10-16-2016, 12:40 PM
(10-16-2016, 12:37 PM)Mr. Anderson Wrote:(10-16-2016, 12:22 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:(10-16-2016, 11:48 AM)chaosvrgn Wrote: But... and I hate to be that guy, but I'm hoping something didn't "go wrong" with the program and it's making me feel this terrible. I was feeling AMAZING toward the end of v2.3. Now it feels like I've regressed back to my pre-AM6 habits!
I haven't done any versions besides 2.4, but I'm starting to think the same thing.
Imho, it has to do with what David DeAngelo (and don't get me wrong, I think he's nothing more than a clever businessman, but he did have ONE thing right, and that is this) called "the critical counter-intuitive".
I, personally, think that Shannon is going off what he THINKS should work, instead of what has been proven to work time and time again. Things that Dzemoo and Sickologist were testaments to over and over again.
I can't go into detail because it's not what people like to hear, but we have to get real here: do we want a program that works or do we want one that is politically correct?
Because I strongly believe it cannot be both.
So in this case should 2.5 work better, because there is no clearing inside, but looks like people resist. And at least AOS was working for Sick, which is one of the two scripts inside.
I don't know what changed between 2.3 and 2.5, but if 2.5 were the same as 2.3, there would be no need to release it. Right?