(10-03-2019, 11:34 AM)AlphaRomeo Wrote: [ -> ] (10-03-2019, 11:03 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]Stop fiddling around with one or two loops at a time then. I'm relatively certain that the reason the models indicated 1 loop and then 7 days off was because the step up was so big and people would need to get used to it, and because we would need to see how long bloom should last.
If you want to overpower DMSI, you're going to have to get serious. Even then it's going to take a while.
Try 6-8 loops for 1-3 days on and then 5 days off.
This is the first time I remember when your comment does not make sense, or if it does I have to be mind reader to more or less extend. Maybe its language barrier for me that slightly confuses the message.
If UMS is so powerful, how come DOUBLING the number of loops is considered "fiddling". I had no way of knowing, which is why I asked you. I also had no way of knowing exactly how much more powerful DMSI is. How is model indication of UMS relative to my question? Before my mistake, 7 days off worked better than less days off (not 5, or 4), for me. Also, 1 loop per day has been working fine as my post about how I felt just before the mistake indicates, I never needed feel for 6-8 loops as others have been doing, which is why I didnt do it in these past three days either but instead doubled the loops.
Asking you for advice is not serious?
Yes, I made a mistake, and no, Im not gonna dwell on it. Instead, the best course of action is to take best course of action, which is why I asked your advice. In this case, "Try 6-8 loops for 1-3 days on and then 5 days off", would have been enough, instead of comments about fiddling and accusing me of not being serious.
Thank you for the advice tho.
First, I'd like to say that I'm not trying to come down on you. If it sounded like that, my apologies. Today has been a day spent doing things I would much rather not have done, and I have had virtually no chance to work because of it. It's had me frustrated.
DMSI is significantly more powerful than UMS, as you may have noticed. They are also both carriers of the tech designed to allow you to run two programs at a time. If you want UMS to overpower DMSI, you have to use it to a degree that will exceed the power of DMSI. One or two loops at a time isn't going to do that. If you want UMS to dominate, then that's what you'll want to do. If you want to stay with 1-2 loops, then you'll have to wait a while as DMSI runs out of steam.
@
Shannon , apology accepted. I may have also been more sensitive than usually, due the turbulence. One of the symptoms it has caused is disturbing my sleeping pattern. I find difficult to sleep my normal 8h of sleep straight, and the total amount of sleep per day has decreased. I will monitor if this gets better as DMSI runs out of steam.
Few other things as well that may or may not be because of turbulence. Increased headache, and pain in eyes. Headache is not really that serious, and I can handle it well, but eyes worries me more. I have had dry eyes few months before it, to which I have had balancing eye drops and I noticed them started to get much better in days before DMSI. Now after the DMSI mistake they got worse right after the loops. Aside from being dry, there might be increased pressure specifically on them, and possibly in whole head. I have not yet gone to see eye specialist to measure the pressure as it may be just the dryness that irritates them. I will increase the use of eye drops in order to balance the dryness. I will monitor this as well.
Any thoughts regarding my eyes, sleeping problem, headache, and if they truly are DMSI related and if I should do something with it aside from conventional medical care such as eye drops?
Aside from all that, I have sensitive ears again and listening extra loops seems to make it worse and possibly increase pressure in head so I will wait DMSI run out of steam and use UMS as in regular pattern.
Maybe it would be a good idea under those circumstances to take a break from all subs for a week? That should help with the pain.
As you can see, DMSI is incredibly powerful, and the technology to allow using 2 programs at once is not finished being developed...
(10-04-2019, 07:46 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]Maybe it would be a good idea under those circumstances to take a break from all subs for a week? That should help with the pain.
As you can see, DMSI is incredibly powerful, and the technology to allow using 2 programs at once is not finished being developed...
Ok. Thanks for the fast reply, appreciated. I was about to say if I should take a break as well...so break it is.
Yes, DMSI does not seem to be a joke...only one day of listening and all this crazy stuff. Those who are fully on it and listening only it as per instructions are for a wild ride, I could imagine. Cant wait for UMS2 if its going to be as powerful or more.
Yes, 5.75G is finally putting me within sight of what I wanted my programs to do all along. It won't be too terribly far to 6G now.
Cycle 12, day 3 on. So this is basically 3.th regular/normal cycle after the DMSI mistake which set me to week or two of turbulence (which f-ed up my schedule with UMS a bit).
I dont have much to report which is why I have been silent these last few weeks. This is the last day of 1 loop /3 days/ 7 days off regime. Seems not enough is happening with this schedule and my gut tells me to instead of doing 1 loop for 3 days to listen 3 loops 1 day, then take less than 7 days off. I may test 1 day of 6 days off to add more routine to my days. One of the possible reasons that Im not financially anywhere near as successful as I want to be is lack of routine. If 1 days on 6 days off works well it would also fall nicely into weekly routine, starting each week with UMS at monday morning, getting motivated to work the week,starting 11.1.1.2019. This is my intuition, I may need to adjust the schedule to less days off but I will try this for the next few weeks and see how it goes. Cant be worse than now, as like mentioned, not much happening.
Ok, stopped using UMS some time ago, after giving it 6+ months try.
Looking forward to UMS2 later next year to see if Im able to have it work better. With current version it seemed it was too much of exposure (in which case I manifested some reverse results in both times), or too little (in which case not much external changes happened). I found it difficult to find sufficient usage pattern, or being patient enough to continue to run it after 6 moths. Maybe I subconscious boredom or something. Having that said, some internal shifts has definitely happened that makes me closer to be the kind of person who can and does manifest, by taking right kind of action and being in right kind of state, of what UMS is trying to achieve. Money has also shifted higher in my value hierarchy, meaning that I allocated more time and energy to it in my daily life. I am figuring best ways to make money, I am more open to learn new things in order to make more money etc. Some of the learning and benefits from UMS will probably continue to increase as I continue on my path. Anyway, I may write more extended a summary of the run at some point.
I am probably switching back to MLS for 6, 9 or 12 months (unless MHS will meet my criteria on specific issue I asked on Shannon Journal) after , I think, 18 months or so. Back then I had just finished 9month(ish) daily run of MLS, just before Shannon announced 1:1 secondary ratio. Lets see how MLS runs this time with days off included in the usage. May or may not start a journal on that.