07-25-2013, 07:13 PM
(07-25-2013, 06:31 PM)ohmygee Wrote: Lets eliminate subs to make this choice easier. Since AM6/SM3 arn't built yet, their out. Since AM5 is the mandatory foundation for WM2 or SM2, its out.
Well I'd rather keep them in since SM3 will most likely have OGSF, and AM 6.0 has OGSF as well. I'm sorry but I think that addition alone will make dramatic changes to the frequency of results reported.
Am 5 can be eliminated, you're right, but let's also look to the future. It may be that neither program "does it all" but a new one like SM3 (with OGSF) would. See what I'm getting at?
As for me, I can't start another sub till sometime in October I believe, so I have to look to the future anyhow.
(07-25-2013, 06:31 PM)ohmygee Wrote: Now if you read the product description both products are essentially the same on the SURFACE. The key difference being SM2 is more sexually agressive, and WM2 is more social/flirty, please correct me if I'm wrong.
Now I say "on the surface", just because it says it on the sales page one thing doesn't mean its how you'll be when you finish the set. I'm speaking fro experience, and I know many people on the forum have noticed the same thing. Does it mean the sub is bad? No. It just means its jam packed, and you'll likely not receive the full benefits in one run. Thats why its constantly preached to guys that run AMx subs they'll have to run it 2-3x.
It's jam packed yet...
(07-25-2013, 06:31 PM)ohmygee Wrote: Also WM2 is 5G, and SM2 is 4G. WM2 has a sh*t TON more "features" then SM2!
I must admit I'm confused here, which is jammed packed, WM2 or SM2?
(07-25-2013, 06:31 PM)ohmygee Wrote: WM2 is a superior product by far. Until SM3 is released, and there are a couple journals. If sex is the goal WM2 is the way to go.
And now I'm confused again. If sex is the goal, woman magnet is the way to go? How do you figure that?
(07-25-2013, 06:31 PM)ohmygee Wrote: I'm not just speaking from assumptions, I'm also basing this off of someone I know who ALSO got zero results from SM2. This isn't the person I'm refering too in post #41, that person ran SM2 twice, and got results the second time. But regardless he's constantly going out and approaching girls, he puts in the numbers. With or without SM2 I'm sure he'd get poon.
Ah yes, very relevant distinction. My own personal situation is not so "numbers friendly", and am definitely looking for a sub that can take me to the social freedom and DESIRE to act on it as well.
(07-25-2013, 06:31 PM)ohmygee Wrote: As for the guy that ran SM2 and got no lays. He then ran WM2 after AM5 and went on to have quite a few lays, and no approach anxiety. He calls it social freedom. I know for a fact my friend on SM2 does not have social freedom. He's comfortable in environments, but he likely still has anxiety.
They may just be different people you know? Can you provide more details? What is the situation with the two guys?
I mean, I might be impressed if a guy putting in the numbers with women gets less results while on SM2 than a guy who had next to no experience with women and did NOT put in the numbers while on WM2. I mean, that would be definitive for sure. But right now, all I'm seeing are two different people having slightly different results.
So again, any details on the level/expertise of these two case studies?
(07-25-2013, 06:31 PM)ohmygee Wrote: Everything I've said isn't based off theory, its what I've experienced and seen in real life.
I'm not doubting that anymore, don't worry. My main concern now is if it's the subs or the individual men creating/not creating the results we're talking about.
