DMSI 3.3.2, OED, X124, PSEv3, etc.

[rono]

If you use a program, it's best to use it in whole loops at a time.  Each period of audio is unique, and it only works because the rest of the audio is encountered at the end of the silence.  

Glad you're enjoying it.

That would explain why I often notice I'm feeling different things at different times during a loop. At one moment I feel a surge of energy at another maybe an edginess like almost anxiety, at another part feeling 'warm' down below, at others feeling affectionate, at others supremely confident, at others thinking about women and what I like about them. 

This latter one, now that I think about it, is pretty pronounced for me. I didn't used to dwell on what I think the 'ideal woman' looked like, or "I like her hips, but not her butt, etc." but more of those sorts of thoughts come to me. It's all very clinical in a way. Taking the time to understand what I find attractive. Thankfully, most of it revolves around how my wife looks, or looked when she was at her best at different times during her life. Otherwise it could be rather distracting. 
It's almost like a voice or reflex in my head saying, "stop, you just saw a woman, what did you find attractive about her?"
Does this make sense based on the scripts?

This program is trying to get you to have the freedom and opportunity to have sex with every woman you encounter who you find attractive.  If you are fighting to limit that to just your wife, then it makes sense because the program is conflicting with that in some ways.

It's designed to achieve opportunity and interest, and to naturally and automatically seduce whatever female you encounter who you find sufficiently attractive sexually.  So I suppose in that regard it is attempting to achieve its goals through your focus on your wife.

That makes sense. I kind of thought it was something like that. It shouldn't be too much of a struggle because I really do find my wife very attractive--it's more than just body, though hers is great. It's eyes, style, what you know about them, how they handle themselves sexually, are they obviously submissive, etc.
I assume that the sub takes these things into account as well. e.g. I run into a '10' that is very physically attractive, but she comes across as ignorant or too slutty, etc. so she wouldn't rate that high in my attractiveness quotient. Or perhaps she's gorgeous and nice, but she's engaged to a good friend, so she would be much less interesting because of the external factors.
Am I getting the idea?

The subliminal does not go by looks alone.  It takes into account your overall attraction (primarily, but not purely, sexual) to the person.  A woman can be a "10" physically, but if she is not capable of giving me a decent conversation, she is not a "10" overall in my book.  If she's not trustworthy, she isn't a "10".  And so on.  All of it impacts how attracted I am to her, and that is going to be true for other people as well, so all of that is considered.

Thank you SO much on this, Shannon. It is VERY helpful. It explains a lot. I run into many women that I think are pretty for one reason or another, but are simply not as beautiful as my wife overall. She's a remarkable woman. Lovely smile, hourglass figure, wonderful personality, green eyes. Vivacious is the word I used to use when she was younger. Still applies at times. Also, I like a sexually submissive girl so I imagine that would be sensed and come into play. In other words, the fact that I'm picky is respected by the sub, which is good and I don't know why it would be that dangerous for committed married couples that really like each other and find one another very attractive. I suppose that not that many marriages are like that, though.

I do LOVE how much it increased our attraction to one another--especially during our vacation. Also, when a woman is very attracted to you (as my wife has been since beginning this sub) she forgives and apologizes far quicker than she used to when there is friction. I like this effect.

Hi All, (ongoing saga of my off-label experiment with DMSI 3.3.2)

So Day 3 of the 4th cycle turned out to be relatively uninteresting. Saw a couple last night with my wife. The wife of the couple had been on the affectionate side with me in the past, but this time I didn't notice anything other than normal levels of friendliness, etc. She's in a relationship, obviously, so she would not be susceptible to the sniper. I'm so relaxed socially now that I have a hard time noticing how folks respond to me unless it's way out of the ordinary.

However, after going out for dinner with my wife's mom (with my wife) and visiting with her brother and his wife, we came home, and got to bed late.
For some reason my wife was pretty keyed up by the time we got to bed even though it is quite late. We don't usually do bedtime sex, I discovered years ago that this was a recipe to have zero sex life. So usually I make it an event in the pre-dinner hours or morning. Sometimes midday or early afternoon particularly when we're on vacation. We even do it in the middle of the night if she wakes up and can't get back to sleep after a while. However, last night, she just turned to me and said she was "too keyed up" to sleep. She went down on me and we ended up in a highly intense intimate session. I had even taken a small amount of muscle relaxant and a pill that isn't a sleeping pill but that helps me sleep more deeply. Wow. Sparks flew in a way they haven't at that time of night in years.

I think there's something very effective about the 'sex-intensifier' part of the sub. That part is certainly working for me/us. 

So, thanks again, Shannon for your 'research'!

Thanks for being a part of my research.

Speaking of which, is there another, final version of DMSI that's under construction? Is there a particular sort of feedback that would be more helpful?

There will be at least one version of DMSI beyond the current one, most likely 2 or more.  The feedback I need is where it works, and where it does not work.  I get a lot of the latter, so you are helping me with the former.  But basically helping me zero in on specific areas that need adjustment.

I will be interested in seeing the difference in effects between this sub and future versions. I suppose that those of us who have 3.3.2 will be advised and allowed to test the future versions without further charge--seems I read that somewhere.