![]() |
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shawn - 05-13-2016 (05-13-2016, 07:08 PM)yeah! Wrote: What are these cycles called and how can I find out what ours are and where were at? The biggest one is discussed HERE. After knowing this you can find another ones. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-14-2016 (05-13-2016, 07:08 PM)yeah! Wrote: What are these cycles called and how can I find out what ours are and where were at? As Mr. Anderson said, the most major of them is what I was talking about where he linked. But there are many others, some visible through that system and some not. All of them have impact on one's life and all of them are worth being aware of, but very few people ever pay attention because popular mindset is that they have no validity, correlation to anything or real value. People are welcome to whatever limits they want to have. Me, I'm going to use the tools that I have available to me. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Cozy - 05-15-2016 (05-14-2016, 04:16 PM)Shannon Wrote:(05-13-2016, 07:08 PM)yeah! Wrote: What are these cycles called and how can I find out what ours are and where were at? Shannon, what was it that convinced you of the validity of astrology? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - "Q" - 05-15-2016 Shannon Wrote:The new AOS prototype is also in the worksI am going to sound like a broken record, now...but any chance that you would consider including an aura of unconditional love with AOS? If anything, it should 'temper' the effects of AOS so that it is not too sexually intimidating in its effect. So, you would get the double whammy synergistic effect. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - JackOfHearts - 05-15-2016 (05-15-2016, 01:46 AM)Banksy Wrote:(05-14-2016, 04:16 PM)Shannon Wrote:(05-13-2016, 07:08 PM)yeah! Wrote: What are these cycles called and how can I find out what ours are and where were at? I would rephrase it the other way around, what makes someone convinced that astrology doesn't work? They never studied it, never made their chart, never took the time to search if it is possible that it could work. It just took me 2 days to notice that this thing was amazingly accurate. Then a week to notice that this can't be a coincidence that every chart I cast made sense even with the little stuff I knew. Cast the chart of people you know, your friends, your family, then some very well known people like Michael Jackson. It would then be really difficult to prove that astrology doesn't work. A lot of astrologer have tested astrology statistically, and they found a pattern, even if you use only the Sun sign which is less than 5% of the personality you will find something that isn't a coincidence. You won't find on internet someone who tested astrology statistically and found that it doesn't work. There is no proof that astrology doesn't work, the opposite is true, there is proof that astrology works, at least if it's done properly. It's far more easier to prove that astrology works than subliminal. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - bogdy - 05-15-2016 Shannon Wrote:Almost finished with Andrew's sub. Then back to MHS. That is what i needed to hear! Thanks Shannon! RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Cozy - 05-15-2016 (05-15-2016, 01:17 PM)Alpha360 Wrote:(05-15-2016, 01:46 AM)Banksy Wrote:(05-14-2016, 04:16 PM)Shannon Wrote:(05-13-2016, 07:08 PM)yeah! Wrote: What are these cycles called and how can I find out what ours are and where were at? Hey, I'm an open minded person, if you can come up with an argument for or against something that matches evidence, I'm game. What were the videos that convinced you in 2 days? I tend to think the "personality descriptions" or traits can describe anyone on different levels, but I could be wrong. I'd like to know how astrology can predict events in people's lives or occurrences around the world. Is there anything to establish this as fact? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Benjamin - 05-15-2016 Guys can you keep the astrology talk to the thread http://subliminal-talk.com/thread-7130.html not other places on the forum. Rule 4. (Modified 10/29/2012) Users may not make mention of, or discuss religion or any concepts commonly incorporated into religious belief systems. (Including astrology) This is a broad ban on religion and religious concepts. If you wish to make any mention of religion, there is a religion-safe and an astrology thread in the chatter box. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - heavysm - 05-15-2016 Shannon, I know this probably isn't a priority since I don't hear it mentioned very often, but do you think that the Ultimate Writer sub will contain Maximum Sales Success as a module? Though sales isn't necessarily a primary attribute of writing, I am getting into sales copywriting now and writing persuasively enough to get people to do stuff (buy something or submit an email) is everything. It's also assumed that people who write for a living will need to advertise their stuff adequately, so I just wanted to mention it as at least a possibility for now because I think developing both sales skills and / or systems is very important for any successful writer. I get that even considering this right now may not be a thing with so much going on for you, but hopefully this comes into consideration later when you're gearing up to assemble UW. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - SouthPaw - 05-16-2016 I agree with Q about the love thing in AOS and Shannon you would make massive sales if you could get it out before the end of June ;-) RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - JackOfHearts - 05-16-2016 (05-15-2016, 02:32 PM)Banksy Wrote:http://subliminal-talk.com/thread-7130-post-109707.html#pid109707(05-15-2016, 01:17 PM)Alpha360 Wrote:(05-15-2016, 01:46 AM)Banksy Wrote:(05-14-2016, 04:16 PM)Shannon Wrote:(05-13-2016, 07:08 PM)yeah! Wrote: What are these cycles called and how can I find out what ours are and where were at? http://subliminal-talk.com/thread-7130-post-109711.html#pid109711 RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-16-2016 (05-15-2016, 08:56 PM)heavysm Wrote: Shannon, I know this probably isn't a priority since I don't hear it mentioned very often, but do you think that the Ultimate Writer sub will contain Maximum Sales Success as a module? The Ultimate Writer sub would contain everything that would benefit a writer, including sales, editing, etc. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-16-2016 (05-15-2016, 12:17 PM)"Q Wrote:Shannon Wrote:The new AOS prototype is also in the worksI am going to sound like a broken record, now...but any chance that you would consider including an aura of unconditional love with AOS? If anything, it should 'temper' the effects of AOS so that it is not too sexually intimidating in its effect. So, you would get the double whammy synergistic effect. I'll consider it, sure, since that's part of what attracts women. But the goal is sexiness. So whatever makes it in, has to fit the goal. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-16-2016 (05-15-2016, 01:46 AM)Banksy Wrote:(05-14-2016, 04:16 PM)Shannon Wrote:(05-13-2016, 07:08 PM)yeah! Wrote: What are these cycles called and how can I find out what ours are and where were at? I answered this in the astrology thread in the chatterbox, where these questions should have been in the first place. |