![]() |
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Jakeb203 - 03-09-2016 Limitless is of course a good idea. Of course you would enjoy the benefit of having every women attracted to you. But would you love it if you have all your cousins want to sleep with you, and all gay guys pinching your butt very time tou walk by? It fuckin' grosses me out and quite regularly this happens. I love women, but I don't want to attract my cousins. And I need to see them often each year, just like all of you need to see your family too. You cannot neglect realistic issues here. If you were talking about "free will", "make your own decisions", that sounds too good as if you have zero attachment with your family. it's funny how you all have this "limitless" mentality without focusing on realistic measures. I am simply saying that "make SM / AM filter out women who are close family members" , period. I don't give a shit if you sleep with random Cougars on the street. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Breeze - 03-09-2016 (03-09-2016, 08:55 AM)Jakeb203 Wrote: Limitless is of course a good idea. Of course you would enjoy the benefit of having every women attracted to you. But would you love it if you have all your cousins want to sleep with you, and all gay guys pinching your butt very time tou walk by? It fuckin' grosses me out and quite regularly this happens. I had a cousin attracted to me during AM 6, she even offered to spend a night in a hotel room. I said, "No." And that was that. If your cousins are attracted, or make you an offer, say no and continue your merry way. It is simple. It is your choice to let it bother you or not. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - rayrocanaldo - 03-09-2016 Is TLAM getting an upgrade to 5g ? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 03-09-2016 (03-09-2016, 09:48 AM)rayrocanaldo Wrote: Is TLAM getting an upgrade to 5g ? Eventually. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 03-09-2016 (03-09-2016, 08:55 AM)Jakeb203 Wrote: Limitless is of course a good idea. Of course you would enjoy the benefit of having every women attracted to you. But would you love it if you have all your cousins want to sleep with you, and all gay guys pinching your butt very time tou walk by? It fuckin' grosses me out and quite regularly this happens. An attractive, self realized man is going to have to deal with those terrible first-world problems they have about being an attractive self realized man. Limitless means you take responsibility for the freedoms you have. In this case, all you have to do is set a boundary, and you're done. Take it as a compliment that they are attracted, but set your boundaries firmly and then hold your ground. Simple. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Dzemoo - 03-09-2016 I would fuck a distant relative if shes hot and it doesnt come out. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - rayrocanaldo - 03-09-2016 How much more effective will future subliminals be at external manifestations ? Will manifesting friends, money, an amazing life, better body, etc....easier ? Most of our favorite subliminals are heavily focused on internal & self changes. I'd love to see some heavily focused on external ( reality, circumstances, lifestyle ) changes. Thats what we ultimately seek. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Benjamin - 03-09-2016 I personally don't like the thought of it limiting all kinds of things, where does the limitation stop? Is it that difficult not to fuck all your cousins? haha RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Nox - 03-09-2016 (03-09-2016, 04:25 PM)Benjamin Wrote: I personally don't like the thought of it limiting all kinds of things, where does the limitation stop? Is it that difficult not to **** all your cousins? haha Maybe he has a hot family. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Benjamin - 03-09-2016 hahaha RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Bliss - 03-09-2016 (03-09-2016, 04:25 PM)Benjamin Wrote: I personally don't like the thought of it limiting all kinds of things, where does the limitation stop? Is it that difficult not to **** all your cousins? haha Lol I agree RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 03-09-2016 (03-09-2016, 12:27 PM)rayrocanaldo Wrote: How much more effective will future subliminals be at external manifestations ? Will manifesting friends, money, an amazing life, better body, etc....easier ? Most of our favorite subliminals are heavily focused on internal & self changes. I'd love to see some heavily focused on external ( reality, circumstances, lifestyle ) changes. Thats what we ultimately seek. That remains to be seen, doesn't it. I can't magically know ahead of time with enough accuracy to be able to say, "Oh, 173.985% more effective." RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Spareness - 03-09-2016 (03-08-2016, 03:47 AM)sushi521 Wrote:(03-07-2016, 10:56 PM)Shannon Wrote:(03-07-2016, 09:43 PM)FrostedFake Wrote: Shannon do you think it would benefit me if I bought more high quality speakers? I'm already getting results so I know my speakers are working but they're laptop speakers from 2006 so Idk maybe I could do better lol. Audacity is indeed at first glance looks a bit complicated. But the truth is as simple and easy as any other media player. The difference is in the Audacity audio plays using shortcuts rather than the mouse. Maybe it's to make easier for users, (perhaps) because actually Audacity is a sound editor. Try to read the manual on how to use Audacity to play audio. After using Audacity a few times it will become second nature to play audio using Audacity. I myself am a little surprised because it is very easy and simple. The drawback is Audacity eat quite a lot of RAM and will lag on my computer. So I prefer to use VLC when I'm using Windows. I most often use Audacity when I'm using Linux. What I like about Audacity is due to differences in how to play the audio in Audacity and also due to some reasons. ![]() VLC is great because it is multifunctional, as well as simple as Audacity, can be minimized to the system tray and also consumes less RAM than Audacity. If you are using a computer that has a relatively low specification, try using Audacious. It is the default audio player in Lubuntu. Very light. I've tried it and so far so good. Its a bit I do not like is the part that I think the volume slider is less user-friendly. You can also install it on Windows. This audio player has never been tested by Shannon. So it's your own risk, to give it a try. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Dubls - 03-09-2016 Anybody use iTunes for playback on a Mac? Didn't hear any distortion in the speaker test off of built-in Mac speakers |