Hi Mini! So good to hear from the guy who inspired me to run SM3! My run hasn't gone nearly as well as yours did, hugely disappointing run...but anyway...
I've noticed the same things on many stages. Other stages I had activity until the end.
On the ones I "went dark" on after awhile, I have realisations early on, things are good, dreams etc. then a blank spot until the next stage generally where I just go through the motions. I think the reason for continuing the 32 day thing is to just accomodate those who are really messed up on programming and a worst case scenario, to allow an absolute avalanche of snowflakes to develop per stage to allow the most consistent level of change possible. It also would tend to allow longer term/permanent change. I also listen for an extremely high amount of hours, thus further facilitating the amount of snowflakes developed by an incredible margin compared to most. So, at times, my results on stages can be far more extreme as the stages I peak early on are VERY noticeable. Also, those dead spots could very well be times where the easy work for the sub is done, and it is currently working on a bigger issue that is resisting the sub. Hence the reason why Shannon says each of these multi-subs should be run 3 times generally, to get the most benefit from them. It makes sense to me, as everyone comes from a different place and different challenges to overcome and will need a good dose of snowflakes of every stage to have the program become the mind's dominant programming.
I'm not sure if much shorter stages would work better. Maybe in the future Shannon will change the 32 day rule or the multistages may even be converted to a single stage. Too many unknowns at this point.
It's some very interesting views though that I can corroborate at times. I'm not sure I'm balanced enough yet to say it's happened every time, as a few stages like I said have gone to the wire with stimulae.
I've noticed the same things on many stages. Other stages I had activity until the end.
On the ones I "went dark" on after awhile, I have realisations early on, things are good, dreams etc. then a blank spot until the next stage generally where I just go through the motions. I think the reason for continuing the 32 day thing is to just accomodate those who are really messed up on programming and a worst case scenario, to allow an absolute avalanche of snowflakes to develop per stage to allow the most consistent level of change possible. It also would tend to allow longer term/permanent change. I also listen for an extremely high amount of hours, thus further facilitating the amount of snowflakes developed by an incredible margin compared to most. So, at times, my results on stages can be far more extreme as the stages I peak early on are VERY noticeable. Also, those dead spots could very well be times where the easy work for the sub is done, and it is currently working on a bigger issue that is resisting the sub. Hence the reason why Shannon says each of these multi-subs should be run 3 times generally, to get the most benefit from them. It makes sense to me, as everyone comes from a different place and different challenges to overcome and will need a good dose of snowflakes of every stage to have the program become the mind's dominant programming.
I'm not sure if much shorter stages would work better. Maybe in the future Shannon will change the 32 day rule or the multistages may even be converted to a single stage. Too many unknowns at this point.
It's some very interesting views though that I can corroborate at times. I'm not sure I'm balanced enough yet to say it's happened every time, as a few stages like I said have gone to the wire with stimulae.
