+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - dweller94 - 05-21-2016
(05-21-2016, 03:29 PM)Shannon Wrote:(05-21-2016, 03:26 PM)dweller94 Wrote: @Shannon
I wanted to know during Stage 7 on AM6, how much time does it take for the entire script to be expressed once?
That is not public information. It is significantly less time than the length of the audio, but long enough that I was forced to make it the length I used instead of something shorter. That's as specific as I can get with that.
http://subliminal-talk.com/thread-5333-post-72651.html#pid72651
You mentioned a rough calculation of how many times 6G subs would execute the script once, I am asking due to sometimes not being able to get the full 1hour 20mins on the masked audio in one standing especially when I'm out and about (travelling), not an issue with ultrasonics at night though.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-21-2016
(05-21-2016, 05:05 PM)dweller94 Wrote:(05-21-2016, 03:29 PM)Shannon Wrote:(05-21-2016, 03:26 PM)dweller94 Wrote: @Shannon
I wanted to know during Stage 7 on AM6, how much time does it take for the entire script to be expressed once?
That is not public information. It is significantly less time than the length of the audio, but long enough that I was forced to make it the length I used instead of something shorter. That's as specific as I can get with that.
http://subliminal-talk.com/thread-5333-post-72651.html#pid72651
You mentioned a rough calculation of how many times 6G subs would execute the script once, I am asking due to sometimes not being able to get the full 1hour 20mins on the masked audio in one standing especially when I'm out and about (travelling), not an issue with ultrasonics at night though.
That doesn't follow. AM6 is 5G, and that's a lot less WPM than 6G. What would take hours to express once in 5G I can express many times over in about 10 to 15 minutes in 6G because they are not using anywhere close to the same compression technologies. And, each 5G base file length is different according to the script length. I can't know how many times exactly once the build files are erased. That is why it's not public knowledge.
I would estimate from memory that it's about once every 15 to 20 minutes for that stage of that program, though.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Nox - 05-22-2016
(05-22-2016, 12:35 PM)FrostedFake Wrote: We should have a party where everybody has to run WM2 at the same time and at the end of stage 6 we all get together. That would be the best party ever!
Bro Magnet lol
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-22-2016
(05-22-2016, 06:13 AM)FrostedFake Wrote: Do I need an AM refresher if I'm going to run E2 for 3-6 months after WM2? I'll be running the latest AM right after.
Given how different the directions of those programs are, I would say absolutely.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - apollolux - 05-22-2016
Hey Shannon, what will the upcoming AOS 5G contain that's different and/or improved from AOS 4G?
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Jakeb203 - 05-22-2016
Shannon, could you rebuild BIATBWS after finish creating AOS? Users here often want to run both for the same cause, as running big multistages such as SM or WM may require too much time commitment.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-22-2016
(05-22-2016, 04:55 PM)apollolux Wrote: Hey Shannon, what will the upcoming AOS 5G contain that's different and/or improved from AOS 4G?
1. It will be built in 5G format.
2. It will be based on OE 3.x
3. It will be using methods I developed during 6G development to flood you with exactly the right types of energy to accomplish the goal.
4. It will be much more powerful in at least two different directions.
5. It should be much more obvious once it kicks in.
6. It should work much more quickly.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-22-2016
(05-22-2016, 05:01 PM)Sky_Wolf Wrote: Hey Shannon, got anymore 5.5 G's lined up for us after you finished what you’re currently working on? BIATBWS would be interesting.
Yes, but they will have to wait a bit.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-22-2016
(05-22-2016, 05:22 PM)Jakeb203 Wrote: Shannon, could you rebuild BIATBWS after finish creating AOS? Users here often want to run both for the same cause, as running big multistages such as SM or WM may require too much time commitment.
I could, yes. Will I? That depends on what the circumstances look like. Whatever is worked on is whatever has priority, and whatever has priority is determined by a number of factors, some of which are outside of my control.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-22-2016
(05-22-2016, 05:32 PM)Sky_Wolf Wrote: @Shannon
If the thought of a girl pops into your head randomly, could it be because she is thinking of you?
Yes. In fact it is frequently true, for me at least, that if out of nowhere I start thinking about someone I have no real reason to be thinking about, and especially as they have not been in contact for longer and longer durations, that they have, in fact, been thinking about me at the time I have that happen.
Sometimes it annoys my friends when I say things like, "So, why, three days ago, did you think about calling me, but not actually do it?" I have a few friends I can do that with, and I'm usually pretty accurate.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - bogdy - 05-22-2016
Well MHS is on queue again ?
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - maxx55 - 05-22-2016
So Shannon is the new AoS a 5.5G since it has some 6G tech? And also, I'm curious why you're just building AoS instead of the much requested AoS+BIATBWS in a single sub, or is what you're working on even superior to that?
Thanks in advance!
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Light - 05-23-2016
Hey Shannon, now that you are working on DAOS
i want to ask you if you are going to keep the component/type C in the sub. Long term users have reported real and noticeable changes at the level of their face. This makes this sub one of the most powerful, probably, in terms of physical change.
will you also keep it a C type subliminal ? Is there any chance of enhancing that, imean in terms of physical changes?
That would make it very interesting sub for all users.thanks
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-23-2016
(05-22-2016, 08:50 PM)maxx55 Wrote: So Shannon is the new AoS a 5.5G since it has some 6G tech? And also, I'm curious why you're just building AoS instead of the much requested AoS+BIATBWS in a single sub, or is what you're working on even superior to that?
Thanks in advance!
No. 5.5G takes more time than I can reasonably spend on this type of program for the time being. The 6G influence will be minimal.
I'm building this for a few reasons, some of which shall remain unknown. But suffice it to say that this is a stepping stone to greater things, and I have to build it in the short term to achieve my medium and long term goals.
When I get done with it, it may just be superior to the combination. We shall see what I have time to do.