05-03-2017, 10:46 AM
(This post was last modified: 05-04-2017, 04:09 AM by JackOfHearts.)
I think it's always good to express some doubts with everything you learn, it's
fun to share things with you. And I'm learning at the same time since I studied your chart a lot.
Here is your answer for astrology
http://subliminal-talk.com/newreply.php?tid=8008
But about Carl Jung, well I haven't studied him a lot, but I don't agree some of the things I read from him. And what is worse is that he believed astrology works as well, which would mean we should agree.
But I think he did a poor job and as of now his psychology seems obsolete to me, renowned or not, I don't really care, if what he said doesn't make sense I'm not going to praise him
I don't think he was the Nikola Tesla of psychology.
And the MBTI from I have read so far seems bent in a direction that doesn't reflect the reality to me, I do understand that it's more complicated that the 4 letters. What doesn't match to me are his definition of sensing, intuition, etc. For example in INTP or ENTP, the N stand for intuition.
I have a hard time imagining someone like described above using his intuition as his primary function or behavior or ability or even his secondary function. Unless you redefine the term intuition to begin with. The term intuition is commonly known to be something females use mainly. In astrology it's different though as it's basically your inspiration, your thought directly linked to the super subconscious mind that knows everything, I don't remember how it was term by Shannon exactly but I think it was " super subconscious mind" or something like that.
fun to share things with you. And I'm learning at the same time since I studied your chart a lot.
Here is your answer for astrology
http://subliminal-talk.com/newreply.php?tid=8008
But about Carl Jung, well I haven't studied him a lot, but I don't agree some of the things I read from him. And what is worse is that he believed astrology works as well, which would mean we should agree.
But I think he did a poor job and as of now his psychology seems obsolete to me, renowned or not, I don't really care, if what he said doesn't make sense I'm not going to praise him
I don't think he was the Nikola Tesla of psychology. And the MBTI from I have read so far seems bent in a direction that doesn't reflect the reality to me, I do understand that it's more complicated that the 4 letters. What doesn't match to me are his definition of sensing, intuition, etc. For example in INTP or ENTP, the N stand for intuition.
Quote:"ENTP PERSONALITY (“THE DEBATER”)
Follow the path of the unsafe, independent thinker. Expose your ideas to the dangers of controversy. Speak your mind and fear less the label of ’crack-pot’ than the stigma of conformity. And on issues that seem important to you, stand up and be counted at any cost."
https://www.16personalities.com/entp-personality
I have a hard time imagining someone like described above using his intuition as his primary function or behavior or ability or even his secondary function. Unless you redefine the term intuition to begin with. The term intuition is commonly known to be something females use mainly. In astrology it's different though as it's basically your inspiration, your thought directly linked to the super subconscious mind that knows everything, I don't remember how it was term by Shannon exactly but I think it was " super subconscious mind" or something like that.
