Subliminal Talk

Full Version: Jordan Peterson
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3
(03-01-2019, 01:59 PM)Have at ye Wrote: [ -> ]https://www.thestar.com/entertainment/20...entre.html

I hope there's going to be a live stream of this somewhere, I wanna watch. Big Grin

My prediction? Zizek by KO. There's levels to this game, Peterson ain't even a contender. Wink

Interesting, will definitely watch it!
Found a great interview with JBP

'Mysticism, Spirit and the Shadow' - Jordan Peterson interview part 1 (you'll find the link on YT)

Jordan Peterson - "Masculinity is not toxic" - part 2 of interview
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=szBKI9Eg0fE
Thanks, I needed something like the second video.. i'm sick of seeing that bs everywhere and even so called 'mens coaches' teaching men to be weaker.

Unfortunately though the first video goes against rule 4.
(03-21-2019, 07:53 PM)Benjamin Wrote: [ -> ]Thanks, I needed something like the second video.. i'm sick of seeing that bs everywhere and even so called 'mens coaches' teaching men to be weaker.

Unfortunately though the first video goes against rule 4.

Yeah I liked that part to. Men nhave the same need of empowerment as women do right now (and always in fact). I think JBP formulate his thoughts well on that subject.

I edited out the link, hope that's enough beeause it's a lot of good stuff in that video.
In light of the upcoming Peterson - Zizek fight (uh, I mean, debate Wink ), here's the "leftist" take on the issue: https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/tox...73096.html

They're actually and essentially in agreement on this particular point. Big Grin
(03-22-2019, 07:17 PM)Have at ye Wrote: [ -> ]In light of the upcoming Peterson - Zizek fight (uh, I mean, debate Wink ), here's the "leftist" take on the issue: https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/tox...73096.html

They're actually and essentially in agreement on this particular point. Big Grin

Interesting. Hope to see some fruitful discussions between the two of them about that to reach some consensus in the discussion.
I like Dr, Peterson and was big on following him for quite a bit. I don't listen to him much anymore, as I feel I got the general gist of what he preaches. Also I don't like being reminded how far from together my shit is.
(03-25-2019, 04:47 AM)Greenduck Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-22-2019, 07:17 PM)Have at ye Wrote: [ -> ]In light of the upcoming Peterson - Zizek fight (uh, I mean, debate Wink ), here's the "leftist" take on the issue: https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/tox...73096.html

They're actually and essentially in agreement on this particular point. Big Grin

Interesting. Hope to see some fruitful discussions between the two of them about that to reach some consensus in the discussion.

The debate was pretty fun. Entertaining and educational, lol. It went pretty much the way I though it would - these two are, essentially, in agreement on a great many things, but Zizek's been actually trying to pull a fast one on Peterson throughout to try and "broaden his horizons", so to speak, haha. He does that.

It was also very interesting to see how a hardcore Lacanian psychoanalyst (so Zizek) would try to discuss various psychological aspects of "happiness" with a clinical psychologist who likes to apply Jung's concepts in psychotherapy (so Peterson).

Interested parties can find it on youtube, just search for "Petereson vs Zizek".

Then again, if you know the works of these two, they did not come up with anything new during the debate, I believe.
Great video - love J.P. - actually got a chance to see him in person downtown here.  EPIC.

I used to be more engrossed in his works but I take it in smaller doses these days.

I'll pass this one along as it struck a deep chord lately.


Ok..........
If it discusses POLITICS it breaks the rules. You know that. Fix it.
You know this by now Zubrowka, Seriously your post is basically "I don't know if this breaks the rules on discussing politics, but here's a video that discusses politics."

It's been explained to you several times, quite clearly. So the only conclusion I can make is you're doing this on purpose. Next time you'll get a temp ban with no more warnings.
Pages: 1 2 3