12-12-2018, 01:07 AM
(11-04-2013, 05:37 PM)Shannon Wrote: MIR is designed for short term use, no more than 10-13 days at a time. If you catch the infection early, it can really make the issue much less difficult and shorten it considerably. In one case, I had it killed completely in a couple hours. In another it only lasted 3-4 days, when everyone else who got it had it for literally weeks.
MIR is a special case. If you use MIR, it is intended to be used by itself while the infection is present and for three days after it appears to have ended. If you choose to use MIR it MUST have the whole stage. In my experiments, I found that it did have an effect when I tried to use it and BAMM together, but it was severely degraded and so was BAMM. So for those few days, I used it alone because I could not afford to be down for weeks. There was a price to pay otherwise, but it wasn't as much as if I had been down completely for weeks and still using BAMM. It was a judgement call.
If you judge that the cost of not using MIR is greater than the cost of using it, then use MIR. But use it 24/7 for as long as you have the infection and then for three days more. In some cases, that may actually require giving up something else and using only MIR for a significant amount of time, depending on the nature of the infection.
Hi Shannon, my question has to do with using MIR for a longer period. I am now on day 12 of MIR, and I am still mildly symptomatic. I seem to have had the worst cold of my life, or the worst I've had in memory. This is odd for me, as I don't generally get sick at all. Oh well!
What I am hoping you can explain to me, is if there is some outer limit on how long MIR will be helping me. Now on day 12, I still have some symptoms, and I am hoping that within another couple of days I'll be symptom free. Adding three more days to that would put me at 17 days of 24 hours/day use.
Any thoughts on the matter?
Thank you!
