Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Thread-Vol-5) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - CatMan - 06-09-2020 Hi Shannon, congrats on FRM V4.9. 1. Just curious, initially you mentioned 17 new concepts you've scripted for in this release. Then in a later post, you mentioned a couple more ideas you had. So, I just wanted to know, what ended up being the final total for new concepts added to FRM V4.9.? Any other changes besides new concepts added to it? I know you mentioned in the past you wanted the FRM process of dealing with a certain aspect of fear removal to be "much much faster" (link: https://subliminal-talk.com/Thread-DMSI-3-3-2-light-at-the-end-of-the-tunnel?pid=228339#pid228339". Has that been done in FRM V4.9 too? 2. You spoke before of "a specific aspect of fear removal FRM V4.8 was doing", and that you thought it would take at least 2-3 weeks to go through. I assume that aspect didn't work according to plan? What was done to this section of the script in particular? That post always intrigued me. 3. Also, what are some of the things you've been able to work on in V3.3.3? I know you've spoke of the "aura" aspect being one of particular focus that needs a lot of addressing to make the affected feel attraction and take action. Has that been worked on yet? What about the power increase of the program you felt was necessary before, like ME etc.? What else has been worked on with V3.3.3? I know you said you've been working on it secretly for awhile, haha. Thank you, Shannon. Looking forward to the new and improved DMSI soon, now that FRM V4.9 is here! RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Zubrowka - 06-09-2020 (06-08-2020, 09:24 AM)Shannon Wrote:(06-08-2020, 08:25 AM)Zubrowka Wrote:(06-08-2020, 07:58 AM)Shannon Wrote:(06-08-2020, 07:45 AM)DarthXedonias Wrote:(06-07-2020, 06:10 AM)Shannon Wrote: I don't take working with genetics and epigenetics lightly. It's not something to do without having a good reason, and understanding what is going on. So far the MHS has shown that the genetic component in it seems to be as safe as it was designed to be, but attempts at altering the genes and epigenetics have to be reserved for where they are safe, effective and useful. I don't doubt that you do what you can to make it safe, but while reading things like the following quotes i can't help but becoming a bit concerned that it maybe shouldn't be done. "Other ethical concerns are: unintentionally editing the human germline forever, not knowing how one change to a human germline will affect the expression of the remainder of the genes. A scientist recently made an apt analogy for us to understand in regard to mapping and manipulating the human genome / germline is in relation to a stage play: it is if we have very precise character descriptions (the mapped genome), and yet we (the scientific community) have no idea yet how the characters interact with each other. In other words, if one makes one change to the human germline, what other cascade of changes might we be making? [23] [24]" And "For safety, ethical, and social reasons, there is broad agreement among the scientific community, and the public that germline editing is a red line that should not be crossed." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_germline_engineering RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 06-09-2020 (06-08-2020, 01:20 PM)tolgaocal80 Wrote: Hi Shannon, as you had finished FRM 4.9, If it was that easy, I would have all my subs be usable together already. DRS can be used with some other subs because it only manipulates energy. When it comes to the vast majority of my sublkminals, they do much more than that, and they are attempting to access and use ALL of the resources possible. You just can't do that with 2+ and get a good result. The goal is to make each subliminal achieve it's goals fully. OF 5.75G is not something you will want to try to use with something else unless I build it into that something else. Trust me on this... you want to let it do it's job alone. Figuring out how to make subs work together simultaneously without suffering issues for achieving the goals of each sub, at the levels I work, will take me months, if not years of work. And for a while, I will not have that time to spare. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 06-09-2020 (06-08-2020, 04:06 PM)samba99 Wrote: Shannon, FRM was developed inside DMSI, but that's only because it is the prinary placeholder for new skeleton script additions. I'll be porting it to other subs until I build DMSI and re-base the skeleton script on DMSI 3.3.3. Once those are done, probably I'll start round robin on DMSI, LTU6, USLM4.2 and USM2. Or maybe I'll pick one and knock it out, and then move like that if the work isn't so long that I burn out. I will let you know when we're at the 32 day mark. Because of communication failures, I get exposed to my girlfriend using LTU a lot when I might not want to be exposed. It degrades the effects of UMS, sure. But if I am using it only for a while, I am loving what it does and how it feels. I'm using it right now. I can feel myself projecting some very interesting energy. I am enjoying how UMS makes me think differently and act differently. The progress I have made isn't instant, but it is substantial. Like turning the Titanic. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 06-09-2020 (06-08-2020, 10:03 PM)Rossignol17 Wrote: Hi Shannon, Not at this time. I am trying to manage the balance between building what needs to be built, and maintaining the income for the business. So far my efforts have produced several very good subliminals, but not much interest in them. That means I have to prioritize building subs that will generate interest until I succeed, and buy myself the time to build stuff that goes out without necessarily getting paid for. I'm doing my best, but things are not going according to plan. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 06-09-2020 (06-09-2020, 06:26 AM)CatMan Wrote: Hi Shannon, congrats on FRM V4.9. I ended up adding a couple new ideas, and a couple ideas did not pan out, so we have in the end... 17. FRM 4.9 focuses not on speed, but on success. Speed will come later, if faster turns out to be possible, safe and desirable. Although there is some scripting that should speed it up, but not because I am focusing on speed - rather because I am trying things that should result in much better success instead of resistance and evasion. More speed may in fact be entirely unnecessary. Quote:2. You spoke before of "a specific aspect of fear removal FRM V4.8 was doing", and that you thought it would take at least 2-3 weeks to go through. I assume that aspect didn't work according to plan? What was done to this section of the script in particular? That post always intrigued me. I'm not sure what you're referring to, exactly. Quote:3. Also, what are some of the things you've been able to work on in V3.3.3? I know you've spoke of the "aura" aspect being one of particular focus that needs a lot of addressing to make the affected feel attraction and take action. Has that been worked on yet? What about the power increase of the program you felt was necessary before, like ME etc.? What else has been worked on with V3.3.3? I know you said you've been working on it secretly for awhile, haha. I have implemented a new skeleton script module that should make all parts of the script function significantly better, faster, more easily and with higher success rates. That's about it so far. The aura has been worked on in terms of coming up with ideas for how to improve it, but I have not had time to work on scripting those ideas. Remember, working on such advanced scripting and concepts doesn't necessarily mean me typing away at the script. FRM took most of a year of just contemplation to find ways to improve it over 4.8. I have what you could compare to an 8-core processor, and all 8 cores are always chewing on something. I've been working on DMSI scripting for a few weeks. But I'm also working on scripting other things, building programs, etc. FRM was the big bottle neck, so I focused on that, which is indirectly working on DMSI. A lot of how to make DMSI work has been done with work on FRM and one other area I'm not ready to talk about yet. The rest has been preparing what needs to be done, what to do, and how to do it. These ultra-complex subs require a lot of staging work to even allow work on them script wise and such. Quote:Thank you, Shannon. Looking forward to the new and improved DMSI soon, now that FRM V4.9 is here! I'm doing my best, but this right now is a very challenging time for me to deal with. I need five of me to do everything that needs to be done. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 06-09-2020 (06-09-2020, 06:36 AM)Zubrowka Wrote:(06-08-2020, 09:24 AM)Shannon Wrote:(06-08-2020, 08:25 AM)Zubrowka Wrote:(06-08-2020, 07:58 AM)Shannon Wrote:(06-08-2020, 07:45 AM)DarthXedonias Wrote: Hmmm I had to think for like a day to think how I was going to respond to this because some of this is feelings, intuitions, etc and I'm not sure how to exactly put that all into words. I can tell you sometimes while I have listened to it I've felt this deep cleaning. Not simply the detox no this was something else. It felt like it was changing me on a much deeper and I would say even cellular level. Along with this I had felt some resistance but I had this intuition that the genetic component had to deal with this feeling I was having. It was this feeling that I was being "controlled" and I didn't like it as much but I felt "compelled" to listen. Only way I got past that feeling was to perhaps calm myself down and be ok with "letting go" to a degree. Obviously this isn't from FRM as FRM is turned off for the sub. Could be the upgraded magnus engine but I don't think so. Could be a combination possibly. You're basing your judgements on assumptions that may not have any correlation, and probably do not. The science of genetic editing, etc. is doing their thing very differently than how I am doing it. What holds for them, may not hold for my approach. But it is because I am not all-knowing that I am so cautious. Consider that there are several subliminals producers who claim to have been doing genetic manipulation in their subs for years now. I've released one sub with this tech, and spent 6 years learning how to do it right first. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - CatMan - 06-09-2020 (06-09-2020, 08:34 AM)Shannon Wrote:(06-09-2020, 06:26 AM)CatMan Wrote: Hi Shannon, congrats on FRM V4.9. Thank you so much for the update! Here's a link to two screenshots I have of earlier posts. They seem to have been made about a month before you made this new version of the discussion thread. No wonder I couldn't reference them earlier, here's the thing I was talking about in my second question: https://paste.pics/245e5bd42cfcd5a0fcc6d1edf0735446 Two more things: 1. I'm fascinated by the prospects of epigenetics/genetics work being implemented. I do however, also understand your apprehension. But, a program with a goal of DMSI's, it seems tailor made for such an inclusion. Making someone able to fully "develop maximum sexual irresistability", would make such a thing ideal for it!! Seems tailor made for that goal, transformational in the highest respect! Please please consider the idea of implementation of this in 3.3.3. 2. If you put in FRM V4.9, I've always been confused how the affected person "gets" FRM and acts. I mean, we can struggle to execute even after conscious listening for months, so it's always struck me as odd that in a chance meeting, the affected is expected to just "execute" based off our aura etc. That part always makes me tend to question things is all. I don't get the whole M.O. at that part of things I think. Thank you, Shannon! Hopefully the picture refreshes your memory on what I was referencing. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Zubrowka - 06-09-2020 (06-09-2020, 08:37 AM)Shannon Wrote: You're basing your judgements on assumptions that may not have any correlation, and probably do not. The science of genetic editing, etc. is doing their thing very differently than how I am doing it. What holds for them, may not hold for my approach. I'm note sure that the following quote is something that is based on my judgement or assumptions. And that the rest of producers are making them, and that you have worked on learning how to do it for six years don't automatically say that it's safe, or something that should be done. And that usual science is doing the manipulation of genes in a different way than you, don't take away the fact that there can be hidden interdependencies that neither you or them can know about. Quote:"For safety, ethical, and social reasons, there is broad agreement among the scientific community, and the public that germline editing is a red line that should not be crossed." RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Zubrowka - 06-09-2020 (06-09-2020, 08:21 AM)Shannon Wrote:(06-08-2020, 10:03 PM)Rossignol17 Wrote: Hi Shannon, I heard a great analogy in how long time it takes to break through doing music with pumping a water pump, you know that one that stand in the field with a handle on it. You pump, pump, pump and the water need to travel up through the pipes, and you need to pump a while before you will see any of it, but when the water start flowing you will have a continuous flow. I liked it, though I would share it with you. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 06-09-2020 (06-09-2020, 10:28 AM)CatMan Wrote:(06-09-2020, 08:34 AM)Shannon Wrote:(06-09-2020, 06:26 AM)CatMan Wrote: Hi Shannon, congrats on FRM V4.9. Quote:2. You spoke before of "a specific aspect of fear removal FRM V4.8 was doing", and that you thought it would take at least 2-3 weeks to go through. I assume that aspect didn't work according to plan? What was done to this section of the script in particular? That post always intrigued me. That section of the script does work. Nothing was done to it specifically. I added new script to make 4.9. Quote:Two more things: It's not ready for that, even if it was indicated as being helpful/useful. It may end up being included in 3.4, but it's not ready for use in DMSI as it exists. And we don't have a solid lead on what to use it for/on in DMSI yet. Genetic adjustment is used with extreme caution. Quote:2. If you put in FRM V4.9, I've always been confused how the affected person "gets" FRM and acts. I mean, we can struggle to execute even after conscious listening for months, so it's always struck me as odd that in a chance meeting, the affected is expected to just "execute" based off our aura etc. That part always makes me tend to question things is all. I don't get the whole M.O. at that part of things I think. First, your fears are not their fears. Second, DMSI is experimental because we are literally discovering what is and is not possible in this direction. I have been very confident this can work, and my results so far have only borne that out, but we do have fear getting in the way in both directions. Figuring that out required progressive steps to observe the results of. Third, in 3.3.3 I am hoping to implement a fear remover for the affected, through the aura. Technically there is already one, as you may have noted that a lot of people report that their presence has a significantly disinhibiting effect on those they're attracted to. But that can't happen if the user is too afraid to execute, and that effect has to be strengthened considerably. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 06-09-2020 (06-09-2020, 10:44 AM)Zubrowka Wrote:(06-09-2020, 08:37 AM)Shannon Wrote: You're basing your judgements on assumptions that may not have any correlation, and probably do not. The science of genetic editing, etc. is doing their thing very differently than how I am doing it. What holds for them, may not hold for my approach. What you don't know is that I can find and avoid those pitfalls using my models. That is exactly what I have been doing. There is nobody who understands how to influence your genes better than your own subconscious, because it's in charge of regulating them every day. Properly communicating what the goal is is the key. I don't attempt to tell the subconscious how to achieve the goal, because it understands that better than I do. I give it the goal and phrase the scripting such that no side effects, unintended consequences or damage are possible. In MHS, the genetic and epigenetic adjustment is aimed at healing your body, and removing any genetic or epigenetic code that causes disease. If you could remove a genetic propensity for Tay-Sachs disease from your genetic code, you would want to. Even if you don't have it, you don't want to pass that down to your children or your grandchildren. And if removing that risk can be done, and can be done without negatively impacting anything else, then there is no reason not to do it. Especially if it could potentially improve your own quality of life, and possibly even save your life. Your genes are being adjusted all the time. Parts are being turned on, and parts are being turned off. It is being copied and sometimes errors are introduced. Sometimes, those copy errors are good effects, and sometimes they are detrimental. If MHS can do anything with genetic or epigenetic alteration at all, it is designed to be unable to do anything that would have any negative impact, any unintended effects or any side effects. Most subliminals will not even benefit from introducing this sort of thing. But rest assured, if there was any negative, we would have had it reported by now from users of MHS. I used it myself before releasing it. That's how confident I was (and am) that it is safe. And you know what? It's the ONLY thing I have found that makes my lungs better. So you don't need to worry. You get far more risk from ambient radiation from the sun and the earth, and from intentionally and unintentionally ingested chemicals. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Zubrowka - 06-10-2020 Thanks for the elaboration. Appreciate it. I have a friend who have experienced burn out - what subliminal would you recommend for someone in her position? E3? ARA? In my experience burn out come from stress and you need something to help you relax, so I think that ARA would maybe be a good choice. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 06-10-2020 (06-10-2020, 05:21 AM)Zubrowka Wrote: Thanks for the elaboration. Appreciate it. Burnout comes from stress, yes, but what does the stress come from? There is some belief that causes it. ARA does not change the underlying belief, which means it will help relieve stress, but not fix the problem. E3 has the potential to fix the problem. So does LTU. LTU includes ARA. DRS may help also, depending on the cause of the stress that led to the burnout. So if she can't or doesn't want to get LTU, I suggest E3, and using ARA as needed. |