CatMan: Hello Kitty!

[Yous]

Hello,

Just to try to contribute with my opinion, i think that when the subs are more and more complex and deep, the changes need more time.  I think that's why before 5g seemed to work for almost everyone, and since 5g, they work for less people, i think the scripts are really long and complex in comparison, so for executing them completely they need more time for some persons, even if the repetitions are much more and we should assume that should be the same time more less. The more deep is the change the more hard is the resistance, and this applied as well in the different persons, each person depending on the topic and his personality is more o less far from the objective than others. 

And in this case the objectives are really ambitious, and the scripts are changing. I assume that IML has arrived to one point that the scripts are really good and that they have almost everything, so normally the problem will not be in the script. 

I think sometimes could be better for some persons something more simple, maybe you could try 4g, forgetting about results and see in a couple of months how it was. 

And in the majority of the cases the subs are a really good help but not everything, could be great just to hear an audio and doing nothing become a millionaire or a playboy, but generally i think the audios make achieving the goals easier but they don´t do all the work.

Hello Yous!

Thanks for the post man.

Honestly, with the 5G vs 5.5G (now 5.75G) thing, I've often wondered if this possible over-reliance on "predictive models" is causing us a problem or not. Nothing beats actual real world testing in the end, something Shannon used to do HIMSELF before each release IIRC. Trying to simulate that in the efforts of creating easier workflow and efficiency can be appealing, but it can be dangerous because it just can't seem to recreate the dynamic human experience and background. Something gets lost.

I recall one incident where V2.2 was deemed by his models as being "too powerful to release without safety buffers". As a result, he had to delay the release to add such "safety buffers". However, after it was released, over time it was revealed to us that the aura scripting was crippled and the sub didn't actually function properly. To be honest, at that moment, I lost all faith in these "models". Because like I said earlier, they can't "catch" everything like real world dynamic testing can. It's not an indictment of him or them, just a factual reality. Maybe relying on them so much has become a detriment to the subs, I'm not sure.

Maybe your view about it taking longer because it's more tech etc. can be plausible. But, we've heard these things for multiple years now, been on this train a very long time. So it becomes hard to stay motivated by the same things, when it's hard to notice any change or momentum to back them up. As I said in my post before, we need the rubber to hit the road at some point, in order to validate the patience and belief, they aren't self-sustaining forever. So it's complicated.

I'm certainly not expecting the sub to "manifest" girls to my house without me leaving or anything, lol. But, in all fairness, we do buy a sub to achieve a specific goal, so we ARE measuring the sub to deliver on said goal, whatever that goal is. So, in essence, we do expect it to do the heavy lifting for that goal. Because if we could do it ourselves, we wouldn't need to buy the sub to begin with. However, back to the original point about helping the sub along. That's why I even arranged a couple weeks ago, to reconnect and put myself in front of a girl I was very attracted to five years ago, BEFORE I used subs, to test myself and DMSI in such a circumstance. It wasn't easy to work out, but I did it because I'm dedicated to this process and wanted to see if I've changed at all. I will report back on that if anything develops.

Thanks for the post, Yous! You're running LTU right? I've seen you asking around about it a lot I think, lol. I hope you have a great run with it.

Hi, 

I like IML and the forum because everybody can give his opinion and because it has good products. We pay for the best and we want the best. Anyway the same with any other product is logic that the customer if they don´t get what they want they say it. There are really good products, but sometimes they don't work for everyone or they don't give all what it´s expected in the product description, and if the user use the product as describe in the instructions is not the fault of the costumer. 

IML has a good policy of refunds, and i suppose it works well, i have never asked for one because i´m not using the product accordingly with the instructions. Im using LTU and MLS at the same time, MLS most of the time and when i feel that i'm losing my center or i have to deal with something emotionally i use LTU. My main goal is passing an exam and MLS helps me a lot in motivation and understanding, but its difficult to control the curiosity and being in one thing studying. MLS  help me as well in social stuff and when i drink alcohol in social situations, it helps me to remain with my intelectual abilities and i talk more, etc...Anyway when i get to pass the exam i will use LTU as prescribed.

Anyway this is an experimental program and you can not have a refund and you know it, but i guess more than the refund you would like the program to work for you, and whenever a product doesn´t gives you what it is supposed to is not the client fault if used as prescribed. 

In the other hand this is a public forum and it's important for IML, the people read the forum in order to get or not the products, so for IML it is difficult to deal with this. Anyway we say what we think either good or bad, so finally at the end is good for IML because it gives credibility about the good opinions. And i'm sure they will continue working to make the product work as better is possible. 

And i think anyway opinions as yours at the end are good to improve the products.

Happy Year dude,