I had recently come up with this doubt.
I have two media applications on my computer and I ran few tests with ultrasonic tracks.
By using the same speakers (100hz - 20Khz frequency response), I noticed differences in the sounds.
I'm using:
VLC Media Player
KMPlayer
With VLC everything seems to be fine, I can hear ultrasonic sounds (I have a good hearing) but no sign of static or something like that. I don't use any equalization, everything is plain.
With KMPlayer seems I listen more sounds of the track, at high volumes (not maximum) starts to crack as opposite of VLC.
The question is: I have doubts of what should be the right outcome in terms of sound. Shannon, can you point out some media players that you know work well?
So we don't have worry about using the ultrasonic subliminals and we can know that our results obtained with subliminals are clear of any improper usage.
Thank you.
I have two media applications on my computer and I ran few tests with ultrasonic tracks.
By using the same speakers (100hz - 20Khz frequency response), I noticed differences in the sounds.
I'm using:
VLC Media Player
KMPlayer
With VLC everything seems to be fine, I can hear ultrasonic sounds (I have a good hearing) but no sign of static or something like that. I don't use any equalization, everything is plain.
With KMPlayer seems I listen more sounds of the track, at high volumes (not maximum) starts to crack as opposite of VLC.
The question is: I have doubts of what should be the right outcome in terms of sound. Shannon, can you point out some media players that you know work well?
So we don't have worry about using the ultrasonic subliminals and we can know that our results obtained with subliminals are clear of any improper usage.
Thank you.