" that lights up a pink neon sign blinking "heeeeey boys!"

Sexually irresistible is still resistable folks. There are women I know who are sexually irresistible that I will not give the time of day to. And I hate to say this, but if you're a good looking guy and got your bases covered there's already guys attracted to you. Maybe a LOT. You're probably masturbation material even. Think about that, there's a man out there in love with you that you've never even noticed, and he's probably just very friendly and nice when you interact with him. Same with girls.

And it is fear based, because it's uncomfortable and so you don't want to deal with it. Even if this sub does say women only, dudes are still going to be more attracted to you. You think subs are on your end only? You think their desires and subconscious also aren't framing their reality. Just deal with it. Homosexual men are turned on by you. They already have been. And they're not going to stop. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA lol

As I said in another post, I'm not looking for a gay repellent, I would just prefer a sub that concentrated its effects where it's wanted.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - kenpachi - 05-26-2016

If the anti-gay scripting has no negative impact whatsoever on your overall attractiveness levels, whatever, I don't care.

If for the anti-gay scripting to work it means we have to be less attractive overall in order to not attract men, is it worth it?

You can attract more women and tell gay men you're not interested, or attract less women so that gay men don't get interested. Which one's preferable?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - terry44 - 05-26-2016

(05-26-2016, 06:14 AM)kenpachi Wrote: If the anti-gay scripting has no negative impact whatsoever on your overall attractiveness levels, whatever, I don't care.

If for the anti-gay scripting to work it means we have to be less attractive overall in order to not attract men, is it worth it?

You can attract more women and tell gay men you're not interested, or attract less women so that gay men don't get interested. Which one's preferable?

It would be ideal if the scripting was focussed on straight women and not doing anything at all to gay men.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - kenpachi - 05-26-2016

(05-26-2016, 06:24 AM)terry44 Wrote:
(05-26-2016, 06:14 AM)kenpachi Wrote: If the anti-gay scripting has no negative impact whatsoever on your overall attractiveness levels, whatever, I don't care.

If for the anti-gay scripting to work it means we have to be less attractive overall in order to not attract men, is it worth it?

You can attract more women and tell gay men you're not interested, or attract less women so that gay men don't get interested. Which one's preferable?

It would be ideal if the scripting was focussed on straight women and not doing anything at all to gay men.

Agreed Terry, but I think a sexy person is a sexy person and will attract both genders.

If your brain is telling you to not be sexy to men and sexy to women, it creates a conflict. It's like telling your brain to be taller and not grow in height at the same time. Maybe Shannon could chime in and say whether he thinks repelling one gender is possible without repelling the other?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Nox - 05-26-2016

(05-26-2016, 06:12 AM)terry44 Wrote:
(05-26-2016, 05:53 AM)Nox Wrote: Lol you guys are too much. This isn't a **** button. "Play sub, no work needed, girls blow you on street." Same thing with if guys are attracted to you. You really you think gay men are going to be groping you in public? sounds like you're expecting, once again, to have this sub make your decisions and decide your lives. Dudes being attracted to you wont flip the "gay switch" that lights up a pink neon sign blinking "heeeeey boys!"

Sexually irresistible is still resistable folks. There are women I know who are sexually irresistible that I will not give the time of day to. And I hate to say this, but if you're a good looking guy and got your bases covered there's already guys attracted to you. Maybe a LOT. You're probably masturbation material even. Think about that, there's a man out there in love with you that you've never even noticed, and he's probably just very friendly and nice when you interact with him. Same with girls.

And it is fear based, because it's uncomfortable and so you don't want to deal with it. Even if this sub does say women only, dudes are still going to be more attracted to you. You think subs are on your end only? You think their desires and subconscious also aren't framing their reality. Just deal with it. Homosexual men are turned on by you. They already have been. And they're not going to stop. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA lol

As I said in another post, I'm not looking for a gay repellent, I would just prefer a sub that concentrated its effects where it's wanted.

Sexy is sexy dude. Think if it as cross training. If your endurance is at a point where you're able to go all out for three rounds in the ring, you're probably going to have decent ability to do other cardio based activities. Its just normal bleed over. You're want the best of sexiness that sexiness is going to spread out to men even if it is primarily focused on women. Even if it is a gay repellant they're going to still like you. Price of attraction.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - JackOfHearts - 05-26-2016

freak out defintion from various source:
Slang.
-a person who has withdrawn from normal, rational behavior and activities to pursue one interest or obsession:
freak out, Slang.
-to enter into or cause a period of irrational behavior or emotional instability, as under the influence of a drug:
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/freak--out

1. to shock or disorient someone
2. to panic, to lose control

Freak Out
To achieve a state in which emotions like stress and worry are amplified. Commonly associated with OCD, deadlines, and middle aged women. Sometimes 'Freak'.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=freak%20out

freak out
vb (adverb)
informal to be or cause to be in a heightened emotional state, such as that of fear, anger, or excitement
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/freak+out

Terry44, if you think fear is useful for human then don't use
every sub that contain ogsf. This was already discussed a lot of time before and well explain by Shannon.
here :
http://subliminal-talk.com/thread-5838-post-89452.html#pid89452


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - terry44 - 05-26-2016

(05-26-2016, 06:42 AM)Alpha360 Wrote: freak out defintion from various source:
Slang.
-a person who has withdrawn from normal, rational behavior and activities to pursue one interest or obsession:
freak out, Slang.
-to enter into or cause a period of irrational behavior or emotional instability, as under the influence of a drug:
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/freak--out

1. to shock or disorient someone
2. to panic, to lose control

Freak Out
To achieve a state in which emotions like stress and worry are amplified. Commonly associated with OCD, deadlines, and middle aged women. Sometimes 'Freak'.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=freak%20out

freak out
vb (adverb)
informal to be or cause to be in a heightened emotional state, such as that of fear, anger, or excitement
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/freak+out

Terry44, if you think fear is useful for human then don't use
every sub that contain ogsf. This was already discussed a lot of time before and well explain by Shannon.
here :
http://subliminal-talk.com/thread-5838-post-89452.html#pid89452

I said there was appropriate and inappropriate fear. If you destroyed ALL fear, you would live a dangerous life. And as those definitions show, being freaked out can be feeling uncomfortable and disorientated without necessarily being scared.