DAOS 4G

[chaosvrgn]

Took you long enough.

Of course you're offended. Otherwise you wouldn't come on here trying to corner people, you would let the results do the talking.

Rationality? Hardly. You're missing key information here. Nobody has ever claimed that DAOS was to designed to "cause members of the opposite sex to seduce and initiate sex with the user". You asked about the *****, there's the facts since you love 'em so much.

You talk about shaming, and playing the victim here. Come on dude, that's weak. You're not reading me here.

As far as the "idolizing", who named his thread after Dzemoo. Ryan Gosling in Drive is a little pussy in comparison. Now that's what I call cognitive dissonance. And I have no stake in trying to impress millionaires by sucking up to them or whatever. I can do on my own. Who are you to tell me I can't start in an owners box no matter how small? You're speaking from your own "success manual". I have my own. Again, who are you to tell me how to live my life?

What you seem to forget is that I'm young, I'm not married, I don't have kids, I don't pay child support, I don't have any ***** responsibilities. Again, that's what they're missing.

Sickologist --

I give NO sh*ts about how you live your life -- trust me on that. When I'm not reading the forum, you're just an insignificant entity inhabiting an insignificant fleeting memory in an insignificant part of my head. You essentially don't exist. So, let's not make this about you.

I asked Kol if he really wants to live HIS life like this PG-13 Sin City fan-fiction he seems to be writing. You never actually took the time to ask what his goals and dreams were before urging him to romanticize suffering and mental instability.

I'm here to present the ALTERNATIVE. That you can still be an absolute bad ass in your career, in the gym and in bed without becoming a character from some self-published erotica written by a 300lb pink haired fat chick.

Whether or not I'm offended is absolutely irrelevant to the discussion at hand. My motives for responding, are again, absolutely irrelevant to the discussion at hand. What I named my journal is irrelevant. The description of DMSI is irrelevant. Your response is full of irrelevancy.

The question is whether DAOS 4g is a "better subliminal" than DMSI as you insinuated. And regardless of who's offended or not, we can say that there is a RESOUNDING LACK OF EVIDENCE to say that it is.

It is a different tool, with a different purpose. And as long as we can agree to that, there's no issue.