+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Thread-Vol-8)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - MD81 - 01-29-2025
Congratulations, Shannon, on reaching the new milestone. We are on track for phenomenal results, and all the waiting will pay off. It's a new era, and I am looking forward to it!
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - kserenyi - 01-29-2025
Congratulations on 6G! I just purchased the program - are there going to be volume instructions with 6G programs or should we just go with a comfortable volume?
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - Bignoise - 01-29-2025
Congratulations on the release. Lately you very well know what your clients want and my wallet is struggling .
I have a couple of questions about DRS 6G:
- There are no instructions about the volume. Did you forget it or is the general "use the masked one to adjust, then the ultrasonic" ?
- So, the stand-alone usage is 55 minutes, when 1 loop is 60 minutes. Seriously?
This seems easy unless you want to use it in a playlist with silent tracks and so.... So, do those 5 minutes really matter?
If it matters.... I have read the guidelines about not modifying the subs, convert to MP3, etc. I really understand them and why. I do know a little about digital audio and such.
But if I execute
Code:
ffmpeg -i Directional_Reflection_Shield_6G_Ultrasonic_\(Silent\).flac -ss 300 DRS_6G_Ultrasonic_55m.flacSo this command "cuts" the first 5 minutes (5x60 sec = 300) and don't modify anything else.
Thank you in advance,.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - jeromehansa - 01-29-2025
(01-26-2025, 10:33 AM)Shannon Wrote:(01-26-2025, 09:15 AM)jeromehansa Wrote: I have the same question regarding subliminals. Please do not take offense. Perhaps what he meant (and what I wanted to ask) is what is the difference in specifications between your old version of subliminal to the new one, which is 5G, 5.5G, 5.75G to 6G? What are the special things that are present in the 6G version, and what are the other things that are special compared to the simple subliminals that are made by many people, or explained through youtube and books, and the many subliminal creators out there? Is 6G a refinement of manifestation in terms of energy, concept, or something else? Perhaps many people would also like to know more details about this.
In addition: I think it's pretty clear that everyone is quality-oriented and people will never spend or use their money on something that doesn't have a good, comparable quality. I think it's normal that people will ask about the products that are being sold and people will think twice to consider doing anything.
I was not taking offense to your previous inquiry. I was stating facts. I have a very limited amount of time to even do my job these days and I can't spend it answering questions that don't apply to what the forum is about. During December 2024 and January 2025, my work load was 3x to 4x my usual work load, which isn't exactly light to begin with. Nearly impossible, but I don't have a choice.
6G differs from previous generation subliminals, right on up to 5.11G, in that it is significantly more advanced scripting methods, significantly more advanced metascripting methods, much higher information density and more precise build requirements. It is sporting additions to the 6G Skeleton Script that make it significantly better at dealing with resistance, as well as working faster, better and being much more transparent.
The more advanced scripting methods make for much more effective, efficient, successful and useful scripting. The adjustments to the skeleton script in 6G mean that it is much easier and faster for me to build a title in 6G while at the same time making it much more high impact, more powerful and extremely transparent. By transparent, I mean you don't feel the subliminal as much when you play it. My goal is "Press play, get results."
Higher impact means it has more effect when you listen to it, and is more effective at dealing with certain types of resistance. More power means it is more effective at getting through things like fear, lack of motivation and certain other types of resistance. More efficient scripting means you get significantly more words per second input than ever before. Improved scripting methods means the script is much more easily and readily accepted and acted on, instead of being resisted. Script additions to the skeleton script make resistance much less likely, and round off rough edges that 5.11G and earlier had. They also make for better execution and achievement of the program goals.
Script optimizations not only pack more effect into less script, they also make each statement much more successful in achieving their goals.
There's a lot to 6G as an upgrade from even 5.11G. I have been trying to keep quiet about it to prevent hype, so that you guys can see for yourselves, instead of advertising.
Beyond that, you'll have to use it and see what it's like and how it compares to the other options out there.
Yeah it's true, of course everyone wants the best, so they can't just stick to one place, because every thing is an opportunity to be better.
I found that your message is intriguing. I just found that morphic fields works on energy too (even can change physically). Beside that, subliminal goes in different ways that doesn't mean more good or bad than morphic fields. I believe right now that everything is good. And yeah I have seen many products including morphic fields, as well as subliminals, that most of them have 15mins only on their products that some I have tried that are based on energy, spiritual and still see further about many other producers and how the concept is done. But pretty sure that the forum here is also good and unique, have different energy.
I'm sure that you will do your best too in your works and congratulations on that.
As a person, of course everyone wants the best for each of them, including me, and others, as we are just human and everyone want to be better (as their self-concept in the end). As buyers and sellers, each knows that for sure the reason why all people need the self concept of theirs.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - Shannon - 01-29-2025
(01-29-2025, 02:57 AM)kserenyi Wrote: Congratulations on 6G! I just purchased the program - are there going to be volume instructions with 6G programs or should we just go with a comfortable volume?
*facepalm*
I forgot to finish calculating volume in my exhaustion.
For now use a volume of 5/15 on Android, 6/16 on Apple and whatever percentage that is on other phones.
I'll be finishing that up shortly.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - Shannon - 01-29-2025
(01-29-2025, 04:22 AM)Bignoise Wrote: Congratulations on the release. Lately you very well know what your clients want and my wallet is struggling .
I have a couple of questions about DRS 6G:
- There are no instructions about the volume. Did you forget it or is the general "use the masked one to adjust, then the ultrasonic" ?
- So, the stand-alone usage is 55 minutes, when 1 loop is 60 minutes. Seriously?
If it matters.... I have read the guidelines about not modifying the subs, convert to MP3, etc. I really understand them and why. I do know a little about digital audio and such.
But if I execute
being FLAC a lossless format, I'm doing something wrong? Am I "breaking" something?Code:ffmpeg -i Directional_Reflection_Shield_6G_Ultrasonic_\(Silent\).flac -ss 300 DRS_6G_Ultrasonic_55m.flac
So this command "cuts" the first 5 minutes (5x60 sec = 300) and don't modify anything else.
Thank you in advance,.
As stated in the post above, forgot volume. I spent so much time making sure the program was perfect in time for the end of the month, and calculating the other things that I had to push too far with exhaustion to get it out this month, and forgot the volume. lol The above post gives guidelines until I can finish modeling it.
As to usage time... yes, I know, 55 minutes is awkward. I also know that that is what came out of the models for producing the best results, and the spike at 55 minutes was far outpacing the data points that came back for the options to either side.. So yes, it matters.
You should never modify what I have done because A) then I cannot guarantee you have a valid subliminal and B) that invalidates the refund policy. Naturally I don't know what is what on your computer or what could go wrong. FLAC is lossless, but is there something happening behind the scenes that is assuming what you wanted? I can't know that.
You can try this, but if I was going to suggest cutting audio, I would say always cut from the end, and never from the beginning of a subliminal I made. If you're cool with the risk and not being eligible for a refund, feel free.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - Shannon - 01-29-2025
Tweak:
For now use a volume of 5/15 on Android, 6/16 on Apple and whatever percentage that is on other phones.
More coming as I have the information.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - Shannon - 01-29-2025
@jeromehansa
Please read through our rules and find the one your last post violates, and then correct your last post, please.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - Ampersnd - 01-29-2025
Good afternoon everyone, and congratulations to Shannon for your first 6G release.
I remember in September of 2013 when I was 21, skateboarding around town while listening to the 5G version of Absolute Self-Confidence; that was the cutting-edge at the time. Look at how far you've taken this technology!
If I've understood correctly from passively watching the forums, the subliminals of this new generation are:
* Easier and faster to develop
* Circumvent resistance, often without tripping up conscious alarms
* 10$ a month more than 5.11G
* Out before GTA 6
This is all amazing news. Shannon, I look forward to the catalogue that will develop through 2025, after some long-needed rest and reflection, of course.
I'm in favor of any money-based 6G you can make.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - Shannon - 01-29-2025
(01-29-2025, 10:22 AM)Ampersnd Wrote: Good afternoon everyone, and congratulations to Shannon for your first 6G release.
I remember in September of 2013 when I was 21, skateboarding around town while listening to the 5G version of Absolute Self-Confidence; that was the cutting-edge at the time. Look at how far you've taken this technology!
If I've understood correctly from passively watching the forums, the subliminals of this new generation are:
* Easier and faster to develop
* Circumvent resistance, often without tripping up conscious alarms
* 10$ a month more than 5.11G
* Out before GTA 6
This is all amazing news. Shannon, I look forward to the catalogue that will develop through 2025, after some long-needed rest and reflection, of course.
I'm in favor of any money-based 6G you can make.
As to resistance, to be more specific:
What we have seen so far after testing 6G-Alpha, Beta and Final is as follows.
Resistance is significantly less likely. When and where it does appear, it is much less consciously obvious or uncomfortable. The new technology seems to get through it quickly, with execution starting before it is finished being overcome.
Keep in mind that we have effectively had relatively little time to explore this aspect of 6G, so I don't really have a lot of knowledge about it yet. The priority has been on getting the development tested and verified for safety and effectiveness, and then getting it optimized and ready for publication.
There was a pattern developing in that no matter what I accomplished, I was always finding myself thinking I needed "three more months to finish it". After a while, I recognized this as an endless delay tactic by some part of me, and decided definitively that I would do whatever was necessary to get 6G Final finished and published for the first time by the end of January 2025. It was originally supposed to be finished and published in September of 2024. Then October, then November, then December. That's when I saw the pattern and decided that come Hell or high water, I was going to publish it in January.
Now 6G Final has been finished and published. We can now work on discovering the more subtle nuances of how 6G deals with resistance for a wider variety of personality types. But from what I have seen across five different testers, it is MUCH better at executing without triggering resistance, and MUCH better and faster at dealing with resistance.
I'm trying to keep the subscription price as low as possible to maximize how many can access these programs.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - jeromehansa - 01-29-2025
(01-29-2025, 09:56 AM)Shannon Wrote: @jeromehansa
Please read through our rules and find the one your last post violates, and then correct your last post, please.
Hi Shannon, where I can find the rules? Im sorry I can't find it.
Anyway, I'm just being transparent and honest. I don't know if it's not good for you, but I look positive in everything.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - Benjamin - 01-29-2025
(01-29-2025, 07:00 PM)jeromehansa Wrote:(01-29-2025, 09:56 AM)Shannon Wrote: @jeromehansa
Please read through our rules and find the one your last post violates, and then correct your last post, please.
Hi Shannon, where I can find the rules? Im sorry I can't find it.
Anyway, I'm just being transparent and honest. I don't know if it's not good for you, but I look positive in everything.
It may be a language barrier, but i'm noticing a tendency of you trying to act like Shannon has an issue for pointing certain things out.
The rules are at https://subliminal-talk.com/Thread-Forum-Rules?pid=224673#pid224673
Specifically for your post is point number 2. Usually I would edit it, but I haven't this time so we can make you aware.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - jeromehansa - 01-29-2025
(01-29-2025, 09:24 PM)Benjamin Wrote:(01-29-2025, 07:00 PM)jeromehansa Wrote: Hi Shannon, where I can find the rules? Im sorry I can't find it.
Anyway, I'm just being transparent and honest. I don't know if it's not good for you, but I look positive in everything.
It may be a language barrier, but i'm noticing a tendency of you trying to act like Shannon has an issue for pointing certain things out.
The rules are at https://subliminal-talk.com/Thread-Forum-Rules?pid=224673#pid224673
Specifically for your post is point number 2. Usually I would edit it, but I haven't this time so we can make you aware.
Hi @Benjamin Thanks for the sharing of the rules that Shannon made. I just read it and the point number 2 shows that everyone is prohibited from mentioning other producers. I just know that. I said it as it is before because Shannon said that people have to use his products and how it compares to the other options out there, so I explained that I use lots of producers out there that I also use their products and I will choose the best as a comparison from many producers. It's not only me, but all people out there are really need to shape their own self-concept to make better person and lives. Because in essence, the function of subliminal itself is to become the best version of ourselves (our self-concept).
And please I mean no harm to anyone. I'm not pretending or doing anything negative. Im being genuine. I'm being myself. Please don't misunderstand me. I don't even know why my intentions suddenly changed when I had no negative intentions at all. But after reading rule number 2, I have deleted the example of the producers I used.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - jeromehansa - 01-30-2025
(01-29-2025, 09:24 PM)Benjamin Wrote:(01-29-2025, 07:00 PM)jeromehansa Wrote: Hi Shannon, where I can find the rules? Im sorry I can't find it.
Anyway, I'm just being transparent and honest. I don't know if it's not good for you, but I look positive in everything.
It may be a language barrier, but i'm noticing a tendency of you trying to act like Shannon has an issue for pointing certain things out.
The rules are at https://subliminal-talk.com/Thread-Forum-Rules?pid=224673#pid224673
Specifically for your post is point number 2. Usually I would edit it, but I haven't this time so we can make you aware.
But if you said that Shannon has an issue for pointing certain things out, I would like to know too, as like what you said