(12-13-2021, 10:27 PM)CatMan Wrote: [ -> ]"Shannon's DMSI 3.5 Run"?
"It's here." in your personal journal.
Connection? Bit surprising.
*X Files Theme*
@
CatMan
Go to your account.
DMSI was upgraded for everyone to v3.5
(12-13-2021, 11:44 PM)Benjamin Wrote: [ -> ] (12-13-2021, 10:27 PM)CatMan Wrote: [ -> ]"Shannon's DMSI 3.5 Run"?
"It's here." in your personal journal.
Connection? Bit surprising.
*X Files Theme*
IT is here!
LOL!
My first thought was this classic:
![[Image: It-1990-Promotional-Poster.jpg]](https://i.ibb.co/s2zDYCN/It-1990-Promotional-Poster.jpg)
Day before yesterday, the last day I used DMSI 3.4, I went to a petting zoo after I ran my loop. Among the goats, cows and horse there was a Jenny there (female donkey) who was quickly and extremely interested. She actually tried to nibble my ears and literally turned around and presented to me twice, even going so far as to back into the fence while lifting her tail to make her intent extremely obvious. And she responded like that to nobody else who was there - just me. Very specifically. Apparently, an aura of sexual energy can potentially be detected and understood by some types of animals. This was in front of a friend and GF. More than a little disturbing. Good thing there was a fence to protect me!
Whenever I use DMSI 3.4, my cat MUST be touching me, on my lap or in my chair against my back at all times. On days I do not, he is happy to be in his usual place next to my chair on my laptop case, which he thinks is his special bed. He has been extra lovey ever since a couple days before I started using it. He's sitting on my desk next to my keyboard right now, just purring away. Not his usual.
Today I have not listened to anything. I have had some interesting results, however. On the way to dinner, I was in a lane at a stop light next to a turning lane. Because I frequently have to wait for the car in front of me to pull up to be able to get into a turning lane, I tend to try to be polite to the people behind me when I am next to a turning lane and I try to pull up as far as possible to make sure that that doesn't happen to anyone behind me. Tonight the guy in front of me kept pulling up and I would follow, and after doing this three times, he actually got out of his car, turned to me and gave me very aggressive body language, and got back in his car. This is almost exactly the same thing that RTB told me happened to him about an hour prior, except the guy behind him actually hit his bumper. I always maintain at least a couple feet distance when I do this.
When I got to the restaurant, I had the celebrity effect in full swing. Two different attractive female servers were clearly responding, and I also had two random senior citizens decide that they needed to talk to me.
It might have also affected a hostess and a cashier, not sure.
Hopefully the additions to DMSI v3.5 will prevent some of the negative stuff and interest from animals. The donkey got me thinking, though. The animal handler said that animals do that when they are aroused and attracted to someone or something, and it's just an expression of instincts. Maybe that is a show of what effects DMSI has when there are absolutely no filters?
Almost forgot. GF has reported beng more aroused than usual on a couple of occasions, but so far every time it happens, we are too busy working or in a bad mood from something else having gone wrong. She tried to initiate once, but I had just discovered the reason I had to build 3.5, and I was super upset. That killed it.
She wanted you to turn it into a heavy petting zoo
C'mon.... that was a tacky ass joke....now all the mules are gonna be all offended coz they werent included.Ha Ha. good one Ben!! ha.
Not sure why, but my first loop of 3.5 was even exhausting me for three hours before I ran it. By the time I turned it on I couldn't stay awake any longer. Had a hard time waking up 3 hours later, but once I was awake, it wasn't so bad. I wonder what's going on.
So DMSI has had a noticeable effect on me and GF. It's definitely arousing her more and causing her to be more easily aroused and more open to, more willing for and more focused on sex. She's also much more likely to initiate and or make it happen than usual. It has also had the effect of acting as an orgasm enhancer, and that is for both of us. It also seems to reduce my refractory time and make me much more interested in going again.
I'm enjoying the effects it has so far. Listening to my second loop of 3.5, no exhaustion this time.
Based on what I am experiencing, I would say that sufficient execution will result in people becoming weapons of mass sexual destruction. No wonder I'm limited to 2 cycles! Definitely have to consider doing a DMSI for couples sooner than later.
@
Shannon
You are playing dmsi 3.5 on your Android phone at 13/15 in the US format correct?
(12-13-2021, 12:52 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (12-12-2021, 07:40 PM)HMoody Wrote: [ -> ] (12-11-2021, 11:57 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]By the way, when you run this thing, always remember that it is designed to weed out people who:
- Are not free to have sex with you.
- Are underage in your jurisdiction.
- Cannot legally consent to sex in your jurisdiction.
- Cannot have sex with you without causing harm to themselves or anyone else.
This will weed out a lot of opportunities you might want to take. Don't assume you aren't getting results; it's just DMSI protecting you from bad situations. This means that when you do get results, DMSI should have a LOT more energy to use to help things go your way. Just wait until you encounter that 8-9-10 who is free and clear.
I'm about 54 minutes into my first loop and starting to get tired. This started at about 50 minutes. I started running it right after having lunch, so I have enough food. It must be projecting more energy than I can easily source.
When this is finished, I'm going to go to the bookstore and read for a while, and see if anyone responds.
I'm curious about Point 4 and what constitutes harm to themselves or anyone else? How is that defined? For example, If the attraction to you causes hurt feelings in someone else that likes them but is not dating them...Is that harmful? Or let's say they were looking to leave a relationship anyways and attraction to you gives them that final push to do so. In a sense it harms their current partner as well as themselves because breakups are usually painful to one or both parties. Does that mean the DMSI would not target them? A lot of things can be considered harmful depending on point of view...so I'm curious as to where the line is drawn in regards to the program.
Harm to themselves or anyone else is self defined. I cannot offer a more specific definition than you can, everyone is different, and every situation is different. So my best effort to prevent DMSI from causing cheating, breaking up relationships and families is to include this. You draw the line.
I'm guessing this is harm is defined at a subconscious level? I understand your intent but did wonder if that might not be perceived as a way not to execute by the resistant parts. Sort of an excuse since it does seem so open-ended.
