(04-13-2017, 03:12 PM)maxx55 Wrote:(04-13-2017, 02:42 PM)CatMan Wrote: Yeah, you've read way into those words he said. He was saying that in the context of using only one method of mind programming at once, meaning use DMSI, OR that course thing you talked about, not both. So to paraphrase, he meant that if you feel something ELSE would be better, to go do it, not do both. Nothing about him doubting DMSI or you...just to stick to one thing at time so you know what works and doesn't work. And so you can provide relevant useful feedback since DMSI is the only variable.
And yes, 2 loops of A is likely far better than any other number. He uses that number for the instructions, so it's probably the best way to go.
Are you sure about that? I went to look for that post to re-read it for myself, but couldn't find it. All I remember is that I did take it to mean that he didn't think DMSI would help.
I may have misinterpreted it then. That was the whole reason I decided to start experimenting different numbers of loops.
Yes I am.
You talked to him about it in this journal I think, and in the discussion thread where you brought up other stuff related to it again.
Come on, man, you know he wouldn't say flat out it wouldn't work on you and to give up or whatever. That isn't his style at all. It was around the time you wanted him to do some model stuff on if it would ever work for you. Which is of course ultimately impossible to magically "predict", from afar, given almost no real information to judge, and as the program advances the "chance" it can work changes also. And if given time, it absolutely can, in reality only one real way to find out. When you weren't happy with his answer, and said you wanted to look at doing something else, that's when he said the words discussed, that you can go do something else if you feel it'd be faster or better, or stick with DMSI. But not to do both, because you won't know what is effective and what isn't, and wouldn't be able to give actionable info to advance development. I understand things can be misunderstood, but I'm surprised this was, as it seemed clear. But I hope it is now. In fact, I'm pretty sure I remember PM'ing with you back and forth about it.
You are 100% getting results from Version A, posts like the one earlier are massive proof of that. My advice, back off to 2 loops of Version A, at a good volume, preferably headphones and hybrid. And NOTHING else, don't over complicate things. "Too many cooks in the kitchen." is a phrase that comes to mind. If I can feel tangible internal shifts with V3.1, anyone else here can that isn't named Swisston as we are considered the "resisters". And even HE is showing signs of punching through. V3.0.1 caused me a lot of strife that guys are feeling now on V3.1. So much so, that I've wondered if I'm a real "resister" at all, as I'm ahead of the game here now it seems, because V3.1 has been a breeze for me, absolute breeze. Interesting revelation.
You're changing man. Trust me, I see it, I wrote posts like that during V3.0.1 and earlier. Not so much now that I've navigated the internal "storms" I think, already. Stick with it. In time, you can too.
