Good points, again, Keith. But isn't that essentially just proving we're saying the same thing?
Consider. Person A resents Person B "for being wealthy". Person A comes into a huge amount of wealth, and now has the conflict of "I resent wealthy people" and "I am a wealthy people". You will never allow yourself to be what you resent, because it's difficult to resent yourself! So two things are therefore true:
Furthermore, coming into money this way - "chance" or inheritance - for someone who strongly resents wealth/the wealthy in such a manner that they would never become wealthy without this "chance" experience or inheritance, is more than likely experiencing a karmic lesson in appreciating wealth and understanding poverty! And as such, they do not need to be free of their resentment, as their resentment actually becomes the reason they must experience wealth in that case!
So really, we're saying the same thing in two different ways.
Consider. Person A resents Person B "for being wealthy". Person A comes into a huge amount of wealth, and now has the conflict of "I resent wealthy people" and "I am a wealthy people". You will never allow yourself to be what you resent, because it's difficult to resent yourself! So two things are therefore true:
- The person did not come into this wealth through their own decisions, motivation or actions: it was either chance (lotto, gambling, etc.) or it was inheritance.
- Unless they grasp the "lesson" of the situation and grow into it, they will subconsciously seek to return to a state of equilibrium as can be seen previous to the experience.
Furthermore, coming into money this way - "chance" or inheritance - for someone who strongly resents wealth/the wealthy in such a manner that they would never become wealthy without this "chance" experience or inheritance, is more than likely experiencing a karmic lesson in appreciating wealth and understanding poverty! And as such, they do not need to be free of their resentment, as their resentment actually becomes the reason they must experience wealth in that case!
So really, we're saying the same thing in two different ways.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!